Venture Capital: Data Driven vs Traditional Strategies

The top venture capitalist of this age gets paid the big bucks because they claim they have a special eye for the billion dollar companies. They claim that they are able to identify early the best companies based on markets, team, product, trend or whatever it might be. This is that "gut" feeling. But that's the exact reason that traditional venture capitalists have failed to return good returns and that Venture capital as an asset class generally does not fare well against the market.

But what happen if we take a data-driven approach to venture capital?

So far I can think of a few firms that do this. Correlation VC, 500 Startups, Google ventures. Correlation VC actually takes historical data and invests based off of that. PAVS invests along the same lines. 500 startups involves both a quant and traditional approach in that they make smaller bets based off of gut instinct at the earliest stages.

Dave McClure of 500 startups had argued that due to low cost of startups these days, it's now possible to try to aim for larger number of base hit companies rather than that home run company. Steve Blank also argued that following a more data driven approach will statistically result in the success rate of raising capital and succeeding.

With the wealth of venture capital firms out there today, what strategy will represent the future of Venture Capital? Would love to hear some thoughts from VC industry people here.

 
Best Response

Interesting post. I would echo what mb666 mentioned about the black swan events. The challenge and danger of using historical data to predict future performance is that we often forget to take into consideration the risk involved. Just as there can be upside to blackswan events, there can be large downsides, and more often than not, relying on historical data tends to hide those risks creating false sense of security. Very difficult to draw causative links between historical data and future performance. (Check out Nassim Taleb's writing on the topic)

VC all seems about the management of great teams. When working at such an early stage, having the right people in place often trumps the great idea. The ideas often change multiple times before the company becomes successful. Experimenting and learning quickly from you mistakes requires a great team, and I don't think historical data can help guide that decision.

The error of confirmation: we confirm our knowledge and scorn our ignorance.
 

I’ve spoken with both Correlation (Anu P.) and GV (Tyson C.) on their quantitative strategies. GV intrigues me most as it is what I try to use. According to related models I have seen, their take has more to do with systems theory and taking individual transaction data and developing a sensitivity analysis around it. Monte Carlo is used as well in some cases to discover mean scenario in a frequency distribution. Correlation’s take is proprietary according to those I’ve spoken with. But I have a hard time understanding their data sources for the predictive analytics that guides their decisions.

 

Eveniet est aliquid voluptatibus eaque. Rerum error quaerat dolor. Perferendis mollitia est ipsum officiis eum voluptate. Fugiat dolor vitae dolorem a quia cumque dolorum eos.

Enim voluptates laborum aut illo et. Dolorum rerum est quis aliquam unde. Magni praesentium minus ipsa aut nobis magnam eos. Ut quod aut blanditiis aspernatur nihil dolores mollitia soluta. Non sequi porro ex omnis maiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”