Who's the most entrepreneurial of high finance?
Kind of curious if you'd consider those who are in IBD to be entrepreneurial in nature? If not who do you think probably shows the most aptitude or desire to be entrepreneurial.
Hedge Funds? Sales/Trading? Consulting?
Curious your guys' take.
And no, venture capital doesn't count in this discussion.
I'd think that the most obvious and accurate answer is sales? Then again, sales encompasses many roles, including the senior levels of IB (VP, MD), as well as those in traditional sales (S&T).
The people who are actually entrepreneurs.
No, that does no include IB personnel unless they have broken off and formed their own boutique.
Entrepreneurs - bet everything, stand to lose it all.
Investment bankers - always get their base, only stand to lose a bonus and/or employment.
Investment bankers are not entrepreneurs. But they do have a better Sharpe ratio.
PWM hands down. no base, if you don't produce, you're fired. don't produce a lot? pay gets cut.
in addition to that, I'd say starting a fund (HF, AM, PE) is pretty entrepreneurial.
IBD are the least entrepreneurial unless they went into it already having that type of mindset. Banking is like a polar opposite to entrepreneurship in every sense of the word.
The hipster looking dude who starts his own pretentious cupcake shop, and sees the business flourish due to location, and demand. Then decides to open another one, and in 10 years is worth 20 million.
This man usually doesn't work in finance; and most of these "dudes" fail.
Finance is, was and will always be a support function.
I believe the main reason people do not like their work is because you are supporting someone else. Whether that be in allocating capital, in advising on deals. You are and will be someone's bitch.
The only way to be "entrepreneurial" is to be an entrepreneur or aim for a CEO position in a company that actually does things instead of again, being somebody's bitch.
PWM, or actual entrepreneurs like Mike Bloomberg who worked in finance and then started their own business later
true entrepreneurship involves starting a business whose revenue is NOT based on the founder's hourly labor. even if an investment banker DOES break off on his own, i wouldn't describe him as a model entrepreneur if he charges clients a fee based on his advisory work. which is what most self-employed investment bankers do.
but if an i-banker breaks off on his own and becomes a raging success to the extent that he owns a truly self-sustaining company that doesn't require him to be there, THEN i would say he's a true entrepreneur. see Roger Altman and Evercore. Roger Altman broke off to found Evercore, which is now publicly traded and has 1000 employees. he is no longer the CEO of Evercore.
Investment Bankers are not entrepreneurial.
Most entrepreneurial and innovative division? (Originally Posted: 05/20/2011)
What division do you think requires the most entrepreneurial and innovative thinking?
the startyourownbusiness one
Haha, if entrepreneurship is your thing, you don't belong in banking.
Checklist from Morgan Stanley.
"Is Investment Banking Right for You? A checklist to help you decide if you have the skills and temperament for this area
You have strong analytical and numerical skills that put you at ease with financial data. You are driven to achieve results and will push yourself to perform well under pressure and against tight deadlines. You are a committed team player with the ability to manage a wide range of responsibilities. You can articulate complex ideas simply and summarise them effectively in your speaking and writing. You are committed to excellence in your work and maintain high professional and ethical standards. You thrive in an environment that encourages innovation and entrepreneurial thinking."
In corporate speak "entrepreneurial" actually means "in the event that someone above you forgets to micro-manage you, you'll still be able to get work done on your own."
Look, I'm from the midwest, I'm as gullible as it gets they used "entrepreneurial" all the time- I don't think I was under the illusion that a lot of innovation goes on at banks when I came out here. If you want innovation and entrepreneurship, work for a start-up.
Edit: 2nd Aggravate.
^ Agreed, real entrepreneurial stuff is breaking the status quo, and challenging the norm, often linked in with being rebellious and breaking rules. I got dinged for being too entrepreneurial.
Most entrepreneurial work places? (Originally Posted: 10/18/2011)
I have a very entrepreneurial background + 2 years of blue chip experience. I graduate with a bachelors in December, and am interested in hearing opinions on the most entrepreneurial companies to work for. I have definitely been considering start-ups, so please don't just answer "join a startup." I am looking at larger, solid companies such as Google that welcome people with entrepreneurial backgrounds and have an entrepreneurial culture. Any ideas?
Prop firms.
Google.
Techstars
Try some VC firms. As far as I understand, a VC firm funds a company starting up, and I think they also fancy entrepreneurs. This would be better seconded by someone else though.
Correct, VC funds give advantages to people with entrepreneurial background, and most of their activities consist of entrepreneur-like jobs. Look into some of those.
What would be the best job for somebody with an entrepreneurial spirit? (Originally Posted: 10/28/2011)
I was just wondering what you guys would think would be the best job to have for somebody that's interested in starting their own business on the side/eventually, but has to have steady income at the moment.
It seems like a job with not many hours would be ideal, but it also seems like consulting or vc would be great too. Not sure about IB since I've read that IB isn't as tailored to running a business as it is to running finance.
Consulting seems advantageous TO ME because you learn the inner workings of some businesses, but vc seems like it would be advantageous also because of pretty much the same reason + you have people pitch stuff to you that can get your brain working/inspired.
This is based off of my very limited knowledge about what these types of employees actually deal with.
So... what do you guys think?
SALES
I concur.
It depends on your timeline of when you'd like to start a new company...if it's relatively soon (say 3-5 years), maybe consulting would be a good spot. If you have 10-15 years, then working at a large corporation (e.g. IBM, P&G) would be beneficial as several of these companies allow you to move around from group to group every 2-3 years. This increases your exposure to various aspects of the organization, which, if you pick them properly will help you tailor the skillsets you want for starting a company.
Sales... your business wont be a business unless you can get the people to buy whatever your company sells
Sales or Business Development
Strategy or Development
This.
When you're involved in either of these functions with a company, you'll be forced to learn about creating competitive edges, learning the competition and discovering new strategies going forward -- everything involved in being an entrepreneur. It's the best opportunity to see how a company functions and it will surely give you ideas about products you could start/improve yourself. You'll also develop a broad skillset -- sales included.
You could also work for a start up where you'll pretty much be forced to do the above if you are competent and can bring decent ideas to the table. Again, this will allow you to get experience talking with current clients, prospects, industry leaders and give you ideas about products you could start/improve. But, working at a start up/developing firm can have some significant risks, too.
I'm in a similar boat; I have offers from a top tier mutual fund in asset management and also a BB investment banking offer...I'm thinking IB because it is in New York and there's a better "network"
Scott- Give us a little more details about your background so we can get into more specifics. I kind of like the Sales comments because that is truly a job that builds character. If you can get rejected a million times, and keep moving forward, there is nothing that will stop you in entrepreneurship. For someone in college, who is not sure what to major in, but knows for sure they want to either start a business, or have side businesses, I think a CS major isn't a bad bet. Lets face it - the internet is a great, low risk place to be launching businesses. Having CS skills can give you an advantage in building products/services that can be marketed over the internet. CS majors can also command pretty good salaries. Note that some CS programs are really math intensive so those might not be as helpful.
Me personally - I chose to do accounting. I figured I would have a low risk steady job during the day, which would give me plenty of time on my side businesses and allow me to be much more riskier in these ventures. My accounting career is not at all closely related to my entrepreneurial ventures online. And your career doesn't have to be either.
I don't really have much of a background to speak of really... I started a very small lawn care business this year. Just starting out in college again, thinking about majoring in CS. I'm pretty positive that I'd like to major in something with a lot of math since good math skills can be very valuable... CS seems interesting to me and I love some of the programs that are out there. It seems like a great fit for me and what I'm interested in (looove technology)... I just hope I can cut it.
I was really looking moreso for a comparison of consulting and vc with other suggestions... but I can't see myself busting my ass for a CS degree and then going into sales and not using my math knowledge... besides, I'm not that great of a salesman unless it's something I truly believe in. I can't muster up that fake/cheesy used car salesman attitude and try to sell crap to people.
This really depends on your skillset and the type of company you want to build. If you are looking to build some sort of technology start-up, then having a background in CS is obviously beneficial. Of course, if you are building your technological skills, you will want to anticipate what types of products will need to be invented 3-5 years from now, and then build those skills. Every hot start-up today is looking for python or javascript developers, but honestly, how many more social-based start-ups can really turn a profit. The real, large-scale value opportunities lie in technologies which are 3-5 years out. These include new interfaces (multiple touch screens, Siri-like audio interfaces, etc), data intelligence, and building systems which incorporate "things" (ie attaching your oven to the internet and building the software to turn it on with your mobile phone).
Outside of tech, it really depends on the type of business you are building. Take a look at Drucker, the famous management expert. He claims businesses need to do only two things: innovation, and marketing. Therefore, you need to build a business which innovates, in which case you need the skills and experience in that area of innovation (like technology, or even biology, or physics, etc). Or, you need to build marketing skills, which essentially means sales skills. You did this running a lawncare business. The service you are selling is relatively commoditized; your ability to attract customers came down to effective marketing. If you don't have the desire to start a business which innovates, then your best bet is to start a business where a sales/marketing background would be useful.
hmmm... thanks for the response. See, EE/CE seem like they would be great things to learn also (both for business and just being able to build really cool things)... well really, any engineering does, but as for tech...
Really sucks that it would take way too long to learn physics, ce, ee, cs, and me
Life's too short :(
If you guys were a computer scientist and you were offered two jobs, all else equal (or at least close), one in VC in your intended field and the other a corporate job also in your intended field, which would you pick if you were in this position?... It seems like a really really hard decision haha
Personally, I would choose the corporate job, and then consider transferring to a start-up after I had a decent amount of money to live off.
Your actually describing my job here...BIG4 Restructuring.
I work about 40-50 hours a week (50 at most) and a major part of my job involves essentially running various business's and developing strategies for them.
Of course a lot of it is selling off assets and liquidating companies but you still get a knowledge of how the business operate and what it takes to run them.
Thats the job you describe (although Im in Europe and restructuring can vary a lot depending on local law).
prostitution
Sales, biz dev/biz strat, or strat/management consulting all seem like good foundations. You'd probably want to look at some CF positions because the hours won't be as killer and will enable you to have time to learn outside of work as well.
i hate to pimp for my old job, but strat consulting. if nothing else you get to see the retarded shit that goes on in real businesses and you have some great inverse examples to learn from. and you get insight into markets that you never knew existed.
Startups or Prop trading.
Hmmm... what type of degree is needed to get into strategy or development?
Can anybody explain why strategy/sales/development/some consulting is better than VC? Are VCs not as involved in the actual expansion of their portfolio companies?
In addition to funding, VCs provide advice and connections to big players in the field. You may not be able to participate in the high level discussions that take place between these experts and management of the funded companies. This may make you miss out on key elements of running a business.
Additionally, VCs are extremely hard to get into from undergrad -- especially good ones that are worth their salt. Trust me, there are a lot of "venture capital" firms who have no understanding of their supported companies and are very good at selling the "need" for additional funding, essentially keeping dying companies alive for longer than they should be.
When you are participating in a start up company, you get experience working with c execs, listening to how they strategize new moves in a market segment, see how they think when selling and promoting the product and get to watch how everything functions, from the people in the back office to the CEO who comes in every other week.
A lot of that insight in crucial when trying to do things on your own. You see what works and what doesn't work, and it may give you a headstart on a new product as you already know much about the current market and its competitors. Additionally, it'll give you an idea of whether or not you are passionate about your market space. If you don't have passion for fulfilling a need, you'll never get anywhere as an entrepreneur.
Working for a particular company in strategy/development would lend a similar experience to the above described.
As for what major, I'd go for what you're passionate about. I'd also stay away from the hard sciences if you're not interested in them and don't want to pursue finance/econ/business as well. If you end up with strictly a hard science major and want to work for a ground breaking firm in that particular field, it'll be hard to convince them out of undergrad that you're really capable of being in strategy and development and not in basic lab-rat type stuff that comes with most hard science majors. I guess what I'm trying to say is, pick something you're passionate about and be able to demonstrate that passion in an interview, and major (as long as it's business-y or quantatitive) shouldn't be a problem.
Ah... so VCs mostly find the people to run the businesses and the people in the VC firm don't really make the decisions?
I like how this discussion has gotten me thinking about a job at one of the Big 4s... again haha. Is strategy consulting just as hard to get into at MBB as the other types of consulting?
I don't want to speak too much for those in VC. What I wrote above is about the limited knowledge I have about VC firms/my experience with the firms.
Don't know too much about Big 4s consulting either. MBP may be able to speak more to that.
I should emphasize that most of the people I know who have started firms or new products usually have years and years of experience in a particular field. The true outlier are the Mark Zuckerbergs of the world who manage to create a billion+ firm at 22.
If I wanted a job and had the entrepreneurial spirit, I'd probably try and become an entrepreneur
I was waiting for that comment lol... I'm talking about somebody who needs some steady income for a little bit at least
Currently doing a minor in marketing whilst majoring in finance. Although a lot of people will say it is useless for banking I think it's good to have the knowledge if you want to one day start your on business. I've learned a lot on negotiation and (marketing) strategies. Marketing however, is a lot of bs and it's not going to help you going into finance/IB.
I think strat cons is a great entry point because you'll get to know a lot of sectors and see various types of business management styles. Then again, I think strat consulting is one of the most interesting career paths if you want to do business. Just my thoughts.
As said, totally depends on what kind of business and the timeline you have in place. I see a lot of sales backgrounds among business owners. I would say the two most important factors for starting out would be 1. Build personal savings. 2. Be flexible, able to pick up and move,take risks.
Of course careers in finance, sales etc, will build experience and create connections, but before you realize it you may have assumed too much responsibility and then pursuing entrepreneurship isn't worth your personal risk. But having access to cash is important.
I went in and out of University debating this choice.
Entrepreneurial Types In Private Equity (Originally Posted: 08/16/2015)
One of the Managing Partners at the fund I work for (really the guy who makes 100% of the decisions) never went to college and has a very successful background as a serial entrepreneur. The other partners also have entrepreneurial and/or sales backgrounds. As a result, our financial models are very simple and I'm not really sure if I'm acquiring the same skill set that I would be at most other funds. I'm just wondering, if this is a 1 in 10,000 type of fund, or if there are other PE funds out there that don't really give a shit about financial modeling?
Btw, for those of you that are curious. Our returns are fucking awesome and we have no problem raising money from institutional investors. That being said, we do focus on middle market deals, so I'm not too sure if these kinds of backgrounds would work for a multi-billion $$$ fund.
Sed voluptatem aliquid in et voluptate. Fuga aut ut voluptas ea nam et sapiente. Sed praesentium necessitatibus voluptatem delectus unde beatae sapiente.
Voluptas deleniti minus hic animi consectetur nulla exercitationem. Qui cupiditate temporibus veritatis animi et. Dolores voluptatem ut in voluptates iure minima ex et.
Nobis dolores sed quos corporis cum fugiat sed. Repellendus necessitatibus asperiores qui delectus esse. Eos temporibus similique et maxime. Et sed repudiandae omnis fuga soluta non. Ut aut exercitationem numquam nobis velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et itaque doloremque tempora dolorem inventore. Porro doloremque laborum numquam.
Voluptate voluptates consequatur dolorem nostrum omnis aut quibusdam. Cum nisi quia iste esse. Sit voluptatem laudantium enim eveniet dolor. Unde consequuntur et unde alias facilis accusamus. Aut fugiat esse doloribus omnis perspiciatis est libero.
Minima ut eveniet delectus. Consectetur explicabo molestiae laboriosam quas facere in. Et odit sed reprehenderit architecto eum a quibusdam. Aut rerum ipsa porro.
At qui dolores autem eos. Aperiam repellat omnis ad dicta ipsam voluptate saepe autem. Ullam qui ipsum quia officia aut voluptatem. Eos voluptatum et molestias voluptatem. Enim exercitationem sed dolorum maxime adipisci quia rerum.
Dolorem sit distinctio nihil rerum est explicabo molestiae. Veniam minima et corrupti eum. Nisi ab omnis consectetur.
Quia adipisci quis et quod id quaerat. Quasi est et consequuntur unde aut eos sapiente. Quidem et sint et minima ea nulla quae. Ea sint quae tempora eum.
Recusandae est adipisci voluptas eligendi nemo quaerat ducimus. Assumenda et accusantium ut. Suscipit autem qui in quis at nihil. Est minus quidem corporis quos.