Where do the post-MBA PE associates end up eventually?

After the IB -> PE -> -> B-School -> PE path, most post-MBA associates do not make it to the VP. So, where do the post-MBA PE associates end up eventually? Does anyone have the estimates in terms of the percentage breakdown?

 

I have no data to back it up, but I'd estimate that most post-MBA PE associates make it to VP. I'm not saying your comment is wrong, but do you have a source?

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

From what I have seen, most post-mba PE associates do become VPs. If they are not internally promoted, they will look at other firms. Someone who has done the education/career path you indicated is most likely dedicated to a career in PE.

 
NYKnicks92:

On a side more, what's the point of doing B-school after PE if the plan is only to return to PE. I know it's because firms boot you after 2 years, but WHY do they do that?

It seems that most firms have more pre-MBA associates than post-MBA - basically a thinning out of the herd. You do see occasionally people leave a PE firm, get an MBA and then return the same firm, but I think that is somewhat rare. The 2 or 3 and out system reduces the funds' risk when hiring someone straight out of a banking or consulting program.

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 
Best Response

I don't have first-hand insight because I'm not on the buy-side yet, but my guess is that for the post-MBA role:

a) The fund wants someone who is credentialed. The elite MBA provides that credential, which means during fundraising cycles, investors know that they're entrusting billions of dollars to a team of HBS, GSB, and Wharton guys.

That credential also means something (for good or not) to portfolio companies; when you're putting someone as young as 27, 28 on the board of a company you've acquired and in a role that the company's C-suite needs to report to, you want them to believe that guy has some legitimacy. The MBA provides that, at least nominally; in some cases it actually works against you (guys who rose through the ranks at blue-collar manufacturing firms by the sweat of their brow getting irked by the 'high and mighty' attitude of the guy from HBS).

b) The fund also wants someone who has a healthy and expansive network. An elite MBA also provides this; if you graduate from HBS, your section alone gives you 90 other people with whom you share an extraordinarily close bond. In addition, you have access to the entire HBS network. All around the globe, HBS loves to take care of its own. Same goes for the GSB, except there the graduating classes are so much smaller than HBS' that the entire class is fairly intimate.

This bears dividends during fundraising (it's easier to get money from the IBM retirement fund, CALPERS, the NYS teachers' pension, or Blackstone's FoF arm when you know someone working there), in deal-sourcing (a guy in VC who invested in a startup three years ago in the seed stage calls his classmate who works at a MF to let him know that startup would be a perfect bolt-on for one of the PE fund's portfolio companies), and in numerous other scenarios I'm getting too lazy to type out in detail.

c) The fund wants to make sure it has someone who's in it for the long haul. If you are willing to endure an opportunity cost >$500,000 in terms of foregone earnings and tuition expenses for a chance to return to your firm or another in the PE industry, you're certainly making a fairly lasting commitment.

d) The fund wants the best of the best. As mentioned before, the ratio of post-MBA associates to VPs is pretty skewed. You have to cull the herd somehow, and if you can do that by putting all the would-be-VPs through a screening process as tortuous and challenging as the MBA admission cycle while gaining all the benefits (a, b, c) mentioned above, you've got a win-win.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
HedgeKing:

Granted that number includes both pre-MBA and post-MBA, I would think the post-MBA associate to VP ratio is still pretty high.

You are making too large of a leap here.

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 

Three reasons: lack of space at the VP level; pre-MBA associates want to get top MBA and PE helps you get there; having a seasoned PE associate return with a top MBA is more meaningful and PE firms can continue with this model cuz they CAN - given the adverse nature of the selection process and "supply" of smart ppl that want to do PE.

 

How do other firms view someone like this? Do they view them as damaged goods?.... why would they be good enough for my firm if they aren't good enough for the one they came from is the mentality I would be worried about.

 
Eric Stratton:

Is it possible to move to another firm? Of course. Is it easy to find partner-track Sr. Associate / VP roles? Not necessarily. But there are plenty of other options: portfolio company finance, M&A or ops role, corp dev or corp fin role at a public company, hedge fund, back to investment banking, etc.

Great advice and comments, thanks!

Want to Lose the body fat, keep the muscles, I can help.
 

Dolore qui quae enim ipsa delectus iusto facere. Commodi dolores voluptatem odio debitis reiciendis sunt. Quasi qui eligendi iste numquam nobis quisquam. Officia expedita fuga et corrupti id. Adipisci est dolore consectetur perferendis officiis minima.

Eligendi id vitae provident accusamus rerum deleniti dolorum distinctio. Ut officia dolor nobis aut illum. Velit eveniet sit iste. Tempora in tempora aut voluptas inventore.

Necessitatibus culpa aperiam perferendis aliquid atque alias. Dolores perspiciatis iste reprehenderit sunt officiis et. Officiis distinctio quisquam et impedit ut.

Voluptatem ipsa quis ut quibusdam velit. Earum dolor sunt magni amet quis amet est quibusdam. Maxime exercitationem quasi et neque. Sunt facilis quia in delectus. Quia nam officiis sint earum atque est saepe.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”