<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/usercontent/10356</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Look Out Walls Street, FBIs Now On The Case!</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/look-out-walls-street-fbis-now-on-the-case</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;breaking news....FBI to investigate FHLMC, FNMA, LEH and AIG for fraud - INCLUDING its executives.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/look-out-walls-street-fbis-now-on-the-case#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/33774</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/26">I-Banking Bullpen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/594">bailout</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:36:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wintonheights</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33774 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oracle of Ohmaha Sees The Future?</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/oracle-of-ohmaha-sees-the-future</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;on the bloomberg wire...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Goldman to Raise at Least $7.5 Billion From Berkshire, Public &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wow. i thot buffet only invested in companies he knew...he has that much faith in gs? whats going on here? wow&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/oracle-of-ohmaha-sees-the-future#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/33731</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/26">I-Banking Bullpen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/594">bailout</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/image/view/33732/preview" length="4915" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:10:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wintonheights</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33731 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lets Talk Wall Street Politics</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/lets-talk-wall-street-politics</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;as ive mentioned before...ive been gone awhile. did i miss the discussion for or against the presidential candidates or are we limiting that discussion on wso? im just curious to know positions and justifications from a wall street perspective, which as we all know typically sides republican, especially in a year like this one. maybe thats too much to ask tho, i know these discussions can get bitter and nasty...and no one likes to be politically exposed. any way just wondering.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/lets-talk-wall-street-politics#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/33276</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/28">Traders Train</category>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/568">politics</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:32:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wintonheights</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33276 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Fed&quot; Up With The Ambiguity of  &quot;Too Big To Fail&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/fed-up-with-the-ambiguity-of-too-big-to-fail</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;and oh so much more. I just need to vent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In capitalistic markets, the consequence of poor business decisions are losses, and for catastrophic decisions, bankruptcy. At which point does the government get to redefine the lower range of free markets after allowing its upper excesses? The implication is that markets and business are only supposed to go up in value. And the proper intervention would be to reclaim a portion of pre-disaster profits. I mean the moral hazard here is suffocating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/fed-up-with-the-ambiguity-of-too-big-to-fail&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/fed-up-with-the-ambiguity-of-too-big-to-fail#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/32841</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/28">Traders Train</category>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/276">Bail outs</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/image/view/32879/preview" length="4412" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:53:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wintonheights</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32841 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Just Curious: When you sign in to WSO do you</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/polls/just-curious-when-you-sign-in-to-wso-do-you</link>
 <description>* Head Straight For &amp;quot;Recent Posts&amp;quot; And Big Brother Watch All
* Burrow Into Specific &amp;quot;Forums&amp;quot; And Get Your Dirty Detail On
* Sit On The Fence with One Eyeball Here, One Eyeball There
</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/polls/just-curious-when-you-sign-in-to-wso-do-you#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/18911</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:12:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wintonheights</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18911 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Extra Extra Read All About It!</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/extra-extra-read-all-about-it</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Interested to know what websites people frequent for work, business, news, investing, politics, sports or entertainment - but to the point that they just cant do without it, SERIOUSLY. Besides the obvious, WSO, here are a few off the top of my head....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com&quot; title=&quot;www.economist.com&quot;&gt;www.economist.com&lt;/a&gt; (best written biz-pub period)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.espn.go.com&quot; title=&quot;www.espn.go.com&quot;&gt;www.espn.go.com&lt;/a&gt; (self explanatory)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nymag.com&quot; title=&quot;www.nymag.com&quot;&gt;www.nymag.com&lt;/a&gt; (their picks/reviews are just golden)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/extra-extra-read-all-about-it&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/extra-extra-read-all-about-it#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/13150</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/25">Public Resume Review Service</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:11:40 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wintonheights</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13150 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
