Wall Street Oasis: Suggestion Time!
So, after reading the thread "WSO is getting worse" where several users argued WSO was deteriorating while others disagreed, I figured it was time we throw together another WSO suggestion thread. These threads have helped us dramatically improve the user experience over the years, so why stop now...if you have any questions, please fire away!
In response to some of the claims in the previous thread, here was my response (admittedly, somewhat defensive):
"A similar post like this pops up about every August / September for about 4 years running when we get a new influx of college students every year, and every year, people claim the good 'ol days were better, when that is far from the truth. some facts:
1. Yes, we have more traffic than ever which means more college students. We will never stop repetitive questions 100%, but we can point users to our FAQ sections and our WSO Company Database when it is appropriate.
2. This increase in traffic also means more Certified User and professionals sharing their wisdom. See our recent rush of awesome Q&A threads: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/qa-threads and rush of Certified Users we've had in the last few months ....and since the WSO Conference in NYC.
3. We've put a lot of investment into our design which I think you will all agree is MUCH better than 1-2 years ago. See our group change, for example: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/new-design-for... ...if you saw the site back in 2006 or 2007, I don't think you'd be claiming it was better. :-)
4. @hpm, you have my personal email - if you care and have the time, would love to hear how you think WSO could improve (besides removing Bankerella). Would you like to see more investment pieces on the market? More advice on a specific industry? Advice for more senior professionals?
5. Bankerella has 2 posts per week out of ~70 that hit the home page every week...I think she's pretty easy to ignore if you want to. Yes, she definitely rubs SOME people the wrong way, but I think a lot of you take her way too seriously and you don't have to read her stuff (fyi, a lot of it is satire). The majority of the people that have the biggest problem with her are the same guys posting sexist shit about women 99% of the time...notice rufiolove and sirtradesalot, 2 our our best Certified Users going back and forth with her in the last thread. If you can't laugh at any of that, I feel bad for you.
6. We JUST launched new WSO User Guidelines a few weeks ago along with some new moderataor tools that make moderating MUCH easier. You should see a MAJOR decrease in spammish posts - especially as we encourage more of our regular users to use the Flag Post feature more frequently (on every comment/post). this has already reduced our mod time ~10x....we just need to get our mods and regular users to participate.
7. We continue to build out our FAQ area which has links to some of our best content by industry. We will be putting a detailed Q&A section in there that highlights the best interviews from our Certified Users as well. we also continue to add to our Finance Dictionary (which is hyperlinked in the forums to make sure people aren't asking what WACC and BB means...)
8. We didn't have the WSO Company Database or my feed functionality 1-2 years ago.
Maybe I'm blinded since my head is in the weeds and not in the forums every day, but I like to think we're moving in the right direction with better content, better tools and more interesting debates as the userbase matures. I think we can still have some fun along the way while we teach each other and give each other advice. We've already been cracking down on some of the more immature / drama users to reduce the bullshit debates, but we need help of all users to flag posts that violate our User Guidelines.
Either way, if you think we have gone downhill, I'd ask you please to give me specifics...I think we were due for another "WSO - Suggestion thread", so let me hear it in here, or if you guys want I can throw one up on the home page tonight?"






Had a question about the user
Had a question about the user bar on top...is there any way we can add a functionality to hide/unhide it?
thanks
General Disarray: Had a
Had a question about the user bar on top...is there any way we can add a functionality to hide/unhide it?
thanks
Added to our to do list.
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat
This is my contribution from
This is my contribution from the other thread:
"First my suggestion would be to force all visitors of the site to register. Then when a thread is created, all members contributing to the thread should be again forced to either rank it with a SB/Neutral/MS. Threads with overwhelming negative votes would be closed."
My rationale for this is that those complaining would have some degree of power in regards to whether a post is useful/informative/etc..
Here to learn and hopefully pass on some knowledge as well. SB if I helped.
That_Aston: This is my
This is my contribution from the other thread:
"First my suggestion would be to force all visitors of the site to register. Then when a thread is created, all members contributing to the thread should be again forced to either rank it with a SB/Neutral/MS. Threads with overwhelming negative votes would be closed."
My rationale for this is that those complaining would have some degree of power in regards to whether a post is useful/informative/etc..
Force all visitors to the site to register? In order to post, you need to register...is that what you mean?
As far as a thread having overwhelming negative votes...a few of Bankerella's threads, for example, have had a net negative count, but they also have some of the highest level of Silver Bananas...so it's not as easy as setting a certain level to "lock" a thread. and would it be locked (ie, no more comments), unpublished, deleted, etc....?
how about if you don't like a user, you can block them and they won't show up in your feed for you or in the comments? Personally, I think that is a waste of web dev time since you can just ignore certain threads you don't want to read or from certain authors, but I can see if this is possible without too many hours (or if it would put an extra strain on the server when loading pages to see if the user that is loading the page doesnt want to see comments from a certain user....)
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat
Make the site less addictive.
Make the site less addictive.
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
WallStreetOasis.com: That_A
This is my contribution from the other thread:
"First my suggestion would be to force all visitors of the site to register. Then when a thread is created, all members contributing to the thread should be again forced to either rank it with a SB/Neutral/MS. Threads with overwhelming negative votes would be closed."
My rationale for this is that those complaining would have some degree of power in regards to whether a post is useful/informative/etc..
Force all visitors to the site to register? In order to post, you need to register...is that what you mean?
As far as a thread having overwhelming negative votes...a few of Bankerella's threads, for example, have had a net negative count, but they also have some of the highest level of Silver Bananas...so it's not as easy as setting a certain level to "lock" a thread. and would it be locked (ie, no more comments), unpublished, deleted, etc....?
how about if you don't like a user, you can block them and they won't show up in your feed for you or in the comments? Personally, I think that is a waste of web dev time since you can just ignore certain threads you don't want to read or from certain authors, but I can see if this is possible without too many hours (or if it would put an extra strain on the server when loading pages to see if the user that is loading the page doesnt want to see comments from a certain user....)
Blocking would suffice for me. Also, a Hall of Fame forum section with content from years past could be helpful too.
Here to learn and hopefully pass on some knowledge as well. SB if I helped.
How about providing all users
How about providing all users with 5 (or w.e. amount) of free wso credits at the beginning of each month or quarter. It would allow more users to better rate useful content.
prudentinvestor: How about
How about providing all users with 5 (or w.e. amount) of free wso credits at the beginning of each month or quarter. It would allow more users to better rate useful content.
We are rewarding WSO credits daily to users that give the most helpful responses and liquidity has increased a LOT. For every 100 banana points you will also now be getting 5 WSO Credits.
We need to make sure bananaflation doesn't get too out of control...
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat
SirTradesaLot: Make the site
Make the site less addictive.
No. How can we make it more addictive? More discussions on personal investing? I think trading ideas for the personal investor would be interesting. I've been trading more recently and know I could use some more ideas...similar to Seeking Alpha, but because of our active userbase, I'm sure we could get even more comments on average than seeking alpha to bounce the idea back and forth.
I mean, if you look @ all of the Facebook discussions leading up to the IPO, almost every single member claimed it was way overvalued...I think we could get the Trading forum more active with investing threads like this...
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat
how about user ignore? that
how about user ignore? that way just bc you don't like bankerella, all the other virgins can continue to drool over her.
This is my contribution from the other thread:
"First my suggestion would be to force all visitors of the site to register. Then when a thread is created, all members contributing to the thread should be again forced to either rank it with a SB/Neutral/MS. Threads with overwhelming negative votes would be closed."
My rationale for this is that those complaining would have some degree of power in regards to whether a post is useful/informative/etc..
Force all visitors to the site to register? In order to post, you need to register...is that what you mean?
As far as a thread having overwhelming negative votes...a few of Bankerella's threads, for example, have had a net negative count, but they also have some of the highest level of Silver Bananas...so it's not as easy as setting a certain level to "lock" a thread. and would it be locked (ie, no more comments), unpublished, deleted, etc....?
how about if you don't like a user, you can block them and they won't show up in your feed for you or in the comments? Personally, I think that is a waste of web dev time since you can just ignore certain threads you don't want to read or from certain authors, but I can see if this is possible without too many hours (or if it would put an extra strain on the server when loading pages to see if the user that is loading the page doesnt want to see comments from a certain user....)
Blocking would suffice for me. Also, a Hall of Fame forum section with content from years past could be helpful too.
If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
A list of the most active
A list of the most active groups.
Sometimes a group looks interesting, but there is no real activity in it.
wish there was an easy way to
wish there was an easy way to be able to isolate the threads that were 1) in a certain time period (let's say last 2-3 days or something) AND 2) that had greater than X # of replies and sorted by # of replies...this way you can quickly hone in on threads that were popular and recent but didn't necessarily make the home page instead of trying to manually find them. i see that theres a page that shows the highest ranked discussions in the last week which i guess is somewhat similar to what i'm sayin, but i suspect a fair amount of useful (or at least entertaining) threads can slip thru the cracks, and would rather see something based on user popularity based on # of replies within the last few days
In headaches and in worry
Vaguely life leaks away
And Time will have his fancy
Tomorrow or today.
An insider info forum would
An insider info forum would be nice
The ability to delete your
The ability to delete your post if you haven't been quoted yet.
" A recession is when other people lose their job, a depression is when you lose your job. "
I'm a college student and
I'm a college student and visit WSO regularly. It can be an incredible tool and forum to learn from professionals, as well as others pursuing finance. However, there are certainly some people (often college and high school) that post and pm some unreal, mind blowing, dumb, oblivious shit. Posts about what jeans, shirts, socks, etc. do bankers wear are fucking painful. Not only are these the dumbest waste of internet space, but they have been answered millions of times before! If you aren't willing to at least do some research to answer you questions about what toothpaste bankers use, fuck you twice. If there were some way to stop these rediculous posts or at least penalize them, I think that would help. Repostings aren't the problem, or eventually there would be nothing to talk about. But jeans once, eh. Jeans twice, shame on you. Nevertheless, love the site and have sincerely learned a lot about banking.
1.) It's nice to know when
Work hard, play hard.
Didn't read all, but I find
IlliniProgrammer: Create a
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
I think Patrick should adopt
The.RealDeal: The ability to
The Auto Show
IlliniProgrammer: Create a
huanleshalemei: I'd like to
huanleshalemei: The.RealDea
" A recession is when other people lose their job, a depression is when you lose your job. "
THIS!!! IlliniProgrammer: 1
If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
WallStreetOasis.com: SirTra
Here's the thing. If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, you are the sucker.
and I put an emphasis on VERY
Here's the thing. If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, you are the sucker.
It's a great website. I
Gun Control Discussion
an official list of the
historiclegend: Didn't read
Didn't read all, but I find
I know a lot of people want
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
I love this website and think
I help people with the tough situation of not knowing how to respond to emails.
This forum is about
IlliniProgrammer: 1.) It's
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat
It's been mentioned above,
Going Concern: wish there was
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat
Silver bananas as soldier of
I help people with the tough situation of not knowing how to respond to emails.
WallStreetOasis.com: here are
In headaches and in worry
Vaguely life leaks away
And Time will have his fancy
Tomorrow or today.
historiclegend: Didn't read
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat
To everyone complaining about
You're born, you take shit. You get out in the world, you take more shit. You climb a little higher, you take less shit. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what shit even looks like. Welcome to the layer cake, son.
Mods should get more liberal
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
kyleyboy: i feel like we
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
SirTradesaLot: kyleyboy: i
I help people with the tough situation of not knowing how to respond to emails.
kyleyboy: SirTradesaLot:
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
How do i get to the chatroom?
When evaluating whether or not to post something on WSO, I think to myself, "would an idiot post this" and if the answer is yes, I do not post that thing...
I think Patrick should give
peepstache: How do i get to
I post here because I was
In the Company Database you
-RR
RonaldReagan: In the Company
WSO Conference 2013
Private Certified User Chat