How to Position for a Recession

All the signs of a recession are present. Unemployment is below the natural rate, the VIX is historically low while price levels are historically high, and central banks are beginning to simultaneously unload massive balance sheets while inflation still remains below target levels.

Here's an article from Seeking Alpha showing their take on the coming storm: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4085445-recessio…

I won't be arrogant enough to assume that I can predict when the market will turn, but we all know that it will inevitably come at some point. From what I've heard from people who graduated into the last recession, the job seeking process was incredibly difficult. Now granted, this was the second worst crisis in the last century, but I think there are some lessons that can be applied to the next slowdown.

So my question is this; for those that graduated into a recession, what's your story? How did you go about breaking in?

Also, how can prospective monkeys prepare for a recession? More networking with those in boutiques/non-IB careers? Learn more technicals? Pick up another degree/major?

 

If you're worried about a recession when you graduate, work your ass off now and invest the money when shit hits the fan. You'll make a great return when it recovers (assuming you don't invest in the troubled assets that could go belly up), and you can use that experience in interviews, if it's pertinent.

Worst case scenario, you worked your ass off and you still have a lot saved up?

 

Im not an active trader. I guess that, as you get paraniod/concerned about the market or a particular security collapsing then you'll exit positions and have more cash on hand. Possibly investing in securities that have inverse relationships?

“The only thing I know is that I know nothing, and i am no quite sure that i know that.” Socrates
 

I'm in a secondary market, but did some work in an oil and gas region and the rural exploration markets look like that now. There hasn't been a ton of dry powder heading into that region, but plenty of deals that are taking more cash than people expect to execute when deals are happening. Prices off at least 50% on some assets, but this play is going to take some time to get out of the hangover. It's been a cycle on fast forward in some ways, but would like to hear what people have to say about a national level downturn instead of me seeing the tide go out in a single specific area.

I'm just happy my home market is doing well and I can go between the two markets.

 

I can tell you that right now we are in an interesting period from a developers standpoint. We develop mainly retail shopping centers in the southeast - some single tenant but not a lot. Anyway, upper management is putting a slowing on hiring as they predict a downturn for the next 1-1.5 years. Their rationale for this is tightening restrictions on the banks from the fed. Single tenant lending will still be easy to do. But larger $40m+ deals will be harder. We are talking about construction lending here, by the way. Our firm is seeing a transition in the next year and a half to making acquisitions of stabilized assets rather than purely developing large deals. Since construction lending is getting harder to make deals - and construction costs are rising higher and higher - it only makes sense to do this. My take on it is that obviously MF is risky to get into right now and apparently retail will take a small downturn - developing wise.

Again, this is all information relayed to me from upper management. Not fully my opinions or assessment but I trust their experience and opinions.

 

I'm 39. Got in to lending in 1995 (real estate stunk in the 90's), started selling real estate in 1999. Opened my own CRE brokerage in San Diego in 2001.

The big dogs at CoStar who have their hands on all the data you could ever dream of are saying what everyone else is saying. The end is near. Yes, 1 to 1.5yrs...regardless of asset class.

Signs to look for are increasing prices yet low overall transaction volume. Also, in early 2008 my pipeline was stacked. All seemed well, but by spring deals were falling out left and right. Talked to everyone I knew and the same was happening from March to the Summer.

There are many other things to look for but high prices and low volume to me is one of the last things to happen before the correction. San Diego for sale housing volume in 2016 is predicted to be down 2% from 2015...prices up about 10%.

 

Construction lending is on its last leg. There's almost no construction money out there right now. Only for the very best deals and sponsors. All the lenders want cash flowing deals.

Equity is still there for all kinds of deals. New funds are being closed and folks are still aggressively searching for deals. It's clear however that the sentiment is that it's tough to find deals that pencil at this point since prices (mainly land and hard costs) are so high.

In terms of slowing transaction volume, this is definitely noticeable. Everyone I talk to is not as busy as they were last year around this time. It's almost as if the summer lull came and never left in a way.

This is my first cycle so I can't say that I know what it means for the big picture, but that is what I am seeing.

One thing I am struggling to understand is that in the event of a turning point and correction period, why do so many acquisitions folks get laid off? I would think that once a correction occurs and prices start dropping, this is the point at which most (or the smart?) equity and developers would want to swoop in and tie up deals at a good basis and potentially time the completion of their project on the upswing. Especially if they are sitting on a new fund with tons of dry powder. Clock is ticking on the fund, money still has to be put to work no?

How long does a typical correction period last? Are we talking 1 year? 2 years? More?

 
Best Response

Interesting question, read it a couple days ago and have been mulling over a response. I started my career coming out of the early 1990s recession so I’ve been through a couple cycles now. The 2008-2009 recession was a confluence of too much credit and leverage in the overall economy so I’m not sure we’ll see a repeat of the size, scale and breadth of that this time around. I don’t know if I can craft a comprehensive narrative to address your question but here are some observations I’ve made that might be informative. There are so many related issues that contribute to this such as Fed policies, the political environment, cap rate compression, etc. but here is what’s off the top of my head. Just one man’s opinion so don’t throw any monkey shit, okay?

• To the extent the US enters a recessionary cycle, real estate will not be THE contributing factor although we will undoubtedly be impacted by it. Consumer credit, auto loans and student loans look to be major problems this go-round. • We won’t see the volume of REO or non-performing loan deals come to market like we did in 2010-2012 so don’t bother raising an “opportunity fund” or anything like that. The reality is that most of the problem deals this time will be primarily in 2006-2007 vintage CMBS and all the major special servicers are owned by PE so they’ll likely keep those deals in house.
• Debt underwriting, while certainly more aggressive the past couple years, is still backstopped by plenty of equity, whether sponsor cash, pref equity or mezz. Lenders are a lot more sensitive to proceeds coming out of deals so leverage remains reasonable. • MF may feel overbuilt but the vast majority of new construction has been limited to the top 10-12 MSAs and overall vacancy is still historically low at ~5%. Fannie MF delinquencies are something like 7bhps on a $200B+ portfolio. Homeownership is still at a low of ~63% so there will be continued rental demand. There still looks to be opportunity in Class B and suburban product. • There are been little spec office built this cycle and projects that have gotten done are Class A+ core market deals and there is a still an appetite for those kind of deals, particularly from foreign investors. Interesting stat I recently heard is that office growth is 50bhps slower than employment growth. Of course, there is a huge dichotomy between CBD and suburban office which continues to struggle. • Retail, much like office, has seen limited construction outside of higher profile mixed-use development in top MSAs. There is still a huge problem with secondary and tertiary market retail (JCPenny, Sears, Macys anchored deals) which will cause a lot of CMBS losses and keep the special servicers busy. Don’t know what the answer is there but any developers that can come up with creative reuse for 70s-80s vintage malls will absolutely kill it.
• Hospitality has also seen limited new supply (outside of NYC) because construction financing for hotels has been VERY tough to come by. • Construction financing is available for good deals with good sponsors but it’s getting expensive and your choices are getting more limited. Many traditional sources of construction capital, namely national and regional banks, are exiting the business or severely limiting their exposure mainly because it’s not profitable for them. Making construction loans used to be the way these groups got permanent financing deals. Now, not so much. I spoke with a senior guy at a major national bank the other day about construction loans the other day and he had an interesting perspective which was why would he want take the risk of loaning construction money for only 2-3 years when he knew a life company or Agency was going to take him out when the deal was built? Without a high degree of certainty that he would get the perm financing, it wasn’t worth it to him to make the construction loan. • So, how do you survive a downturn? Two words – FEE WORK. This is what got a lot of guys through the last recession. Services like property management, asset management, BPOs, construction management, etc. kept some amount of cash flowing when the credit markets were frozen and transactions weren’t getting done. I was a developer for 15 years before the recession and then became a workout guy since I understood how development deals were structured, could help complete them, etc. and have stayed on that side of table once the markets came back. Ask yourself whether your firm has a secondary service or cash flow source you can rely on when your primary business slows down? Do you personally have additional skills that can be deployed if your main gig slows down or goes away? • Interesting to note that a lot of money came into the market in 2009 and early 2010 looking for deals and got crushed because they were too early by a year. Not sure how that applies this time around since there are so many firms and funds with war chests ready to deploy capital at a moment’s notice.

The final takeaway is that very few saw the 2008-9 recession coming. Some of the capital markets guys saw it (like here: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/just-so-you-guys-know) but most of us didn’t. This time, EVERYBODY is aware of where we are and hypersensitive to not having a chair to sit in when the music stops. Which leads me to believe it won’t be too bad. Mildly uncomfortable perhaps but not the industry-wide bloodbath we saw just a few short years ago. Good luck.

 
jackstraw001:

This time, EVERYBODY is aware of where we are and hypersensitive to not having a chair to sit in when the music stops. Which leads me to believe it won't be too bad. Mildly uncomfortable perhaps but not the industry-wide bloodbath we saw just a few short years ago. Good luck.

Solid post. This part is the most interesting to me, and totally agreed. Seems like everybody is sitting and waiting (with cash) for a correction so that they can be sure to not "miss out" like they did in 2010-2014. Ironically, this could very well prevent such a sizable shift in values.

www.assessre.com
 

Great post. Interesting read for sure. You probably see bigger deals than me but the middle market of $1mil to $10mil was the same fiasco.

You bring up a great point about fee work. As we speak, to diversify my earnings I'm pretty close to landing the leasing on about 100k sqft of coastal commercial. Currently high vacancy for a few reasons that can be resolved. A buddy of mine who's worked for two very large management firms wants to team up and start a management company. In our back pockets to kick things off we feel we have about 600 units willing to switch over. Time to become full service...I won't do daily operations. But I can bring in buildings and assets to manage.

 

People/companies get shifty when the shit hits the fan. Commissions don't get paid, deals get stolen...office politics increase. Divorces happen...

I had a very strong relationship with a bond fund that lent private money. In 2007, even with a pretty strong fee agreement with my client, this lender circumvented me for two reasons. One, out of spite cause they were sort of forced to lend the borrower the money very late in the cycle on a risky development deal, and two, to keep the loan amount as small as possible by not having to add broker fees. This resulted in a lawsuit and a lost relationship. The bond fund no longer lends money cause they made a ton of terrible business decisions. Redemptions killed them.

A client of mine on another deal had over $400k in an interest reserve for his completed, now leasing up storage facility in a great market. TARP just got approved. This Chinese bank wanted to buy several banks and needed to improve it's balance sheet. So, they pulled the $400k left in the reserve, put the borrower into default and sold the note on freaking craigslist.

Currently these CMBS deals are getting refinanced or just selling. Life is good right now. Whatever CMBS deals are ballooning over a year from now will struggle to new financing for one reason or another. It may not be the bloodbath that was predicted but there will be some fallout for sure.

The lead up to a correction is stressful. It's very messy in the middle of it trying to get balloon notes extended and keep things alive. I hope we never see 2009/2010/2011 ever again.

 

Depends if my small developer has the financial wherewithal to make it through the downturn. Lots of small developers don't survive, but they come back when the market starts turning around again.

If you are one of 20 analysts at a large REPE fund, they may have a rainy day cash fund and can still do deals. But they also may thin the herd to keep costs low. Why pay for an analyst if they have nothing to do?

 

San Diego MF is still going strong. I'm still seeing some ok deals. All off market of course. The primary driver is long term rates are still low (just got quoted 4.5% on a 10yr fixed) and rising rents. My understanding is that most markets topped out on rents about a year ago? We're still rising here.

I just put some units in escrow in a C location on a C property. Very reliable real estate as is most San Diego MF but tough tenant profile to some. 75% section 8. These large'ish 2/1.5's have rent projections of $1700mo. I didn't come up with these numbers, my buyer did. In 18mo we'll be at a 5.9 cap.

As the market moves forward, I'd rather be an analyst on the debt side. Brokerage is still making money but it's so competitive. My clients get so many calls right now from brokers. It's crazy.

 

//www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/here-is-how-equity-research-works

Read #s 1 and 2. Nobody really cares about the research (unless your research is really fucking good. It usually isn't THAT good.).

And you can't say is ER "vulnerable" just like you can't say is IB "vulnerable". If you're a good associate on a good team, you're probably fine. If you're a shitty associate on a shitty team, you're probably fucked.

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

Not speaking from experience but I assume allot of dead weight would be cut rather quickly i.e. low performers. I've seen downsizing and the true "grinders" always have connections because they bring allot of value to the table. I have not seen any evidence to the contrary.

“The only thing I know is that I know nothing, and i am no quite sure that i know that.” Socrates
 
  • Underperformers, across the board
  • Product people (who generally speaking are fungible, don't have relationships, and have a lot less to do)
  • Lev fin, probably for obvious reasons
  • Coverage bankers in sectors disproportionately affected by the downturn (think TMT in 2000/2001)
  • VPs and Directors - there's less need for their execution skills and they mostly don't have their own relationships

Primary exceptions to all of the above are rainmaking MDs' "go to" people. In a downturn banks can't/don't care as much about quality of execution or cultivating the next generation of coverage officers, as they do about near-term revenue. They will hold on to their top relationship bankers, who will then have some say in who they need to get hired and close deals.

 

Consectetur amet omnis aut nam fuga sunt. Corporis ex voluptas fugit illo atque voluptas. Fugiat atque delectus ipsa provident consequatur impedit.

Voluptas neque id qui ducimus molestiae nihil. Voluptatem voluptatem sit perferendis perspiciatis ab iusto in. Sint neque reiciendis voluptates sed. Recusandae dicta omnis laboriosam. Modi hic occaecati saepe et dolor qui. Voluptas dicta itaque maiores sunt beatae. Harum laudantium nulla voluptates ipsum dicta non neque.

Fugit vel sapiente itaque voluptates assumenda similique. In deleniti earum culpa ab. Quibusdam earum quia beatae est qui assumenda voluptatem. In unde quia unde earum dolore cum ut. Non architecto veniam officia aut sint.

Harum optio quia enim quis et ratione est. Dicta at sunt quas accusamus iure. Perspiciatis soluta necessitatibus doloremque ipsa nihil voluptas. Illo architecto ut eum incidunt explicabo.

 

Veniam inventore incidunt suscipit qui est ut eaque dolorem. Molestiae velit deleniti ea voluptatem quia sed est.

Ut et consequatur ad temporibus. Ipsa corporis commodi optio odio ut ad assumenda. Et dolores aut voluptate quaerat.

Et voluptatum sunt sunt ullam architecto odit. Pariatur labore nemo omnis. Cumque et saepe nemo commodi placeat voluptas.

Eligendi debitis fuga suscipit sint. Similique ullam aut veritatis facilis error. Quod doloribus similique voluptatem voluptas rerum reprehenderit.

"All men are alike in their dreams, and all men are alike in the promises they make. The difference is what they do."— Jean Baptiste Moliere

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”