Fastest growing investment bank, in terms of revenues. LevFin is very strong, consistently places very well into the bayside. Other groups do well too, but I just know specifically that LevFin stands out. Great place to be, and Charlotte is a great place to be, doesn't quite have the buy side recruiting exposure, but if you work hard enough and have a good experience, getting into a megafund is possible.

"My name's Ralph Cox, and I'm from where ever's not gonna get me hit"
 

They are still among the top ten banks on a revenue/fees basis and loved (financially) by Buffett. Not a bad choice if OP wants a career in banking or MM exit opportunities.

>Incoming Ash Ketchum, Pokemon Master >Literally a problem, solve for both X and Y, please and thank you. >Hugh Myron: "Are there any guides on here for getting a top girlfriend? Think banker/lawyer/doctor. I really don't want to go mid-tier"
 

still kinda crappy.. they've been doing really well for themselves, and i personally kinda like the bank, but they have still yet to grab BB status. other than lev fin i wud choose your normal BBs at the junior level.

 

you see them mostly on balance sheet related deals (also strength in lev fin) but not much for M&A. still a very profitable firm and surprisingly pays top bonuses since the bank has had little to no issues since the financial crises unlike its other BB peers; job security is great as well.

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 
AnalystMonkey2769:

you see them mostly on balance sheet related deals (also strength in lev fin) but not much for M&A. still a very profitable firm and surprisingly pays top bonuses since the bank has had little to no issues since the financial crises unlike its other BB peers; job security is great as well.

I said nothing negative or wrong...actually said they are very profitable, give great bonuses and offer strong job security?

why the monkey shit? lol not that it matters but wtvr

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 

Thanks for the opinions folks... Any other insight? Obviously they're not BB yet, but do they seem like they're on track to be? If not, what's holding them back? If so, what are their next logical steps? What are they doing to get there? From what I've heard they've brought in a lot of people from other BBs and have even had some of their staff poached by other BBs, so it would seem from a staffing perspective they're moving closer.

 

Some groups are poaching talent from other firms in an attempt to win bigger advisory mandates. However, the bank's so focused on its conservative culture that it's often not willing to try to win deals when they can get debt deals done so easily with their balance sheet.

Overall- bank with good culture; likely to get good experience on the debt side; growing fast, but still not very well-respected among the big boys; pay is on par or above the Street numbers; exit opps relatively weak from what I hear; good job security

 
TheBlueCheese:

Some groups are poaching talent from other firms in an attempt to win bigger advisory mandates. However, the bank's so focused on its conservative culture that it's often not willing to try to win deals when they can get debt deals done so easily with their balance sheet.

Overall- bank with good culture; likely to get good experience on the debt side; growing fast, but still not very well-respected among the big boys; pay is on par or above the Street numbers; exit opps relatively weak from what I hear; good job security

this is exactly what I said. yet I got monkey shit for it. interesting....

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 

I imagine they are a reasonably conservative IBD in relation.

Id go with the majority and say good job security and a culture of the broader business i.e how they wrote loans, no subprime. Their lending sides culture will slowly be integrated through the Wachovia purchase and reflected in their IBD. Their top line in IBD is the highest growing of any of their divisions and something like up over a 1/3, albeit off a much smaller base, and they got a bit in the Heinz takeover. Which i guess indicates a Buffet tick.

Catching up to the BB's. Might they be classified as a BB as well soon... (according to; dealogic, thestreet - the news website not 'i heard it on the street' and and their 1Q 2013.)

 
DotteringandSpl...:

Catching up to the BB's. Might they be classified as a BB as well soon... (according to; dealogic, thestreet - the news website not 'i heard it on the street' and and their 1Q 2013.)

I hope you were hallucinating when you posted this.

http://fn.dealogic.com/fn/MARank.htm

http://www.bloomberg.com/professional/files/2013/04/2013-q1-global-fina…

 

Though people think that M&A is the one and only thing in banking that matters, as other people were saying previously, Wells' bread and butter is in financing. They've had the fastest fee growth on the street in the past few years. If you're looking from a pure M&A perspective obviously they aren't a BB. But they are the biggest bank by market cap in the world and their banking platform is still growing into the size of the rest of the bank

 
Best Response
AnalystMonkey2769:
TheBlueCheese:

Some groups are poaching talent from other firms in an attempt to win bigger advisory mandates. However, the bank's so focused on its conservative culture that it's often not willing to try to win deals when they can get debt deals done so easily with their balance sheet.

Overall- bank with good culture; likely to get good experience on the debt side; growing fast, but still not very well-respected among the big boys; pay is on par or above the Street numbers; exit opps relatively weak from what I hear; good job security

this is exactly what I said. yet I got monkey shit for it. interesting....

Dude, someone gave you virtual shit on a finance forum. That's two posts complaining about it. Get over it.

 
stvr2013:
AnalystMonkey2769:


TheBlueCheese:

Some groups are poaching talent from other firms in an attempt to win bigger advisory mandates. However, the bank's so focused on its conservative culture that it's often not willing to try to win deals when they can get debt deals done so easily with their balance sheet.

Overall- bank with good culture; likely to get good experience on the debt side; growing fast, but still not very well-respected among the big boys; pay is on par or above the Street numbers; exit opps relatively weak from what I hear; good job security

this is exactly what I said. yet I got monkey shit for it. interesting....

Dude, someone gave you virtual shit on a finance forum. That's two posts complaining about it. Get over it.

+1 for you

 
peinvestor2012:
DotteringandSpl...:

Catching up to the BB's. Might they be classified as a BB as well soon... (according to; dealogic, thestreet - the news website not 'i heard it on the street' and and their 1Q 2013.)

I hope you were hallucinating when you posted this.

http://fn.dealogic.com/fn/MARank.htm

http://www.bloomberg.com/professional/files/2013/0...

Did you happen to notice that WF's market share went up from 0.8 to 6% globally and 2.1 to 10.7% in the US? And that their volume in America for 2013 Q1 is only 3MM shy of its volume for all of 2012?

Sure, still not a BB but it seems to be making gains

 

Thats pretty much the point i was emphasising, the fact that there doing a good job of gainng market share and growth. However in saying that, im wondering if the 1Q will be a bit of an aberration, did it include the Heinz deal, because if so; a deal that big may not happen again this year plus as mentioned above, they weren't really any close to the left (lead) of the page on the announcement.

 
stillsleepy:

Searched and saw some older threads, but haven't really seen anything as of late. Curious what word on the street is (or any other opinions or comments the community may have) regarding WF IB.

From what I've read so far, sounds like they've been pretty successful since building out the platform ~5 years ago through the acquisition of Wachovia and recently growth has been pretty good. Advising on the Heinz deal seems like a pretty big mandate too..

Just curious if anyone works for them, has worked for them, or has any other insight?

Heinz deal is a bit of a misnomer. Lazard was the lead financial adviser and then JP and Wells (to the right of JP) advised the consortium. What this really means is that they provided financing and received league table credit for the M&A advisory, so in that regard it is more a case of acquisition financing masquerading as M&A. This happens a lot and across firms many of their "M&A" credit on deals will be this type of credit. It's tough to place that much financing without multiple balance sheet banks (like Citi/JPM/WF/BAML) on the transaction.

 
rufiolove:
stillsleepy:

Searched and saw some older threads, but haven't really seen anything as of late. Curious what word on the street is (or any other opinions or comments the community may have) regarding WF IB.

From what I've read so far, sounds like they've been pretty successful since building out the platform ~5 years ago through the acquisition of Wachovia and recently growth has been pretty good. Advising on the Heinz deal seems like a pretty big mandate too..

Just curious if anyone works for them, has worked for them, or has any other insight?

Heinz deal is a bit of a misnomer. Lazard was the lead financial adviser and then JP and Wells (to the right of JP) advised the consortium. What this really means is that they provided financing and received league table credit for the M&A advisory, so in that regard it is more a case of acquisition financing masquerading as M&A. This happens a lot and across firms many of their "M&A" credit on deals will be this type of credit. It's tough to place that much financing without multiple balance sheet banks (like Citi/JPM/WF/BAML) on the transaction.

Right, this is sort of what I thought too. As has been mentioned, maybe not necessarily a bad way to build out the platform, but at the same time makes me wonder how much true growth they're getting and market share they have to gain.

Appreciate the insight folks. Will be watching them closely.

 
parctribe:

Did you happen to notice that WF's market share went up from 0.8 to 6% globally and 2.1 to 10.7% in the US? And that their volume in America for 2013 Q1 is only 3MM shy of its volume for all of 2012?

Sure, still not a BB but it seems to be making gains

For one quarter... and it slid to 3.4% according to Dealogic's data through yesterday. Every BB is within the Top 10 and WFC is 17th globally, 16th in the U.S.

Let's see how the year pans out. Nobody is saying WFC isn't improving, but it's a long ways from solidifying itself still on the M&A front. It doesn't help that it is purely U.S.-focused (25 out of 26 total M&A deals were U.S. deals).

 
rufiolove:
stillsleepy:

Searched and saw some older threads, but haven't really seen anything as of late. Curious what word on the street is (or any other opinions or comments the community may have) regarding WF IB.

From what I've read so far, sounds like they've been pretty successful since building out the platform ~5 years ago through the acquisition of Wachovia and recently growth has been pretty good. Advising on the Heinz deal seems like a pretty big mandate too..

Just curious if anyone works for them, has worked for them, or has any other insight?

Heinz deal is a bit of a misnomer. Lazard was the lead financial adviser and then JP and Wells (to the right of JP) advised the consortium. What this really means is that they provided financing and received league table credit for the M&A advisory, so in that regard it is more a case of acquisition financing masquerading as M&A. This happens a lot and across firms many of their "M&A" credit on deals will be this type of credit. It's tough to place that much financing without multiple balance sheet banks (like Citi/JPM/WF/BAML) on the transaction.

Wouldn't you say that is likely the case with several transactions they are included on? Not saying it isn't the case for BS banks (JPM, BAML), but even more so for a group trying to build its M&A reputation and practice?

 

Yes. That's basically what I was getting at. Many other banks like Citi/JPM/BAML will encounter a similar situation, but for Wells, I would expect that most of their large M&A deals are that type of situation. I just don't know that they would compete on pure advisory mandates unless they vastly undercut on fees. I could be wrong, but that's my expectation. For their pure M&A advisory I think their bread and butter tends to be in the mid market with the likes of RBC / Baird / Jefferies / Harris Williams etc.

 

Could it also be partly due to the culture their trying to establish. Because they are a BS bank and that their culture is much less risk - than its wall street brethren - so could that be instead of trying to give advice they are sticking to what they have excelled at analysing loan risk? so leveraging that in the M&A market? instead of spending alot of money on laterals with set salaries for rainmakers.

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/finance-dictionary/what-is-the-bulge-bracket-BB><abbr title=bulge bracket&#10;>BB</abbr></a></span>.MandA.3rdyear:
Could be a decent lower/mid market player with barrington.

they could be, but i think their corporate culture is too relaxed. i spoke with someone who works there and they said that one of their associates here back in Q2-2006 pulled the offices first all-nighter and that it was a momentous moment + they only work about 60 hours/week.

 

Its a good name, but I doubt it will get you into a megafund. MM PE, sure. Why not

As an analyst at wells that started on Monday, this thread makes me :'(

A lot of IBD goes down at Charlotte. All of the industry groups are at least partially located there. This is because Charlotte was Wachovia's hub for IBD, and Wells didnt really have much of an Ibanking practice prior to the merger

Its also not a pure advisory practice. The Corporate Bank at Wells has a gigantic balance sheet, and debt products from IB will be parked on Corp Banking's balance sheet for the term. Theres no trading, but that doesnt mean there are no capital markets. It just means we retain whatever portions of the syndication we underwrite.

Array
 

Also, at least in Charlotte, the culture is incredibly relaxed. Some of the chillest dudes i've ever met.

I've heard that the other offices are more stuck up and less jovial altogether. Could be a myth, but I KNOW that any group would be hard-pressed to surpass WF Charlotte in terms of an awesome culture. This is because Wachovia employees were cool as shit, and WF people are more mundane in comparison. A lot of legacy wachovia people stayed in charlotte.

Array
 

M&A and Industrials in NYC is also strong. Considering M&A is growing year over year at Wells and is shifting to NYC, seems like a solid group to be in.

 

I wouldn't want to work for WFC because of the likelihood of getting placed in N Carolina.

From an investing standpoint, I think WFC is a great buying opportunity given their position in mortgages and the rise of their wholesale units.

WSO Writer | View my blog
 
anaxi:
I wouldn't want to work for WFC because of the likelihood of getting placed in N Carolina.

From an investing standpoint, I think WFC is a great buying opportunity given their position in mortgages and the rise of their wholesale units.

Bought them last year when it was trading ~23.
 
anaxi:
I wouldn't want to work for WFC because of the likelihood of getting placed in N Carolina.

From an investing standpoint, I think WFC is a great buying opportunity given their position in mortgages and the rise of their wholesale units.

Charlotte is the reason why Im trying to lateral -_-
Array
 

I think that it is unlikely that WF will ever be viewed as a top/elite/prestigious IB, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Their senior management views i-banking as simply another service to offer their clients. This will likely continue to play well in the middle market and with companies that don't want to work with a "wall street" firm. That said, they aren't going to supplant GS/MS with that focus.

 

Lack of good bars. Lack of good restaurants. Lack of intelligent general population ( cant stand typical southern ideologies). Its basically a large town, rather than a small city. Almost completely monoculture. Impossible to network with employees of any institution other than WF and BAML (if I lived in a real city, I'd be cold-contacting people all the time and asking to meet for coffee)

Array
 

Coming from a Carolina school, and Charlotte being a target while NYC is semi, How would the compensation and exit opportunities be coming out of Charlotte IB? How about WF and BAML in particular?

 
thepman:
Coming from a Carolina school, and Charlotte being a target while NYC is semi, How would the compensation and exit opportunities be coming out of Charlotte IB? How about WF and BAML in particular?

I'm pretty sure the Charlotte vs. NYC/Chic has been talked about a lot on here.

Comp is pretty similar at both BBs in Charlotte/NYC Exit Opps are def better in NYC.. always.

As far as the city itself - It really depends what stage of life you're in. If you're young and looking for a radiant town with bars/clubs/young people all over the place, Charlotte may not be enough for you. There are a fair amount of places to go out, but like someone said before it is a very SMALL city. It's likely that if you're into clubs, you'll be going to the same places every few weeks (at least).

But if you're in the latter stages of life and settling down (e.g. wife/kids), Charlotte is a very ideal place.. nice weather, nice people, good pay, and lower cost of living.

I've done both and like both for what they are.

 
oldmansacks:
fuck charlotte. its pretty much just WF guys here now, with a few suntrusts and bbnts. BAML is pretty much gone. its a growing city but its far a cry from being a "real city". unless you are a born and raised southerner, i'd stay away esp if u are single and in your early twenties. southern culture is so dry.

BofA is pretty much gone? Have you not seen their big trading floor in Hearst Tower? Or the fact that Bank of America has more buildings than any bank in Charlotte? Maybe you're just talking about the Merril Lynch side of the business? Curious.

 

I've talked with one IBD MD in NYC that was pretty cool. Their strong lending position allows WF to have some great connections for ancillary revenue (M&A, ECM, advisory, etc) which as well all know is the true name of the game. Either way, he not only said he is glad to work at a growing investment banking division but it is also very conservative, implying that the growth is sustainable and will not f anything up if macro economic factors don't improve. He also loved that they get to work on some MM deals that are more interesting and non-cookie cutter than the megadeals. To an analyst, you might not love that idea, but for an MD who has had his rounds at top tier BBs it made the place sound like a great place to be.

 

let's be honest, Wells Fargo isn't a bad place to work at. but no way in hell they can even be compared to the other big banks in terms of recruiting for buyside jobs. no, almost all headhunters won't give a damn (notice the "almost" here... exceptions do apply of course) if you are from wells when they are submitting resumes for the top funds.

either you go to a lower MM shop or you get out and lateral, simple

 

Curious if there are groups within WF that are more well established than others. Essentially, what are they known for? This applies to all of their offices: NY, Charlotte, Chi, Houston, SF...

"Now watch this drive." -W.
 

Wells Fargo needs to buy an investment bank if it wants to start playing in the big leagues.

In the last 12 months they have only done $28 billion in M&A, and that puts them behind Jefferies, Moelis, Centerview, and Tudor Pickering Holt (TPH). If they want to quickly start playing with JPM and BAML as big balance sheet investment banks they should buy Morgan Stanley (market cap of only $27B).

If they want to slowly grow, they could buy a few of these other ibanks and start rolling them up.

No way they get there organically.

 

B-School, they bought Wachovia. It takes time.

You also mentioned TPH. I dont know where you got your information, but they are an energy only ibank that has been around for 7ish years. I would call whatever size they are at to be both organic and rapid. While they are a strong energy ibank, I dont believe they are anywhere close to the levels of Jefferies or any bank larger on a national or international level.

"Now watch this drive." -W.
 
Conan Sobroen:
B-School, they bought Wachovia. It takes time.

You also mentioned TPH. I dont know where you got your information, but they are an energy only ibank that has been around for 7ish years. I would call whatever size they are at to be both organic and rapid. While they are a strong energy ibank, I dont believe they are anywhere close to the levels of Jefferies or any bank larger on a national or international level.

@ Conan Sobroen

Dude, TPH has grown rapidly, but that occurred because Bobby Tudor pulled out some of the Goldman Energy group. The senior folks from that group who did not spin off to form TPH went to Evercore and Moelis. "Organic" is in the eye of the beholder. The reason those guys attracted the top talent that they did was because they are a private partnership. I find it hard to believe that you really thing that WF would be able to poach serious senior bankers from a shop like Goldman or Morgan Stanley by waving corporate bank stock at them.

As for Jefferies, more than half of M&A deal credit comes from energy banking because they bought the energy Randall & Dewey in 2005 the core of which continues to be the majority of their deal flow. The only reason Jefferies is above Wells Fargo in the league tables is because of that acquisition. Do a CapIQ or Factset pull and you will realize that buying TPH would put them right behind UBS in domestic deal flow. How do you think the bulge bracket shops got bigger?

If Wells Fargo wants to build out an I-Bank they should do exactly what the shops before them did, buy someone.

DB bought Alex Brown and Bankers Trust UBS bought Kidder Peabody when it bought Paine Webber and it also bought Dillon Read & Co. Credit Suisse bought First Boston and DLJ BarCap bought Lehman, who had bought Kuhn Loeb and merged with E. F. Hutton when it was owned by Amex

If you are going to question someone's knowledge you had better know what you are talking about. Do some reading, a little book learning could do you some good.

 

Know someone who is an associate and works ~70 hour weeks in one of the easier groups. (if that makes any sense, not trying to outright name it)

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 

Its a great place to go if you do not mind knowing that every BB doesn't even know that your company has an investment banking arm and you don't mind making half as much as any at a BB 3 years later

 

Before the Wachovia merger Wells Fargo IB platform was weak. post merger some now consider them a BB some don't. They do bigger deals then MM ibanks but they also have a MM advisory group. There is not a huge difference in pay. I know kids in Charlotte making street and saving close to 70% of their pay annually. The guys there are more laid back and chill than other banks west coast style baby!

 

Most of the Wachovia groups are still at Wells Fargo, and it seems like a pretty reasonable place to work from the folks I have talked with. I doubt that you are going to be pushing the envelope there or working on that many front page WSJ transactions, but as far as a bank with a ton of upside and very little downside, Wells Fargo is a pretty reasonable choice.

 

Aut aliquid voluptatum quos in quae. Magnam aliquam sit vel ex. Nam assumenda totam minus. Rerum veritatis possimus quaerat quia totam aut illo veniam. Ullam deleniti quo illum consequatur. Atque sit modi laborum voluptate. Ducimus quod inventore ipsa ducimus deleniti qui. Ullam occaecati fuga nihil modi non.

In nihil quae perferendis eum. At ratione voluptatem facilis possimus. Consequatur maiores aut nobis est. Rerum excepturi exercitationem consequatur omnis. Voluptas quia dolor aut autem tempora voluptas. Eos iste aut consequatur molestiae qui. Iure quam alias explicabo quaerat quia aliquid esse.

 

Tenetur quia inventore nam id laboriosam. Debitis ut error tempore delectus dolorem aspernatur id totam. Vel aut aperiam qui sed suscipit ipsa ipsum. Unde voluptatem quam natus est animi quasi.

Ipsum qui itaque voluptas et voluptatibus quidem aperiam. Sit laboriosam atque veniam quas vero. Aut eum sit aspernatur rem quas ut.

Sit ratione aspernatur enim sed sit. Ea et eaque tempora quia quidem dolorem. Unde aut necessitatibus corporis nihil et. Praesentium excepturi eos consequatur. Consequatur facere modi enim maiores expedita ut.

Qui quos nisi dolore facere iste rerum. Provident qui ratione quia in. Facilis cupiditate dolorem consequatur magni voluptas. Ut nesciunt saepe voluptatem quae. Similique suscipit eum non deleniti nobis sunt. Qui doloremque qui voluptas necessitatibus recusandae dolores.

 

Doloribus itaque tenetur quos omnis nisi magni. Et atque eius quo excepturi. Nulla consequatur consequatur ducimus eum optio corporis ratione. Harum perspiciatis et vero consequatur provident alias iusto. Ipsam voluptatem rerum dolorum eligendi architecto.

Porro non architecto ut et accusamus. Molestiae voluptatum veritatis non. Consequatur praesentium iste sit dolorem sint omnis.

Repellendus accusamus in quam ut natus tempore beatae. Dolor vel eveniet quo.

 

Reiciendis soluta nihil neque sed a autem. Totam ea quidem quia esse. Facere qui et aliquam. Accusantium omnis voluptate rerum placeat quia aperiam et corrupti. Magnam voluptate et ullam qui asperiores error mollitia minima.

Beatae earum non deleniti tempora aspernatur cumque. Voluptatem porro rerum itaque velit. Saepe dolorem et culpa.

Sequi quis recusandae neque facere voluptates voluptas perferendis et. Fugit sint voluptates rerum sit ea ratione qui. Odit necessitatibus accusantium porro voluptas asperiores enim.

Exercitationem sint eius commodi ut vitae et. Minus sunt excepturi aperiam a. Excepturi odio omnis ipsa et. Eius error doloremque facere.

 

Est et sunt magni repudiandae aut veritatis debitis et. Qui sequi modi velit ipsa eligendi voluptatem nihil. Explicabo mollitia nulla possimus dolores atque impedit perspiciatis. Voluptatem autem voluptatem illum iste. Est et et delectus laboriosam iusto ea aut corporis.

Voluptas dolorum ex est voluptatibus aut rem. Sint optio molestias praesentium maxime incidunt tempora. Vitae aut deserunt voluptatem earum. Quae fugit ipsa voluptate neque. Hic vel eos est nam aperiam reiciendis veniam. Tempore autem voluptates consectetur eum non sapiente voluptatem. Voluptatibus ratione et quisquam sit in aut laudantium. Dolorum aut in numquam ut sunt sequi et.

Numquam totam dolore assumenda rem. Rerum nemo voluptatem voluptas eos. Illo optio nihil odit magnam id tenetur sequi rerum. Consequatur et facere architecto inventore non consequatur dignissimos consequatur. Iste vitae qui quos laudantium porro et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”