What do you hate to see on a Resume?
As the title says, when screening resumes, what do you guys hate the most? What makes you automatically drop it in the "shit" pile?
As the title says, when screening resumes, what do you guys hate the most? What makes you automatically drop it in the "shit" pile?
Career Resources
A non-target school
lol, so very mean.
my pet peeve is exaggerations of any sort. if you claim to be able to speak spanish, i'll find a spanish speaker to test you out.
Ditto!
1-Typos/errors/ poor grammar, etc. No excuses, even if English is a second language to you. Get a proof-reader!
2- Skills-If you took a module about something in a class once during your sophomore year, it is NOT a skill. If nobody has paid you to do it in real life, it is NOT a skill. Take that crap off.
3-Objectives, which are about as worthless as a LinkedIn recommendation.
If I may suggest. It would be more productive and insightful to ask what people like to see on a resume.
Gonna play the contrarian card here for all the non-target hating shitbags (even though this loser is a troll):
You know what really fucking pisses me off?
When I see a resume from someone who went to HYPS, has high grades, worked at all the best firms and is looking for a job.
Why does that piss me off?
Because if that person were as good as they represent themselves to be on their resume, they wouldn't be cold applying for jobs. On the buy side (which is the only area of finance that matters), you don't let people go who are good. That's right, IF THEY WERE THAT GOOD, THEY WOULD NEVER BE LOOKING FOR A JOB. Because people would throw dollars at them if they were that good. And other people who know what's what would be trying to recruit them left and right. And people they worked for would connect them to other buy siders. Because there aren't very many good people on the buy side, and once you are in, YOU ARE IN. Unless you fuck it up.
So when I see a resume of someone with a 3.9 from HYPS who worked at Goldman and then went on to a mega fund, and they are looking for a job, I know they are either lying or that they burn bridges and have a shitty personality. Don't even think about trying to bring that shit into my house.
school typically doesn't matter because you evaluate candidates within their school's resume book
auto-dings typically are: 1. no/very low GPA (GPA down. I typically assume GPA
red flags are: 1. if your main skills are CapIQ and Bloomberg, and all your clubs are in finance and you have completed 3 case studies and 5 training the street courses, and you go to a place like Stern, it makes you seem like a finance robot. make sure your interests are outside finance to make you seem more well-rounded if this might be an issue. if your only interests are basketball and reading the wsj, that's a ding in my book (thought might be different for others)
An objective
I'm still in college, but I see MANY "acquaintances" that have 2 page long resumes with terrible formatting.
Some of the atrocities I've seen:
A bulleted list of the classes they took and what they learned in those classes. An objective Not listing major GPA when its higher than overall Awful awful bullet points
^ yea no clover leaves as bullet points to make them 'stand out'
What are clover leaves?
1) "Young Democrats" 2) No GPA/SAT listed 3) Weird format 4) Any typos 5) Obvious exaggeration (e.g. generated 500% returns; completed something with "terrifying" efficiency)
I don't agree with firefighter entirely. For me at least, there can never be "too much" finance on your resume. If your resume is drowning in finance, assuming your stats (GPA/SAT) are up to par, you will get an interview. On the interview, I will decide whether or not you are socially retarded.
For the record, my favorite type of candidate is a non-target with "Ivy caliber" stats/internships, without a chip on his/her shoulder. So don't lose sleep over going to a non-target.
I wish the same can be said for UK. I'm in a UK non-target school with African IB experience and I keep getting bad feedback that my school is an auto_dinge irrespective of experience.
1) An objective 2) Misspellings 3) MMA or Ultimate Fighting under interests
I'm curious why you consider that an auto-ding?
Really curious about this as well. I actually have kickboxing under my interests because I go train regularly. Should I be taking that off?
do people actually care about SAT scores?
whenever i'm applying for something and it asks me to list SAT scores, i typically llist N/A. first off, i don't even remember them, second off, there's huge evidence that they're correlated to your family's income and not even a fair test of intelligence. so far i've had great luck with interviews so i'm wondering if it's even a an issue...
smart people tend to get rich and have the genetics to sire smart kids who have the advantages of wealth. c'est la vie.
ok flame away socialists. i am ready for you.
using the title of summer analyst when it should say summer intern (i.e. freshman pwm) - it makes you look like a prestige whore. but, of course, when one actually has/had an SA job, it is acceptable to use that coveted title on the resume
I prefer the term "Auto-ding" pile
I received a resume once that came in a .xls file...
Lol
Well, Microsoft Word's formatting can be pretty awkward...did he at least have the courtesy to send it with the gridlines off?
I hate to see resumes where somebody has put in no effort whatsoever professionally. I have seen way too many resume's where the school, grades, and formatting are good...then they have one "internship" as a life guard or on a golf course.
Some proportion of students clearly go through college thinking, "If I get good grades, I'll "get into" a great job!" No, academics will not carry you, especially when they are unrelated to banking. Just show me something that proves your interest in finance did not blossom in senior year with graduation looming.
Still had the gridlines... it was about as ugly as you could imagine.
Agreeing with everyone who has said "objective." So pointless. Also, "Microsoft Office" as a skill.
i don't like seeing ms paint as a skill
I am not an "interests' fan at all unless it has some detail. Not saying a ding but they definitely make me roll my eyes. The next kid who lists photography and/or travel will be the 1,000,000th.
If you put an interest, put something specific. I.e/e.g.. if you're going to list photography, tell me that you won the ansel adams golden camera award or something. I will still think it is lame but at least you've demonstrated it in a way beyond typing the word. Running (2011 New York Marathon last place/kicked in the face by a kenyan), etc.
Objective is damn near auto ding.
bad resume format such as one with a lot of empty spaces, and obvious typos
spelling errors, bad formatting
also essays on each position held... especially when those positions are internships
An objective or a laundry list of college courses taken....that aside, I have had some pretty shitty resumes sent to me recently by applicants who networked for the job and we offered them roles so I think it is more about who you know
if someone has a gay name
names like: Stacy, Kelly, Rebecca.. you know, any female names.
Turn-offs for me, not necessarily auto dings:
1) Two page resumes 2) Any grammar mistakes of typos (Resumes should be perfect. No excuses) 3) No GPA (Clearly a sign of [email protected])
I could go on for a while
weird font, colors, increased margins, too much information, no bullet points / no bolding, I honestly spend 1 minute or less scanning a resume
most important thing to me is one or two lines below your contact info talking directly to ME why you are the perfect candidate for the specific position
No objective for IB roles or in general? I have an objective on my CV because my work experience is in restaurant management. So many job fair/ HR recruiters I speak with say, "You know this is a finance role right?"...SMH. In my head I think;" You do see the 3.8 GPA and the Finance MBA in bold right?"
Undergad in Business Admin.; MBA in Finance yet I've had 4+ recruiters ask me about how many hours of accounting I've had so I list the relevant courses. wrong or right?
Then most of my friends on Wall St. say they can't automatically see how an operations/ restaurant management background correlates to success in an entry-level finance role and that an objective helps to sell this. I've also heard I should just take it off.
I always send a letter of recommendation from a a guy I worked with on a corporate development project in grad school b/c he was the CEO of the firm and he worked for 20 years or so in M&A at a bulge bracket. I'm trying to lend some credibility to what ,if I'm honestly speaking, is seen by most HR reps as a resume of a guy from a non-target with no industry work experience and no internships. All responses are welcome. Thanks in advance.
The way I see it, an objective basically states "I want a job in finance". No shit; that's why I sent in my resume to this position. If I wanted to go into tech or ops or something I wouldn't be applying for IB/S&T/whatever it is position, right? I just find objectives redundant.
Thinking back to my college years, I definitely made the mistake of leaving off my GPA, making a laundry list of specific classes, and talking about coming in 1st place in a stock picking competition (these were alll listed by prior posters). To each his own.
Honestly, we don't hire with resumes. I don't hire anyone I don't already know and trust. If I don't know the person they'd better come from a damn good referral source. It's difficult for me to comprehend that people hire off of resumes and then based off interviews.
if someone put porn down as an interest i think they should be an auto hire
Officia assumenda esse cupiditate et quia amet voluptas. Fugiat quasi voluptates suscipit aut molestias cum. Dignissimos modi voluptatibus esse quis et. Quaerat vero quod voluptatem placeat excepturi ut sed aliquid. Ex natus voluptatem sit ex. Velit tenetur qui esse maxime qui.
Qui distinctio qui molestiae autem natus architecto quo. Soluta quia in non consectetur dolores qui. Sint dolorum ratione deserunt asperiores debitis ut.
Officia nisi architecto praesentium nobis qui labore. Rerum et ipsa illo laboriosam et voluptatem et. Dolorum laboriosam iste aut consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Atque dolor aut beatae fugiat voluptas possimus. Labore odio aut consequatur dolore id deleniti. Sint esse dicta nulla qui consequatur.
Voluptatum corrupti facere laborum minus. Libero porro vero laborum quo. Et doloribus doloribus cupiditate iste debitis similique delectus. Autem pariatur soluta rerum error eos aut.