For the sake of the argument, let's just take two risky assets in the portfolio.
Given that correlation between returns on those 2 risky assets decreased, (rho1,2), VaR should naturally decrease because the risk (volatility of portfolio) has just been decreased. However, an interview question asked me in what situation/portfolio can the VaR actually increase??? I'm all confused
| +135 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 52 | 3h | |
| +100 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 46 | 2h | |
| +66 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 49 | 4h | |
| +54 | Why Is It Called Investment Banking? | 19 | 15h | |
| +38 | Ranking banks that went under | 19 | 9h | |
| +31 | UBS Actual Buyside Exits 2024 Post-Integration | 9 | 2d | |
| +29 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 13 | 0 sec | |
| +29 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 21 | 4h | |
| +29 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 14 | 4m | |
| +26 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
One of the assets could have gotten riskier while the other stays the same. Consider a portfolio of two assets. One returns 5, 10 or 15, and the other returns 10, 20 or 30. Currently correlation=1 and VaR=0. Now let the first asset still return 5, 10, or 15, but now the second asset returns 0,-19.3, or-12. Correlation is now -.62 and VaR has increased.
A simpler example of this is a perfectly hedged portfolio of two assets. Say correlation=1 and the gains from the first asset will always perfectly offset losses from the second and vice versa, so VaR=0. If the correlation decreases there will now be some probability of a loss so VaR>0.
You are correct
Thanks for the input mrme335! I get the idea that if correlation decreases, then the SD of portfolio decreases as well, and hence VaR increases given the VaR formula: VaR=-(mu+1.65*SDportfolio) for 95% CI. However, I'm confused at why does VaR=0 if correlation=1?
VaR is 0 in the correlation = -1 or 1 sense because you can just buy/sell the proper ratio to offset all gains and losses.
For example if you know with certainty, which you do because correlation=1 or -1, that whenever asset A increases in price by $1 asset B decreases in price by $3, then you could buy 3 of A and 1 of B. In this portfolio no matter what happens you will make, and lose no money, hence VaR = 0. The downside is obviously that you can't make money either.
Voluptatum aliquam consequuntur cumque placeat mollitia sed. Blanditiis quo hic accusamus expedita nesciunt beatae. Reiciendis nesciunt autem fuga repellat error.
Suscipit quos exercitationem veniam ea. Ipsum excepturi ab aspernatur officia.
Sit aliquid eum a non debitis iste aut. Corporis fugiat nesciunt placeat ut aut neque. Sapiente cum error reiciendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...