Settling DCM/ECM once and for all

DCM/ECM in IBD is banking. It is IPOs and Debt underwriting, opposed to advisory (M&A, Lev Fin...). If you prospectives have had the chance to read Monkey Business, the guys are DCM, they issue and underwite bonds.

Now, banks have equities and fixed income S&T groups. For the fixed income they will have bond, credit, derivatives... sales people and traders; same w/ equities.

Pure DCM/ECM, not in IBD, is jack-you-off middle office. They are not traders, not bankers, and not sales -shitheads, is what they are. They are obnoxious fucks. It is middle office and there role is not really known. They occasionaly blurt out bullshit statements, but i dont even know what the fuck they do. They go between bankers, traders, and sales and rile everybody up w/ their bullshit.

 

My thoughts from the postings by Dan, Zala and all (1) Yes, ECM/DCM is considered front office, investment banking (2) But cos' of the role it plays in a capital raising transaction, the work done and skills picked up by a ECM/DCM analyst does not seem as challenging/intellectually stimulating as those done by M&A analysts. (3) Hence, zala feels that a ECM/DCM role is no different from a middle office role.

 

to make it simpler, surely you've heard of industry and product groups. Believe it or not, M&A is not the only product group. You can well and truly be a full-blooded investment banker if you're working in a product group, be it M&A, ECM or DCM. These are, generally speaking, the "products" that the "industry" groups are pitching to their clients.

 

"(2) But cos' of the role it plays in a capital raising transaction, the work done and skills picked up by a ECM/DCM analyst does not seem as challenging/intellectually stimulating as those done by M&A analysts."

Given that structured debt is often within DCM, i don't think that you can say that M&A is more challenging/stimulating than DCM.

 
Best Response

zala you're an obnoxious little boy. you should shut up before you make a fool of yourself here. i can't believe that someone who hasn't even got a bonus yet can post as if he's an authority on banking.

DCM/ECM falls under different divisions at different banks. even at DB, ECM is under global banking and DCM under global markets. however the main thing to note is that these product groups straddle both sides of the wall. generally you'll be doing less modelling skills in these groups and more presentation and comps analysis.

Anyway, from the looks of it, JPMorgan's ECM/DCM teams fall under their IBD in Asiapac region anyway. http://asiagrad.jpmorgan.com/content/content_9.htm

 

Most product groups fall under DCM. At my bank, lev fin is DCM, and so is Asset Backed Finance, Structured Finance, Derivatives, New Products, Distressed Finance, Structured Credit Products, Liability Mgmt, Project Finance, and many others. I'd hardly say these are middle-office, or that they require fewer skills. In fact, some of the smartest people on Wall St are in these groups, including a lot of finance and math Phd's, and they are enormously profitable. The work is also often far more substantive than in IBD, at least for analysts and associates.

 

ECM and DCM straddle the markets/IBD divide at various banks so can feature in either/both pools (and can be part of the same group in some institutions). But to be 100% clear, both are FRONT OFFICE roles because you do deals for clients. There are many similarities between the two and a few important differences...

The skills (sales, product knowledge, understanding investor sentiment etc) are very similar. You are essentially the middle-man between issuers and investors, and such you spend most of your time pitching ideas to issuers. You originate deals and bring them to the market. When this happens, the syndicate desk manages the sale (i.e. investor allocations) and decides on the price. This process doesn't change whether you're talking debt or equity.

ECM tends to fit within IBD more because it involves company valuations. Therefore, there's a lot of modelling (Discounted Cashflow models, comp analysis) involved that means it's very similar to M&A. It doesn't matter much if you're valuing a business for the purpose of selling it to another company or floating it on the stock market.

The modelling involved in DCM is much less onerous as pricing is connected to deals that are already in the market. Therefore, you don't need the company valuation skills. DCM is a business involving much higher turnover - any one individual might work on several deals every month. In fact, deal execution is the tedious part.

Neither team is necessarily "better" than the other, but in some institutions you may get better kudos in one over the other depending on that company's reputation in each dept. Goldman being one example where ECM takes precedence, while at Citi the debt boys probably rule.

As for intellectual stimulation, it depends on your likes/dislikes. If you like modelling and long hours, go for M&A and ECM. If you like pitching and working in a more trading/mathematical environment, go for DCM.

 

Do you guys vaseline your penis' before you stroke. IT IS MIDDLE OFFICE. I think we have a bunch of DCM/ECMs trying to obfuscate. Maybe we even have a bunch of prospectives trying to fuck their peers over. DCM/ECM in the IBD group is IB. I fully understand M&A isnt the only banking theme. Have you ever heard of an IPO or junk bond offerings? Thet are done by DCM/ECM. Damn people, who are you. DCM/ECM is a group w/in IB. Now, pure DCM/ECM is, again, stroke-your-penis-middle-office. They are a go between. They don't get large bonuses like us. They didn't go elite school, they are middle office. Fuck people.

 

there is a clear distinction between the DCM/ECM IB GROUP and DCM/ECM Capital Markets people. People in DCM/ECM IBD are called investment bankers. People in DCM/ECM in capital markets, work in the "capital markets."

 

If you look on a website it will specify. For IBD they will have groups: M&A, LF, DCM/ECM, private placements.... For capital makets DCM/ECM it will be under the "capital markets" section. I can understand why so many people are confused, but it is just the way it is.

 

zala, no i am not in ECM so again if that's the first thing you assumed, i'm really sorry that you lack the ability to reason.

When people talk about DCM/ECM, they mainly refer to the group within IBD. The first thing that comes to mind is not that middle office nonsense. I'm not sure why everyone is so hung up over it?

 

First off, fuck face, zala is not me. in fact, i have never talked to fuckin zala, so fuck off there dick twit.

As for, "Dan, if you don't mind explaining it, what's the difference between capital markets ECM and IBD ECM? Don't they both raise money (equities) for companies? THX." I would be glad to explain. IBD ECM will raise capital for the firm via equity. They will do everything from ipos to equity carve outs, they are investment bankers. People who work in the "Capital Markets" equity division are a go between. They work not directly with clients, but rather through IBers. As for "snake uk," go fuck yourself douche bag. Try to see if a client would ever hire a equity capital markets fuck -they are useless. I am a banker. I work everyday. I know how my firm, as well as others is structured. Don't fuckin argue with me. Damn i feel like a fuck face. I keep repeating my self over and over. I see these people who work in the "capital markets" everyday. They are JACK-YOU-OFF-MIDDLE-FUCKING-OFFICE. Man people, just stop already.

 

Dan you are a fucking moron. Just because your bank is structured a particular way does not mean that every other bank is structured in that way. The bank at which i work has no DCM at all in the IBD (the IBD comprises only M&A and ECM) - all debt underwriting and issuance is done through the FI division.

 

Also refers to S&T, which is definitely more front office than some analyst/associate in IB locked away in the bullpen will ever be. See your clients, much?

 

"I call bullshit like its my job. I worked directly alongside a goldman DCM guy about 3 months ago. He was a banker on my syndicate. We issued some junk bonds. You guys really know how to fuck up. Don't argue with me."

I'm aware that GS in NY has DCM in the IBD - i said that where i work, we don't. Believe it or not, not all offices are structured identically.

 

you must not even work in the states then... GS IBD doesn't even have an M&A group... the only non-industry group would be LevFin. regional offices in the US at GS confer with New York/SF DCM/ECM guys on many of their transactions

i am not familiar with other international offices. and the FI division is called FICC...

 

You children are fucking shitass fucktards. I work in the industry. I have worked with DCM. I know what they do. I know how they do it. I konw who does it. Fine, so not all banks have IBD DCM. Nonetheless, most investment banks have people that issue bonds, and they are called investment bankers. The people that "work" in the capital markets are NOT investment bankers, they are capital markets assholes. There is a distinction. You ladies must be jacking off while responding to me. I work in the industry. I know the industry. I have worked with DCM IBD people. I have worked with pure capital markets people. I know what I am talking abouut. Now just SHUT THE FUCK UP.

 

These guys sure are getting worked up. They're probably shitty analysts/associates who get crapped on all the time and (trying) to take it out on the forum readers.

Typical of guys 'in the industry'. What's wrong? Bonus numbers not so hot compared to the rest of your peers?

Please. You won't last long. Congratulations on mediocrity.

 

That is a common misconception. We are, in fact, all monkeys. Dan is our equivalent of Furious George.

 

I hate fucking people disagreeing with me who have absolutley no gravitas at all. Yes, let us have an intelligent conversation, so long as you know what you are talking about. Don't fuckin jack me off and tell me things like, um, "debt issuance isnt only done in IBD." Just shut the fuck up with that bull shit. I work with these people on a daily basis. They are fucking assholes. They are not front office. They are as I have represented them.

 

Oh Dan, you foul-mouthed trader you.

Let me see if I understand this:

You, a BSD, are a front office Banka. They, are back office 'fucking assholes'.

Yet you, "work with these people on a daily basis".

Are you in syndication?

 

Dan you are the laughing stock of these forums. You have been proven wrong time and time again yet you continue spounting your crap. What a joke.

 

How have I been proven wrong, sir? Everybody here seems to agree with me, you fuck face. Everybody I ask here in the office on this lonely saturday morning, says capital markets folk are stroke-me-middle-office. Now who is the fucking joke. Two analysts, 2 associates and 1 vp seem to agree with me. Thanks you very much shitfuck, but I prefer to take their word over that of an anonymous poster. Go fuck yourself.

 

It occurs because there is one real ECM/DCM division and then there is an underwriting group in IBD that issues debt (DCM) and equity (ECM). I think we can all fucking agree that banks have divisions. They have equities, fixed-income, IBD, capital markets, operations etc. In equities you have trading desks, strategy groups et cetera. In capital markets, there are people who "work in the capital markets." They are a go-between. They go between bankers et al. and "assess the climate" of the capital markets. Now, IBD has investment bankers who DO NOT "work in the capital markets." Instead they work in IBD, hence their fucking titles. They work in IBD in a product group. They issue, manipulate, and just work with capital markets products. These products may be bonds, stocks, derivatives etc. I understand your questions, it is difficult to explain to people with no experience who want insight. The aforementioned swears do not pertain to you. They are for the fucking assholes who continue to fuck me around on this forum. They not only fuck me around, but everybody else who would like some insight into the business. They don't fucking know what the fuck they are talking about and they fuck people over. Stop the fucking bullshit.

 
dude, its an online message board. Not sure why you're so passionate/worked up about it.

Because he writes on the board to make his job seem more siginificant than the other links of the chain, to feel better about himself. Rather than proving it "on the field".

My short story is that while banks may organize departments differently, the same work needs to get done, whether you are on a coverage team or a product team or a "capital markets" team. If you are really the guy making it happen, ultimately you will rise to the top, regardless of where you started.

 

I love you Dan. You're such a straight arrow who speaks his mind. Regardless of whether you are right or not, I still love you.

So to sum it up, investment bankers who work with companies to raise cash via equities work in "ecm" in an IBD, while other ppl who just underwrite equitities (like a loan officer who files paperwork) are in "ecm" in capital markets. Am I close? Someone in NYC asked me to join their ECM division in the IBD, but being a boutique bank I'm not sure if they're me the truth.

 

Well thank you, if you are a female I love you too. If you are a guy, well, thanks again. You are partially right in your summation. People in IBD that issue equity/debt are ECM/DCM IN IBD. If they work at a bank, but are not in the investment banking division, they "work" in the capital markets. They are not front office. The loan officer example that you gave is not a good example. They usually go out of a commercial bank, and if they are in an investment bank, there functions are not similar and the repective divisions are disperate.

 

No, I'm a brother but I still want to profess my brotherly love to you. A friend of mine just got offered an ECM job in an IBD helping the senior ppl raise equity, prepare pitchbooks, and doing basic valuation stuff and keeping track of the market. That's in IBD and not cap mkt right?

Thanks Dan.

 

Read on one of the canadian IB's sites abt Debt Origination: "...expertise in bringing new issues to the dcm & advising on optimum financial structures, obtaining credit ratings, placing public & private debts"

Which area would you place it to? IBD or capmkts?

P.S. I learned a lot how to swear while was reading your posts :)

Open to all, closed to prejudice
 

At some firms, leveraged finance falls under DCM. This is the only way I could see you going straight from DCM to a buyout fund, but there may be some other obscure route that I am unfamiliar with.

DCM is pretty varied, so it depends which product you mean. ECM exit opps are nonexistent.

_______________________________________ http://www.drmarkklein.blogspot.com/
 

DCM analysts moving into Lev Fin is pretty common. It's certainly possible if you put in a year or so of good work. From Lev Fin, the exit opps are pretty solid of course, Buyout shops, Credit HFs etc.

ECM analysts should try to move into a traditional IB role ASAP. I've heard of people at CS moving from ECM into Sponsors so there again it's not unheard of. However, you're gonna have a very tough time moving onto the buyside if you stick with ECM for 2-3 years. PE firms will definitely not hire an ECM analyst and I think HFs would prefer a traditional IB analyst over an ECM analyst.

There's more modelling in DCM.

 

Suscipit ipsam et aut sint. Itaque et enim dolore non ipsa. Et vel id quasi cumque ipsum.

Sed omnis numquam vel iste nihil cumque totam. Beatae inventore sapiente pariatur consequuntur et quisquam. Non in illum officiis alias cumque architecto ratione.

Cum porro saepe voluptatem sit qui nihil. Sunt expedita omnis ea molestiae error. Inventore quisquam autem nisi non vel corporis ipsam.

 

Facere sint nulla ratione omnis illum assumenda eos. Voluptatem eius doloribus numquam sit ullam omnis perspiciatis. Recusandae assumenda ipsum itaque molestiae modi. Aut et laborum alias in. Fuga voluptate repellendus saepe quae qui voluptates quas aut.

Neque vero voluptas error tempora eum asperiores reprehenderit. Et dolorem qui consequuntur laboriosam. Quia doloremque architecto aspernatur itaque quaerat sint sint. Laborum expedita quis quo.

Autem aut sequi illum enim esse earum. Autem iste eos ratione corrupti. Est itaque dicta impedit commodi aut est ut tempora. Porro suscipit distinctio sunt excepturi. Id ipsum non cumque dolorem illo consequatur. Vel enim ipsa dicta nobis amet non alias ad. Consequatur omnis et enim ab perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”