Simple Question: Should you being using a higher discount rate for a smaller company?
Should you being using a higher discount rate for a smaller company?
Can someone enlighten me on why this is so, if so? Thanks!
Trending Content
| +165 | The "Not So Obvious" things that get you a return offer? | 20 | 18m | |
| +102 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 20 | 5h | |
| +65 | Best IB group on the Street | 27 | 1h | |
| +56 | BIG FOUR ARE PARADISE | 15 | 1h | |
| +46 | Thoughts and tips on how to speak like an investment banker. | 25 | 2h | |
| +45 | Tell me one good reason why Jefferies isn’t going to be a top bank in the next 5 years | 22 | 5h | |
| +36 | UBS Outlook | 28 | 1d | |
| +35 | Georgetown Placement for 2024 and 2025 | 21 | 6d | |
| +34 | How to deal with egotistical team? | 6 | 3d | |
| +32 | Highest Paid Bankers in Toronto? | 51 | 12m |
Career Resources
From first principles...
WACC consists of cost of debt and cost of equity.
Cost of debt is what you can get. Other things being equal, banks will charge higher interest to smaller companies, so WACC would be a higher a result.
Cost of equity is risk free rate + company beta x (expected market return - risk free rate).
So size of company only impacts cost of equity if size of the company influences beta of the company's earnings. This will depend on nature of the company's earnings and their correlation to the expected market return - ie beta is a measure of systemic risk.
Size of company may impact on the cash flows you are discounting, which are the probability weighted cash flows. If a company's business is risky and the nature of risk is such that you could diversify away that risk via portfolio selection, that non-systemic risk specific to the business should be reflected in the probability weight cash flows, not the discount rate.
Note my answer is based on theory.
In IB practice, people happily include non-systemic considerations in their choice of discount rate eg adding a country risk premium. Often, IB models only have one base case cash flow forecast rather than probability weighted cash flows.
We I-bankers abuse the theory our "science" rests on, often without appreciating how much we're producing junk results.
That's all good, though, because we ultimately back solve our results to numbers that mean the client does the deal which means we get paid our fee. No deal, no fee, no bonus.
there is usually a size premium you supply, so yes if it's a small cap company the discount rate will be higher in most cases, all else equivalent
Dolorem et odit autem et officiis doloremque et. Excepturi adipisci libero omnis rerum deserunt hic dicta.
Voluptas quia qui deleniti enim suscipit aut. Laborum rem voluptates officia laudantium magni dolorem quis quia. Amet explicabo voluptatibus sit velit est cupiditate.
Consequatur consequatur molestias consequatur aliquam consequatur ullam optio. Fugiat autem dolorum dolorum labore. Quis quidem id velit quibusdam doloribus voluptatum.
Ut numquam quidem et nulla quam sapiente ut. Voluptas quas et facilis nam veritatis. Sed quos reprehenderit ea non. Modi dolor quibusdam mollitia consequuntur quidem molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...