Valuation multiples across different industries - Similar scenarios for different industries?

When calculating multiples for comparable company analysis, which multiples are used specifically for certain industries and which are specifically not used for certain industries? I know that EBITDA isn't used for financial institutions because a large portion of their revenues comes from interest. Are there any similar scenarios for different industries? Thanks

 

EV/whatever operating metric can be seen as an "unlevered" basis for competition within companies in that industry -->

For instance, website valuation: EV/unique monthly visitors, page views, active members, etc.

Oil and gas: EV/available reserves, etc.

Healthcare: EV/total #beds, etc.

FIG looks at AUM, etc.

RE uses FFO (funds from operations).

 

Second what analystforhire mentioned above. The most typical metrics involve Enterprise Value to compare across industries. There are things like EV/Total Subscribers for a telecom company or EV/3P Reserves for oil&gas companies. Other than EV, there are almost always a few very niche numbers that are really only observed on an industry-by-industry basis. For example, in the regulated utility space you could look at $/mW or in the metals & mining space you could observe price per ___ (e.g. "ton of steel").

Also, if you were looking specifically into something like commercial banks... you mentioned that they don't trade off of EBITDA, which is generally true. I would venture a guess that you'd want to look at something like Price/Tangible Book Value in this environment.

"You've got to belong to it."
 
Best Response

Not just valuation multiples vary across industry, but also certain operating metrics matter more in certain industries than others.

For example, inventory turns is quite important in retail, MLR (medical loss ratio) is really important in health insurance.

Also, you should still use the other traditional multiples. For example, you could find that EV/EBITDA is the same, but that EV/# total beds is lower (so the business is making less EBITDA per bed, i.e. less efficient than competitors). So if you were a value-add shop or a strategic with better operating efficiency, you could say "hey, I'm going to buy that business, improve operations, and capture that additional value". Sometimes the difference in efficiency can be explained but sometimes it cannot (ideally, you have an explanation for it and a fix).

 

For mining,

EV/Proven + Probable, EV/Proven + Probable + M&I and then EV/PP + M&I + inferred - companies with larger amounts of reserves are in general going to trade at higher multiples than those with resources since they're going to be trading higher.

Cost per oz - self explanatory

Market cap/NAV - you'll see this a lot in the royalty space. Companies with larger portfolios of royalties will trade at a higher premium to the NAV of the royalty streams.

 

Industries with a lot of CapEx hence DA and varying capital structures will tend to use EV/EBITDA to get an apples to apples comparison. Other industries with similar capital structures and relatively little CapEx i.e. banks will go with P/E multiples

 

Actually banks aren't getting valued on either these days. They are getting valued on if the market thinks they will be around next month or not since nobody knows what their real book value is or what their real earnings power is.

 

CapEx doesn't hit the income statement - it shows up as depreciation through time.

But - you need to make capital expenditures to keep the business going / keep it profitable.

Also, some companies choose to lease equipment, which is not capitalized, and that shows up on the income statement. Generally this is only smaller, private companies though.

 

You will use EBITDAR in companies that have sale and lease backs or large capital leases. In these companies, the R is really just a type of interest, its the way they have capitalized the company. So, you remove the R when its a capital structure issue not an operating issue.

EBITDA-Capex, as has been said is a cashflow multiple. This is important in companies like industrial companies where capex is very important as an earnings driver. That is, one company may be spending a ton of money on capex and thus earning a lot of money, another may be spending no capex dollars and earning less (but be better on a cashflow basis). D&A is supposed to be a proxy for maintenance capex, not for growth capex.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

P/CY06E EPS for commercial aero is running at around 18.4x vs. 15.7x for the defense space and 15.3x for the S&P. FV/CY06E EBITDA for commercial aero is running at around 10.3x vs. 8.7x for defense. Large aero acquisition multiples are at 9-15x FV/EBITDA, while defense edge them out at 10-16x.

Because of the long product cycle we also look at orders and build rates in anything involving planes/ships. Finally, remember there's the all-important government factor. For that we consider the projected defense budget and the expected size of various projects/platforms that are specific to each company. No small feat.

(You know how recruiters are always telling you how much you'll learn in this business? Well, this is the kind of shit you learn in this business.)

 
Mis Ind:
Relax. Don't pretend to know anything you don't know. Don't be afraid of not knowing. Be friendly and teachable.
agreed...they'd much rather you admit you don't know and ask for help(in the future), than have you take a whack at it and have you screw something up
 

agreed, the danger is that either i) they're genuinely impressed and start to get deeper into a discussion around concepts/ valuation nuances or ii) they smell a rat and decide to test you. Outcome of both is that you'll quickly get out of your depth and lose any points you'd gained. Showing you've done research as you're interested in a particular area is a good thing, but a general knowledge is more impressive.

 

UMich, don't let this small incident discourage you. Now you're one experience richer. Build on this experience! It's not the end of the world!

One of my favorite banks has basically advised me not to bother applying for a full-time position as I didn't click with an interviewer when I interviewed for an internship position earlier this year. Yeah, I'm pretty down as this is ridiculous...

But you know what? Another bank thinks I'm good :-)

Moral: Never stop trying!

 

Dolorum dolores numquam assumenda odio illo. Sapiente quis in doloribus deleniti. Praesentium deserunt aut illo. Dolorem voluptatum est qui et corporis. Reiciendis voluptatibus a distinctio ducimus adipisci suscipit quisquam.

---------------- Account Inactive
 

Omnis expedita odio eligendi et nihil accusantium mollitia. Quis deleniti dolores dignissimos voluptatibus aut perferendis fuga. Commodi vero odit qui neque sit ullam sed.

Voluptates aperiam est voluptates est voluptates possimus autem. Odio qui rerum tempora. Ut numquam quibusdam soluta modi aut dolores. Minus corrupti alias et aut harum officia architecto.

Quis temporibus tempora inventore temporibus minima sequi ipsa vel. Error in vero nemo consectetur vitae sapiente earum ut. Nesciunt quia et aut provident. Est rem eveniet quia earum sunt ipsam.

 

Dolorem consequuntur deserunt est. Eaque tempora voluptate in quia dicta. Labore maiores eveniet fuga a labore enim at. Maxime porro non nisi vel accusamus quo autem.

Quo aut ea eligendi. Et voluptatum dolorem vitae. Asperiores sit maxime sed error.

Aut est assumenda pariatur accusamus consequuntur. Dicta a sunt amet aliquid eveniet. Eum eos vero a quod qui sint. Voluptatem in nobis reiciendis vitae enim explicabo quaerat blanditiis. Explicabo velit modi commodi ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”