SSG is a great place to be in a recession. Goldman SSG , has always placed well into certain types of firms, the number of these firms has expanded in the past two years and will remain high for a few more.

In terms of prestige, which is a veiled question here, it is a prestigious role and no one would look down upon you.

Is it equivalent, well not really, they are very different positions in a lot of ways. I personally would go for SSG, but I like the whole distressed space thing both short and long term.

If you want to maximize your options and had to choose between both, then IBD (you have more options). If you like the space then go with SSG. The problem here is a little apples and oranges. If you like distressed or event driven markets, well you know what to do. If you like a more generic IBD then go with that.

If your options were a random IBD role and GS SSG, I think you know the answer.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

i know kids who come from humble backings in ssg.

they don't understand the concept of a supderday from what i hear. interviews can last months - not waiting to hear back, but actually interviewing more than 10x...

at bb's trading accounts for i'm guessing more than 80% of the firm's profits. i hear gs ssg contributes about 20% of that 80%... i could be wrong, but this is what i hear. the group is very small yet rakes in a shit ton of money. it's a no brainer why they go through so many rounds of interviews.

 

I can't tell if this is a serious question or not, but it any case... having been at a turnaround and special situations fund this past summer there is a lot of 'query work' as with buying any portfolio company. You're buying an entire company, not a position, using investors money, and staking your lively hood on its viability; I hope there is going to be a lot of 'query work'. Special situations / PE are analytic by nature though sometimes at a high level with screening investments, but if you think about it intuitively a special situations fund is still buying a company that typically will have some types of problems etc. so its PE+: lots of work.

With special situations and turnarounds and with any PE fund you work closely with management, I think the level of governance is sometimes fund based, but the guys at my firm were checking in weekly if not daily at some investments depending on performance.

IDK what you mean by model operations, an LBO does that already. If you're asking about day to day and FP&A type shit that's done at the portfolio level with metrics tracked by the sponsor.

You seem to have this rosy view of working with management and portfolio companies, its definitely a tough relationship to manage i.e. I'm reducing headcount (expense synergy), bolting on another company so you better integrate well, and oh yeah I'll be tracking that and its linked to your bonus, and I'm 15 years younger than you.... ready go.... Not that its a constant battle, but its not a walk in the park at least from what I saw / heard.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 

Bepbep, you are wrong and I think missing the OP's question since you were an intern at a "fund".

I think OP is asking about bank's SSG groups.

At bank's SSG groups, you will not look at companies but assets and materials. The most banks do with companies is coinvestments and mezz investments and that isn't SSG, its PIA.

I.e: GS SSG is illiquid investing mostly in aircraft leasing and real estate.

 
Illinoisprogrammerisajoke:
Bepbep, you are wrong and I think missing the OP's question since you were an intern at a "fund".

I think OP is asking about bank's SSG groups.

At bank's SSG groups, you will not look at companies but assets and materials. The most banks do with companies is coinvestments and mezz investments and that isn't SSG, its PIA.

I.e: GS SSG is illiquid investing mostly in aircraft leasing and real estate.

Damn, I assumed that since it was in the PE forum... I'll go take my pride somewhere else.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 

it's not high action like trading at all. However, you get to really focus since there is not as much noise. The "excitement" comes from chapter 11 court battles where there is a complex capital structure or dealing with funky jurisdictions. As far as working with management, you will be working AGAINST management most of the time. It's them that screwed things up and they will fight to take whatever value they can out of the company. If you are working with management, it's likely new guys you brought in. i.e. your capital is paying for them, so you'll be demanding results. unlike stocks, you cannto just sell when they screw up, so it can be very tough. A HF that bought defaulted debt from Niger recently froze money wired into the government's account in Hong Kong. This kicked off a diplmatic incident where the State Council (hungry for resources from Africa) from the PRC intervened creating all kinds of hell for Hong Kong's Basic Law which is meant to prohibit that type of ntervention. This one ended badly. they did not get the money.

That is not boring at all in my opinion.

 

We do a lot of stuff that would fall under the purview of the special situations group at a lot of banks, and I personally find it very interesting, but if you find the due diligence boring you're going to have a hard time finding a satisfying role as an analyst in any fundamentals-driven group.

Illinoisprogrammerisajoke, I think you're wrong about GS SSG. I've seen them in a number of loan-to-own situations with corporate debt.

There have been many great comebacks throughout history. Jesus was dead but then came back as an all-powerful God-Zombie.
 

Not sure where you guys are getting this info from, or what your definition of boring is. We work with Special Sits groups a lot at my bank and they take pretty significant slices of equity and debt in the deals we do. I've not worked on a desk myself, but it seems pretty interesting because they're looking across the entire capital structure in a huge variety of industries, in a lot of non traditional investments.

 

I worked at GS SSG. It's not "boring" but it's not exciting shit either and its more of an IBD pace than a trading pace. You look at illiquid assets and not whole companies. You look at IRR and returns. It's fun because you can look at anything but its limited in that you don't care about companies or managing them.

Yes it non traditional investments but the OP said, " I would really like to work with management and have the opportunity to impact the company itself."

In that case, you will get none of that at special situations. you'll have 0 impact on anything you buy and the only management you work with is some redneck dude trying to sell his building.

 

Zing!!! Who cares. The smartest people from ib trading / research are moved to cio Treasury anyway. Cio/ treasury houses some of the most important people in the bank.

Finance guy that understands linear algebra.
 

Think what u want, but facts are facts. If you know about running a bank, you would know how important cio is, especially right now. Besides sell side fixed income is dead.

Anyway if you really wanted to be attached to a business with a great pnl you wouldn't work in investment banking anway you would be a branch manager as retail banking is way more profitable. Everyone knows that.

Finance guy that understands linear algebra.
 

If you're principal you likely don't have clients. Is that back office then? Why does it matter?

CIO and treasury are good roles. 'Prestige' I don't understand but have seen people with good financial + networking skill do well from those functions (esp. CIO)

Honestly re exit opps from any non IBD role - networking is a lot more important than anything else due to the unstructured hiring processes.

 

Def. of front office is anything that is a revenue center. Back office is a cost center / support function for the cost center. Middle office is anything that supports front or back office or internal / supports platform.

 

The special situations group does work that ordinarily won't fit into other groups. Be careful since special doesn't mean prestigious. It also works with distressed companies and not old-fashioned companies, so there are trade-offs.

However, the group is extremely profitable so you won't have a shortage of stories to tell PE recruiters.

>Incoming Ash Ketchum, Pokemon Master >Literally a problem, solve for both X and Y, please and thank you. >Hugh Myron: "Are there any guides on here for getting a top girlfriend? Think banker/lawyer/doctor. I really don't want to go mid-tier"
 

Lol troll? SSG is about investing and/or advising in distressed / illiquid assets. Not about being in the Navy Seal of banking. Personally, i think you need to like that kind of asset.

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 

Lol troll? SSG is about investing and/or advising in distressed / illiquid assets. Not about being in the Navy Seal of banking. Personally, i think you need to like that kind of asset.

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 

Err .... do you mean SSG or merchant banking?

GS Merchant Banking is good but the actual GS SSG group is amazing ... however those groups won't hire that many analysts.

IMHO, it's better to be in GSMB as an analyst b/c you get more mentorship / guidance. SSG is mostly VPs and up with experience who make it rain.

That said, irf you have opportunity, I'd go but be sure to findout where your offer is from. There's TONS of principal groups: Prop Desks, Principal Investments, Merchant Banking - they all generally do the same but the products focus, location, and general investment mandates differ

On the others, not every ssg is actually good ... i'd take UBS PE over UBS SSG

 
pokersliar:
Err .... do you mean SSG or merchant banking?

GS Merchant Banking is good but the actual GS SSG group is amazing ... however those groups won't hire that many analysts.

IMHO, it's better to be in GSMB as an analyst b/c you get more mentorship / guidance. SSG is mostly VPs and up with experience who make it rain.

That said, irf you have opportunity, I'd go but be sure to findout where your offer is from. There's TONS of principal groups: Prop Desks, Principal Investments, Merchant Banking - they all generally do the same but the products focus, location, and general investment mandates differ

On the others, not every ssg is actually good ... i'd take UBS PE over UBS SSG

Obviously, but good luck getting into one of the exclusive groups at UBS like SSG, PE, O'Connor, etc. GS SSG is open to college grads. Recruiting at the elite placements in UBS, on the other hand, is a complete black hole.

UBS O'Connor guys were originally criticized by colleagues due to earning, literally, over 10x other UBS stars. Then again, studying the few information available about the group shows anybody working in this area will learn tons.

I dunno... I don't have a chance, but maybe you do. Good luck. All I've heard is these groups are for experienced people, not for college grads just looking for pay and prestige.

 

Following the market crisis in the financial services industry, the following are emerging perspectives:

  1. Asset managers are under severe stress
  2. Client trust has been damaged
  3. Product landscape is shifting
  4. Focusing on the core will be key
  5. M&A set to accelerate
  6. Clients are demanding better reporting, risk and compliance management
  7. Sales and marketing teams are under the microscope
  8. Effective leadership will require a more thoughtful approach
  9. Compensation renegotiations need care
  10. Lay the foundations now for future success

I have realized that uncovering hidden value in unique, different or “off the beaten path” assets might make the difference between a successful turnaround and a complete business failure. According to the WSJ, the number of distressed debt deals – in which creditors use their debt holdings to seize ownership control of failing companies – has increased by almost 40% so far this year.

My goal is to sharpen my out of the box thinking and hands-on experience in regards to the following:

  • How to monetize, capitalize and leverage assets often thought of as illiquid?
  • Managing human capital aimed at revitalizing distressed businesses for near-term viability and long-term improvement

Are there any firms out there that anyone can recommend? Perhaps there are some niche consulting shops that are working with distressed companies who are being rescued with TARP funds.

Thanks in advance.

 

GS SSG is going to be joining the Merchant Banking Division soon. The Tokyo team is already in MB. I don't know if this means that they will abandon their off-the-balance-sheet investing approach or if they're going to behave more like PIA and invest through a fund structure, though.

 

Voluptatem culpa facere occaecati est sed. Aliquid facilis voluptatem enim rerum ut laudantium harum. Natus et aliquam cupiditate quia et eum suscipit. Velit libero neque natus soluta nihil nihil. Ut nihil quasi odio veniam praesentium dolor occaecati. Rerum beatae natus quisquam qui praesentium delectus quod.

Quasi quo ad omnis iste voluptatem ducimus. Officiis voluptatum porro eius temporibus ut. Porro est praesentium aperiam quia. Ut alias id libero unde. Omnis et ipsam a dolor enim fuga impedit. Aspernatur praesentium aspernatur necessitatibus ab sapiente officiis aliquam. Maxime amet sunt accusantium et dolor numquam.

 

Similique ratione dolor explicabo sunt inventore. Incidunt possimus sed numquam fugit sapiente fugit. Quia quo magni accusamus unde nesciunt dolore ipsum.

Illo soluta numquam dolorem mollitia quidem nisi velit fugit. Dignissimos et eaque veritatis qui omnis amet et. Veniam velit ut ea ipsum. Omnis aspernatur quae velit maiores saepe qui. Omnis dolore sed voluptatum libero asperiores ut itaque. Quis quas a praesentium necessitatibus est molestiae possimus. Sint deleniti laudantium qui non libero.

Voluptas magni laborum sit est debitis eveniet. Pariatur perferendis incidunt soluta. Qui vitae doloribus non esse sit dolorum est distinctio. Eum error corrupti animi asperiores minus. Repellendus aspernatur nesciunt voluptatem aut explicabo. Voluptatem atque aut vero dicta deserunt.

Dolores sed et deleniti excepturi. Eum aut fuga praesentium quisquam non assumenda accusantium.

 

Placeat culpa et officiis in voluptatibus. Omnis et consequuntur nam rerum non sunt vel nulla. Aperiam ea vel eius voluptatem. Eos velit repellendus veniam laudantium suscipit consequatur optio.

Maiores cum ut et sunt voluptas occaecati. Repellat et ipsum porro ut et dolorum ea non. Perspiciatis quis ea aut quia explicabo quis. Qui quo sequi qui illo recusandae reiciendis possimus. Maxime optio ad eum ad saepe. Repellat dolor nam dolorum architecto.

Voluptatem et asperiores odit reiciendis. Sint suscipit nihil dolorem iste. Explicabo vero repellat sit dignissimos id. Repellendus explicabo sed neque mollitia pariatur. At animi accusamus assumenda perferendis consequuntur eos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”