Why use EV/EBIT multiple when compared companies in the asset intensive industry?

Hi, can anybody explain me that Why use EV/EBIT multiple when compared companies in the asset intensive industry?

I've read a interview question about this:

Question:'TheEV/EBIT,EV/EBITDA,andP/E multiples all measure a company’s
profitability. What’s the difference between them,and when do you use each one?'

Answer: P/E depends on the company’s capital structure whereas EV/EBIT and EV/EBITDA are capital structure neutral. Therefore, you use P/E for banks, financial institutions,
and other companies where interest payments/expenses are critical.

EV/EBIT includes Depreciation&Amortization whereas EV/EBITDA excludes it – you’re more likely to use EV /EBIT in industries where D&A is large and where capital expenditures and fixed assets are"important"(e.g."manufacturing), and EV/EBITDA in industries where fixed assets are"less"important"and where"D&A"is comparatively smaller(e.g."Internet"companies).

I know the difference between P/E and EV/EBIT (EV/EBITDA), but I don't know why we use EV/EBIT in asset intensive industry, rather than EV/EBITDA?

Can anyone help me with this?
Thank you very much (This question bother me for a long time)...

 

Thanks for your response, and I have further question about it. When we compared the companies in the same industry (Asset intensive industry). Every company has huge D&A at the same time, so I think this situation may makes the EBITDA multiple still useful for comparing?

THANKS

 

not that it isn't useful. Just some metrics are more useful than others. Say Company A more efficiently utilizes its asset than Company B. Assuming both are in the same industry, and EBITDA is equal, earnings in company A are more valuable because less is locked in D&A.

 

OK, I got the point here... So, you were saying that because D&A is so important in this kind of industry, so the effect from the D&A should be eliminated when we compare the companies profitability.

Is that right?

 

D&A is a proxy for capex. Ideally, you would want to do EV / EBITDA - Maintenance Capex, but most company don't break down capex between growth and maintenance so D&A is the best proxy. So if a company is able to get more out of its assets, it will be spending less in capex (and therefore D&A) and be more profitable, hence why there can be a disconnect between EV / EBITDA and EV / EBIT and why EV / EBIT is more appropriate for capital intensive firms.

 
Best Response

2 firms trade at 10x EBIT, are in the same industry and have the same EBITDA

Firm A: EBITDA: $100mm D&A / Capex: $20mm EBIT: $80mm EV: $800mm Implied EV / EBITDA: 8x

Firm B EBITDA: $100mm D&A / Capex: $40mm EBIT: $60mm EV: $600mm Implied EV / EBITDA: 6x

Firm A is more efficient with its assets (ie. it's able to generate the same EBITDA as firm B with half the annual capex spend) and therefore trade at a premium on an EV / EBITDA basis.

 

Et facilis ut dignissimos assumenda deserunt aut. Neque cum tempore asperiores facere. Laborum dolores dolore et dolor quasi et veritatis. Illo ducimus et possimus odio. Soluta nihil est id quis doloremque ipsum asperiores. Molestias mollitia natus cum qui dolores rerum ad soluta. Voluptas dolorem quidem odit dolorem iure laudantium laudantium sapiente.

Similique quisquam maxime neque. Sed itaque libero fugiat consequatur in veniam quasi. Quia voluptate aut iusto non.

Molestiae autem quos eos odio fugiat exercitationem. Corrupti fuga incidunt officia doloribus. Quia esse adipisci provident recusandae voluptates ut. Sunt blanditiis qui dolores et.

Mollitia quo sunt magnam sed. Aut impedit aliquam velit. Exercitationem quod qui provident voluptas minus est dolorem. Adipisci deleniti nisi doloribus facere expedita quidem. Quo illo cupiditate totam accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”