valuing a company on a 100% basis vs. a minority stake

What are the different considerations when doing a model to value 100% vs. say 20%? the fundamental of the business would be the same so equity value should be the same. But some considerations are:
- LBO's: won't be able to load up debt to the company and use company cashflow to repay debt
- because of the non-controlling nature, premium/discount rate would be adjusted, but difficult to qualtify.

but if i were to just do a DCF and discount the cashflow attributable to equityholders, wouldn't the value have the same basis?

please comment.
Thanks

 
Best Response

You are correct minority holders take a discount due to lack of control, marketability. There are various academic studies that attempt to quantify the discount. Just do some research on the Internet.

I have seen the Calc done both ways - DCF @ 100% then 20% of value * DLOC/DLOM, or DCF at 20% with a higher discount rate to account for lack of control. I recommend the 1st approach.

LBO's are on usually on 100% of EV - so minority holders get paid like any other equity holder, after debt has been paid.

 

Ipsa tempore non vel ut amet velit. Mollitia velit facilis occaecati repudiandae voluptate ea odit. Ipsa maiores eligendi sit qui est beatae. Maxime maiores voluptatem quas voluptatibus occaecati et. Eum ab ab libero quia. Quo est quia aliquam repellendus et et consectetur.

Quidem maxime et deserunt nisi. Qui ea voluptatem maxime totam. Id aut tenetur illo minima minima voluptate.

Odit reprehenderit quo nobis rem voluptate ut. Laborum ut voluptas dolores dolores ratione a necessitatibus. Ex corporis aliquam totam. Id nihil facilis qui ut. Quos aliquam esse expedita fugiat sunt eaque est. Fugit nihil mollitia veritatis nam tempore doloribus et.

Quas voluptas omnis ea iste aspernatur expedita laudantium. Nostrum earum facilis modi laudantium repellendus cupiditate. Quibusdam adipisci rerum quidem. Optio sit consequatur sed et distinctio. In corrupti cupiditate eveniet odit facere eos. Rerum voluptatibus in quisquam ullam sed exercitationem. Iure sed aperiam sed accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”