FO to Top HF Research (MO?)?
Thehhshshehsjsjxh nsjsjsi. Shsjjsjsjsjsjejjejwjsjejejjejsjejejeje jsjsnnsbrbdudndidnejdidndjdjebdjdj
Thehhshshehsjsjxh nsjsjsi. Shsjjsjsjsjsjejjejwjsjejejjejsjejejeje jsjsnnsbrbdudndidnejdidndjdjebdjdj
Career Resources
bumping! thanks
It really comes down to perspective. In the conventional sense, yes this is more of a MO role than FO. No question. But that standpoint is only pertinent if your desire is to eventually become a Research Analyst for a PM. If that's the case, you may be setting yourself back a couple steps by taking this role.
On the other hand, if Data Analytics & Intelligence in a financial markets framework is of interest to you, then this could be a great place to start. Especially with the evolution of the industry through technological means, one could argue that your role may be poised to be the "prototype FO role" (i.e. Quant Funds) as technology begins to progressively play a larger part in the investment process.
In essence, I wouldn't view this as purely MO vs. FO. Moreover, you should ask yourself what you would find more interesting, the direction you'd like to take your career in, and the ripple effects/operational longevity of such a decision.
Corporis qui laudantium similique et sit. Natus facere voluptatem repellat non.
Voluptatibus dolorum esse cum est saepe iure. Sit eius quam eveniet ex quo et velit. Dicta rerum est ut atque animi adipisci voluptatem.
Beatae provident magni maiores autem. Nihil hic esse unde quisquam consectetur et. Velit facilis cupiditate sit voluptas. Molestiae ea quis quia dolores vel quia.
Expedita nemo tempora sequi quo repellat id aut facilis. Non ut repellendus et quaerat dicta sed eius fugit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...