Cold Messages through LinkedIn -> Informational Interviews?

To those in industry, how would you feel about getting a message asking for an informational interview through LinkedIn? Assuming the message comes from some kid in UG you don't know, and maybe share a random, large group with. My school's alumni database is subpar when it comes to people's position and LinkedIn allows me to target people doing what I'd like to do. Would you be receptive to a message? Or would you just ignore the kid?

Thanks

 

You'd be surprised, more people are willing to help than you think. Most of us were in your shoes at one time and know how difficult it could be. It could be very helpful especially in your case where there aren't an abundance of alumni on the street and hence they'd probably appreciate seeing another alumni represent their school on the street.

Just follow the same common sense rules that you normally would when cold emailng and you'll be fine.

 

rebelcross,

Thanks for your response. What about with regards to messaging people not from your alma mater? My school gets good IB representation but when it comes to S&T it's pretty weak and I was thinking of messaging some random people.

 

I have the exact same question. My alumni base in I-banking isn't that strong, so I really need to try other avenues. I've been sending very polite messages to people, but to no avail so far. Can anyone share some experience?

 

Got nothing to lose. People will help...just give them a reason to. Nice profile, good story, sheer persistence, etc.

__________________________ if you ain't first, you last
 

I had a great response from people that I shared groups with who were not alums. Many of these groups were specific to my experiences and not as big as say "Finance Club of NY" so it made it a little easier. No sense in not trying.

 
drexelalum11:
Very little to lose. However, when I've contacted people off of LinkedIn, I don't use the site's messaging, I just figure out their email from firm & name.

I guess email is better than linkedin, all else equal, but if they're wondering how you discovered their email address (if it's not on the firm's site) won't your email be much less effective? Plus, if your commonality is not mentioned in the peson's web bio, then how will you explain to them that you share XYZ commonality? These problems are solved by going through linkedin, just throwin' that out there.

 
drexelalum11:
Very little to lose. However, when I've contacted people off of LinkedIn, I don't use the site's messaging, I just figure out their email from firm & name.

How was your response rate? I've been doing the same, but I got zero response so far. My email really is as polite as it can possibly be, so not sure if I haven't sent out enough emails or this isn't an effective strategy.

 
pygmalion:
drexelalum11:
Very little to lose. However, when I've contacted people off of LinkedIn, I don't use the site's messaging, I just figure out their email from firm & name.

How was your response rate? I've been doing the same, but I got zero response so far. My email really is as polite as it can possibly be, so not sure if I haven't sent out enough emails or this isn't an effective strategy.

I'd say my response rate cold-emailing people was around 90%, but I didn't do it very frequently, and usually had more of a connection than "you work in finance, let's talk."

 

Bump to an old thread...

Is it ok to follow-up with a 2nd LinkedIn message if they don't respond after a week or two? This is for people in my fraternity's national alumni group that haven't responded (I have nearly zero school alums in IB). Or should I wait longer since it's LinkedIn?

 

I say follow Drexel's advice and email them at their work email (its not that hard to figure out). Or if you want to show some guts call the banks main line/directory, and get them to transfer you to said person, and just talk on the phone (i've never done this haha i'm just throwing out some ideas)

looking for that pick-me-up to power through an all-nighter?
 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=//www.wallstreetoasis.com/finance-dictionary/what-is-london-interbank-offer-rate-libor>LIBOR</a></span>:
I say follow Drexel's advice and email them at their work email (its not that hard to figure out). Or if you want to show some guts call the banks main line/directory, and get them to transfer you to said person, and just talk on the phone (i've never done this haha i'm just throwing out some ideas)

But isn’t emailing stalker-style the riskiest option b/c it makes bankers uneasy?...Given that, and the fact that I have time (not doing recruiting this fall), should I try linkedin one/two more times, then try calling a couple weeks later?

BTW, I realize I’ve got “nothing to lose”; I’m just saying that an email from someone who was never provided an address (and especially if it's not listed on their website) seems, to me, to be much riskier than 2nd/3rd linkedin messages and follow-up calls.

 
swagon:
<span class=keyword_link><a href=//www.wallstreetoasis.com/finance-dictionary/what-is-london-interbank-offer-rate-libor>LIBOR</a></span>:
I say follow Drexel's advice and email them at their work email (its not that hard to figure out). Or if you want to show some guts call the banks main line/directory, and get them to transfer you to said person, and just talk on the phone (i've never done this haha i'm just throwing out some ideas)

But isn’t emailing stalker-style the riskiest option b/c it makes bankers uneasy?...Given that, and the fact that I have time (not doing recruiting this fall), should I try linkedin one/two more times, then try calling a couple weeks later?

BTW, I realize I’ve got “nothing to lose”; I’m just saying that an email from someone who was never provided an address (and especially if it's not listed on their website) seems, to me, to be much riskier than 2nd/3rd linkedin messages and follow-up calls.

if you want help, email the person

 
But isn’t emailing stalker-style the riskiest option b/c it makes bankers uneasy?...Given that, and the fact that I have time (not doing recruiting this fall), should I try linkedin one/two more times, then try calling a couple weeks later?

BTW, I realize I’ve got “nothing to lose”; I’m just saying that an email from someone who was never provided an address (and especially if it's not listed on their website) seems, to me, to be much riskier than 2nd/3rd linkedin messages and follow-up calls.

No one gives a shit man. And regardless, the type of person that would actually care about that sort of thing most likely isn't going to want to help you out anyways...

 

Thanks, but everyone's missing my point. I should have expounded more initially, sorry...

I'm wondering about the RELATIVE effectiveness of 3 follow-up methods to linkedin messages: an additional linkedin message, a phone call, or a stalker-style email.

Only the email involves conspicuous stalking. Right or wrong, it’s been drilled in my head that a stalker email can turn off otherwise helpful people…so why not reserve stalker emails as a last resort when linkedin messages fail AND you can’t get through on the phone?

 
swagon:
Only the email involves conspicuous stalking. Right or wrong, it’s been drilled in my head that a stalker email can turn off otherwise helpful people…so why not reserve stalker emails as a last resort when linkedin messages fail AND you can’t get through on the phone?

My line of thinking is to e-mail first before calling someone (especially if it is a straight up cold call) 'cause people do not like to be caught off guard. Especially if it is an MD or someone fairly high up in the org.

Also, I e-mail (or am going to, haven't started yet) using the company e-mail rather than through linkedin. The linkedin method seems less professional, less ballsy, and more likely to be rejected, imho. It really is not that difficult to find the person' s e-mail address on the web.

Best of luck.

 
Best Response
swagon:
Thanks, but everyone's missing my point. I should have expounded more initially, sorry...

I'm wondering about the RELATIVE effectiveness of 3 follow-up methods to linkedin messages: an additional linkedin message, a phone call, or a stalker-style email.

Only the email involves conspicuous stalking. Right or wrong, it’s been drilled in my head that a stalker email can turn off otherwise helpful people…so why not reserve stalker emails as a last resort when linkedin messages fail AND you can’t get through on the phone?

How is an e-mail stalking, but calling isn't? How do you have their phone number anyway?

I had the exact same concerns as you do about cold-emailing guys I found on LinkedIn. I went ahead and did it anyway though and had no problems whatsoever. No one ever asked where I got their contact info, and surprisingly, most people actually ended up getting back to me.

 
downtown22:
swagon:
Thanks, but everyone's missing my point. I should have expounded more initially, sorry...

I'm wondering about the RELATIVE effectiveness of 3 follow-up methods to linkedin messages: an additional linkedin message, a phone call, or a stalker-style email.

Only the email involves conspicuous stalking. Right or wrong, it’s been drilled in my head that a stalker email can turn off otherwise helpful people…so why not reserve stalker emails as a last resort when linkedin messages fail AND you can’t get through on the phone?

How is an e-mail stalking, but calling isn't? How do you have their phone number anyway?

I had the exact same concerns as you do about cold-emailing guys I found on LinkedIn. I went ahead and did it anyway though and had no problems whatsoever. No one ever asked where I got their contact info, and surprisingly, most people actually ended up getting back to me.

To clarify, I'm talking about calling numbers available on the company's website, be it HR or actual bankers' numbers; using this readily available information is not stalking. In the case of email, it is also not stalking if the banker's address is available online. But if it's not online and you have to guess it, that's a little more stalker-ish. Get it?

I appreciate you letting me know you've had successful responses after just guessing email conventions. And I also believe that a call is MUCH easier to make if you're following up on a message or email...but you're still not precisely addressing my point: what makes starting off with email BETTER than linkedin?

It just makes more sense to start off with linkedin, ESPECIALLY if you share a common group. If you circumvent linkedin and go straight for the email, it’s a little weirder when you mention that you share a linkedin group. You have to mention that you looked up their linkedin profile, and that makes it a bit more conspicuous that you had to guess their email address after noticing their linkedin profile. If you linkedin message first, then in a follow-up with email you can just say you’re following-up on a linkedin message; that way, it’s a little less conspicuous that you guessed their email, and it makes for a “warmer” email b/c you’re following-up rather than totally cold emailing.

Bottom line- In my opinion, messaging on linkedin first makes it easier to mention your commonality (if you share a group or whatever) and it makes a follow-up call or email easier. If you disagree, feel free to let me know exactly why. Hope this clarifies what I'm saying.

 

first off, bookmark this thread

//www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/email-structure

You won't have to 'guess' anyones email structure anymore. If people don't want to talk to you, they just won't email you back. Feel free to go through LinkedIn, but the best way to get a response is to go through email since it goes directly to their work, at least in my opinion. I've done this and no one ever questioned me as being a stalker.

A lot of things I have done to network is just trial and error. I've done everything from fine ER emails on research publications and emailed those people to finding people in IDD magazine and shooting them an email. Sometimes they won't reply and you just move on. LinkedIn is great, but I just was never a fan of the messaging system and I prefer to just send emails directly to the person.

looking for that pick-me-up to power through an all-nighter?
 

Thanks LIBOR. I shouldn't have used the word "guess" b/c I didn't mean it literally; by "guessing", I meant acquiring email addresses by using a first and last name to fit a company's email structure, i.e. get their address in a shady way as opposed to being given it or finding it through a "legit" source like the company's website.

But I get what you mean. I guess what you're saying is, it comes down to "feel" for you - you feel like emailing is more effective. All else equal, I agree, but I feel more comfortable linkedin messaging first if we share a group such as fraternity alumni b/c it makes the follow-up “warmer” to me. Maybe it’s all in my head but it just makes me a little more confident.

 

Email. End thread.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Oreos - why? I generally would think email as well, but him and I don't share a background school-wise. If I was maybe sharing a nationality with him in a foreign city, he might entertain the thought because we share circumstances.

LinkedIn is a little stalkerish, but it's kinda hard to reference this guy's experience in an email without outwardly making that point cause I think his full work background is only covered in LinkedIn, and not anywhere else (e.g., news articles, or former firm profiles, etc)...

 

I actually came across his name from a news article that mentioned the opening of the new shop in the region. I'm wondering whether it's better to reference that or LinkedIn (referencing both - would that be overkill?). If by email: referencing the article could come off proactive for following the particular market the firm's in. Referencing LinkedIn, he could check out my profile out of curiosity and see the number of mutual, legitimate connections and that could be a positive.

 

Email is probably better because a lot of people don't check their LinkedIn frequently. Tip: put a link to your LinkedIn in the signature of your email if you want people to see it. Also, stop overthinking this, it's a recipe for disappointment...

 

Between the two, I'd go with email. Unless there's already a relationship established, LinkedIn is a bit "stalkerish", as mentioned above. In any case, odds of a response are low unless the wording is succinct, relevant to the target's needs & has a touch of originality.

All the world's indeed a stage, And we are merely players, Performers and portrayers, Each another's audience, Outside the gilded cage - Limelight (1981)
 

Going against the grain a little, I think Linkedin would be better. Most people's Linkedin filters through to their personal email, and I've personally had better response rate from Linkedin than work emails (as it is easier for your email to get lost in the hundreds of other emails they probably receive at work).

You may have to be a little more concise with Linkedin, but if they are willing to help you anyways, I don't see how a 200 character vs 500 character message will really change that fact.

Also, regarding stalking on Linkedin; that is what it is for. If they are put off by you looking them up/contacting on Linkedin, then they must be missing the entire point of the website.

People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for freedom of thought which they seldom use.
 

1 tip. check your spelling. You won't believe how many "information interview" or "let's connect" requests I get that spelled something wrong. Instant Delete. I don't care how good the rest of the message was

2nd tip. don't make it look like you copy pasted the same message and sent it to a hundred people. If you want me to spend some time with you, spend 10 seconds looking at me and come up with something interesting/thoughtful

 

Some good basic tips above.

To answer your question, head of HR may be helpful in telling you about available opportunities, but they may not get you far beyond putting your resume in front of the hiring manager (or in this case, probably the PM).

I would plan on reaching out to a PM in a thoughtful way. You want to grab his/her attention and let them know of your interest and that you've done your homework. Getting "in" with someone senior is what will eventually get you in the door, HR is only going to do the very basic work around the hiring process.

 

You might want to be slightly less agressive in your InMails (maybe just ask them to chat or grab coffee with you in the next week or two) and then when you meet with them or get them on the phone you can make a smooth transition toward potential opportunities in the firm.

Also, even though InMail is supposedly more formal or 'important', you still want to keep your message brief and to the point if you really want a response.

 

Well done.

"The HBS guys have MAD SWAGGER. They frequently wear their class jackets to boston bars, strutting and acting like they own the joint. They just ooze success, confidence, swagger, basically attributes of alpha males."
 
LevFinGS:
and tried a few versions of his name in email form. Sent a "would love to hear your story"...blah blah email - and did not get a response. 1 week later I tried again, and he responded to set up a time to talk.

So you sent the same message to several variations of what might be his correct email address? When did you find out which one was correct? Was that the only one that didn't bounce back? And when you emailed him again a week later did you just send the message to the one correct email address?

Anyway, congratulations on the job offer! You earned it.

Too late for second-guessing Too late to go back to sleep.
 
brandon st randy:
LevFinGS:
and tried a few versions of his name in email form. Sent a "would love to hear your story"...blah blah email - and did not get a response. 1 week later I tried again, and he responded to set up a time to talk.

So you sent the same message to several variations of what might be his correct email address? When did you find out which one was correct? Was that the only one that didn't bounce back? And when you emailed him again a week later did you just send the message to the one correct email address?

Anyway, congratulations on the job offer! You earned it.

Correct, tried a few versions, got those mailer daemon emails for all but one. That's the one I wrote back too.

 

Recusandae quis est at mollitia qui. Exercitationem velit eaque qui ut nostrum. Est quisquam praesentium animi minima.

Facere sit tenetur vel. Et aut consequuntur molestiae est eum occaecati. Molestias aut iusto velit saepe.

Cumque facilis id rem quae laudantium. Ea eligendi dignissimos voluptatibus in optio quisquam. Et omnis quos quod voluptas excepturi molestias assumenda. Est sint saepe nostrum error. Aut eius excepturi nesciunt voluptatem.

Molestiae accusamus temporibus provident qui. Deleniti amet temporibus velit ea neque ut et. Quia nulla ut et et laborum dolore commodi dicta. Consequatur repudiandae molestiae distinctio in dolorum cumque veniam.

 

At ullam consequatur fuga iste. Unde velit numquam sint quidem est eum maxime maxime. Et et veniam sed sit exercitationem totam et. Tempore sint dolores reprehenderit qui. Quia quibusdam explicabo quidem harum voluptatibus.

Dolor impedit quo blanditiis sapiente quo odit voluptatem natus. Quae modi unde est quia ducimus est. Officia excepturi unde et ut. Minima velit repudiandae sed natus aut et sequi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”