• Sharebar

Hi,

I need your help.

What is the best way to respond to "walk me through an LBO model" question.

Any good advice/suggestions? Things to avoid?

Much appreciated.

15% Off Wall St. Prep Financial Modeling Training Click Here

The WSO Advantage - Land Your Dream Job

Financial Modeling Training

IB Templates, M&A, LBO, Valuation. Learn More.

Wall St. Interview Secrets Revealed

30,000+ sold & REAL questions. Learn More.

Resume Help from Finance Pros

Land More Interviews. Learn More.

Find Your Mentor

Realistic Mock Interviews. Learn More.

Comments (13)

  • Jimbo's picture

    have you built models before?

  • JAC's picture

    Yes, Merger/Accretion and discounted cash flow among others, but not LBO unfortunately.

    Any advice for an upcoming interview? I would really like to do well. Thanks.

  • BK325's picture

    If you want to go the paying route I know the tts, dealmaven, wall street prep online courses all have lbo model training components to them. Might want to take a look at that

  • JAC's picture

    Yes - I guess I should be more specific.

    I know how to build one. That is not a problem.

    But what are the general points that interviewers would like me to hit when answering this question? I am not sure how detailed it should be.

    Essentially, what is the "right" way to answer this question based on everyone else's experience?

  • Indeed's picture

    To me, somebody best demonstrates their understanding of LBO models if they can adequately explain in what context they are used. So, start off with the why: for what purpose have you built LBO models? Have you mainly done exploratory or confirmatory work, or both? In other words, do you use them as a valuation tool, pre-transaction, to "reality check" what you think a buyer may be able to pay for the business, given what you know about the amount (and type) of leverage you could put on the business, the projected cash flow profile, some assumed exit multiple, and "market" IRRs? Or have you used them to model out specific transactions, after you receive LOIs and after you have lender proposals on the table, to do sensitivity analyses on the proposed deals and capital structures?

    After you tell them what you're typically using the model for, then get into what specific areas and assumptions you usually key in on. For instance, if I'm using the model as a valuation tool, I'm going to be very attuned to leverage and returns: how much leverage can I get (ABL and cash flow), what can the company bear (not necessarily the same), what's the pricing/am on that debt, how am I going to structure my equity (all common, preferred, participating preferred, etc...), and what do my returns look like at a variety of valuations going into the deal (and assuming no multiple arbitrage at exit and at a variety of other exit multiples). The whole theory is if I know what kind of returns I'm looking for, what the company's projected cash flows will look like, what I can make the balance sheet look like in terms of capital structure, and at what valuation I can get OUT at, then I can see if what I want to pay for the business is reasonable.

    If I'm using a model as a confirmatory tool, then really I just want to make sure the assumptions are realistic on the proposed capital structure, make sure the company isn't going to blow through all their covenants if they have a flat or down year next year, and see what the returns will be to the different classes of shareholders/capital providers given a variety of scenarios (sensitivity...you get the point).

    Anyway man, I know that's a longwinded answer...I just wrote down what came to mind. Hopefully it'll give you a mental foothold and get you thinking about where to at least start. I know you haven't built one from the ground up, but if you know how, you probably know at least what they're used for and how to evaluate one. Private message me if you're still stuck after you've thought about it some more.

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

    Once more into the breach, dear friends.

  • smuguy97's picture

    "Indeed" has provided a very nice answer. At a high-level, understanding an "LBO Model" is no more complicated than understanding how to tie financial statements.

    The only difference is a one-step adjustment to the balance sheet which occurs at the time of purchase.

    Aside from that, IRRs should flow directly from cash flow distributions to each individual security (e.g., senior debt, sub-debt, mezz, seller notes, PIK notes, preferred equity and common equity).

  • KhouriC's picture

    do analysts get that question, wouldn't that be more for an associate position

    would an analyst really do an LBO model?

  • Yale1986's picture

    To unlock this content for free, please login / register below.

    Connecting helps us build a vibrant community. We'll never share your info without your permission. Sign up with email or if you are already a member, login here Bonus: Also get 6 free financial modeling lessons for free ($200+ value) when you register!