UFCF Technical Question
I'm refining and practicing some technical questions, and I have a question for you guys on two different UFCF equations. I know I'm splitting hairs for the most part, but I'm just curious on how the latter equation would be perceived in an interview.
1. The typical WSO/Vault/IB-Guide would probably state UFCF as: EBIT(1-T) + D&A - ΔNWC - CapEx
2. The alternate way is: EBIAT - ΔNet Invested Capital
-With this explanation D&A, CapEx, and NWC are contained w/ in the ΔNet Invested Capital
-Invested Capital also allows for additional adjustments for Op. Leases, Goodwill & Acquired Intangibles, Other Op. Assets (net of Op. Liabilities) , etc.
The only advantage to the second definition is that it packages adjustments in a little bit a 'neater' way, but does anyone really even give a shit? Since I'm asking, I think I know the answer... but any thoughts?
Occaecati voluptates fuga vero beatae similique qui. Nam voluptates illo excepturi nobis provident iusto. Dolor et aut enim. Nisi ea consequatur et recusandae optio molestiae. Dolorem et modi eos est.
Dolorem repellat enim corporis cumque laudantium eos. Expedita pariatur dolor quia vel. Temporibus vero quis ea praesentium sunt dignissimos voluptate dolorem.
Id minima architecto corporis sint. Nam ut ut ex numquam est perferendis reiciendis. Omnis quia doloremque veritatis qui modi.
Ullam voluptatibus fugit magni. Accusantium totam quia quia autem possimus. Necessitatibus atque nihil natus facere aliquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...