<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/usercontent/597</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Which top fund will go bust?</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/which-top-fund-will-go-bust</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Which top-tier fund do you guess will go bust in the current cycle (or at least miss hurdle)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apollo? (There was an article in barrons about how many of Apollo&#039;s investments&lt;br /&gt;
are under water (linen n things, realogy))&lt;br /&gt;
KKR? (a bunch of megadeals in last year)&lt;br /&gt;
Silverlake? (if tech LBOs prove more cyclical than thought?)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/which-top-fund-will-go-bust#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/12612</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/5">Private Iniquity</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:20:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jajaja</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12612 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sweatshop list</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/sweatshop-list</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m interested in compiling a list of the tier 1/1a/2 shops that are total sweatshops (i.e. work you like a banker). I&#039;m interested to see if any of these actually offers a liveable environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please only post data if you have 1st hand knowledge from someone actually working there...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Confirmed:&lt;br /&gt;
Baincap&lt;br /&gt;
KKR&lt;br /&gt;
Bstone&lt;br /&gt;
Carlyle&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Confirmed Not:&lt;br /&gt;
a few Euro-funds - Cinven, Apax, BC partners&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/sweatshop-list&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/sweatshop-list#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/900</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/5">Private Iniquity</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:31:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jajaja</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">900 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gender bias</title>
 <link>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/gender-bias</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;hmm, the salary survey shows that males get slightly more on base (marginally higher ranked employers, I guess, but basically (no pun intended) the same).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However they do get 1.5% or so more on bonus. Is this significative?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/gender-bias#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/322</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/26">I-Banking Bullpen</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 06:09:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jajaja</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">322 at http://www.wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
