which offer would you guys take
Lincoln International vs Citi vs Guggenheim vs UBS vs PWP vs Moelis-all are in NYC except Moelis which is in london
Lincoln International vs Citi vs Guggenheim vs UBS vs PWP vs Moelis-all are in NYC except Moelis which is in london
+145 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 33 | 13h | |
+75 | Best IB group on the Street | 36 | 6h | |
+68 | Thoughts and tips on how to speak like an investment banker. | 25 | 1d | |
+58 | BIG FOUR ARE PARADISE | 15 | 1d | |
+49 | Tell me one good reason why Jefferies isn’t going to be a top bank in the next 5 years | 23 | 1d | |
+39 | UBS Outlook | 28 | 2d | |
+36 | How to deal with egotistical team? | 6 | 4d | |
+28 | Got RBC offer but I have cold feet accepting. | 34 | 1d | |
+26 | Very ridiculous interview feedback | 13 | 23h | |
+26 | Why Is It Called Investment Banking? | 8 | 18h |
Career Resources
all for SA and IBD
Citi or UBS probably
If you want IB long term then I would take PWP, but otherwise Citi if you are just thinking of doing a 2 year program.
Have no clue what Moelis is like in London but if I were to choose I would go with Citi especially if you have a top group there.
Guggenheim PWP Citi UBS Lincoln Moelis (only because Murica!)
Guggenheim over PWP and Citi? Come on now.
Perella
Perella
I'd say PWP as well, unless you want the impress your friends who are not following finance - then I'd say just go with Citi.
Citi PWP UBS
Would take Moelis over the latter two, but... Not a fan of London..
I second this. PWP is up-and-coming and a strong shop but not an elite boutique in the sense that they're top 15 in league tables and able to place well into the buyside. UBS is improving but still risky.
Plus, if you can get an offer from Citi (as I know they have a very high SA->FT conversion rate), you can leverage that to even better places (if that's what you want to do). I know people who have done Citi SA then gotten offers from Evercore, MS, GS, and etc.
Haven't worked at either bank, but:
Citi is a weak BB that's been in decline for the last few years. It has no advantage over PWP, whether you're talking compensation, buy-side exits (they've got former analysts currently at New Mountain, Fortress, Leonard Green...) corporate culture, whatever. And if you want to leverage your offer, PWP has the superior brand.
PWP
CONGRADS on all the offers!
People who are saying Citi are trolls. Take PWP>
PWP for sure -- their analysts do half restructuring and half M&A -- sets up well for the buy-side
I would say PWP > Citi > rest. The Perella kids I know turned down offers from JPM/MS and get to work on a lot of interesting projects while they're there. PWP also pays much higher than Citi. Also, Citi analysts haven't been doing phenomenally with buyside placement over the last couple cycles - even in the top groups.
Quod quam aperiam ut. Temporibus sapiente deleniti doloremque ullam. Et excepturi voluptatum sequi sint.
Numquam soluta repellendus et quo quidem tempore velit. Inventore iure error delectus amet dolor alias explicabo. Facilis aut repellendus mollitia beatae fugiat. Harum iusto enim quas illum voluptatem. Fugit nostrum sunt dolorum amet sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...