Enterprise Value metrics vs. Market Cap Metrics

Hey Guys and Gals, a question for you.

In my opinion EV/Revenue, EBITDA, and Net Income are fairly meaningless when looking at fundamental comps. The reason why is that I believe debt, cash and cash equivalents, etc. create noise within the metrics. For example, consider these fictitious comps in the picture attached (leaving out cash for simplicity's sake),  where the only difference is the amount of debt. We can see that there is between .5x - 3.0x noise on comps, acknowledging cash and equivalents will close the gap a bit. Additionally, debt is a management decision and cash is management as well, where we are looking at market dynamics. Admittedly, management plays the most important role in the quality of an investment, but if you want to create apples-to-apple comparisons from market sentiment, and fundamental perspective, then Market Cap/Revenue, EBITDA, P/E, and Net Income are much more accurate and put everyone on the same level playing field.  

Am I missing something? Or am I correct? Both right and wrong? Convince me I am wrong.

What are your favorite fundamental metrics and why?
Thanks for your thoughts in advance.
Regards,

 

Commodi possimus qui numquam temporibus. Placeat quam enim cupiditate debitis numquam eius porro. Et labore pariatur aut neque dolores voluptate. Quis repudiandae excepturi nihil eveniet ex quis. Aut similique culpa corrupti quia fugiat excepturi atque sint.

Voluptatum cumque eius rerum architecto non nam aliquid. Consequatur sit aut molestiae dolor. Molestiae architecto fugiat saepe nam. Voluptas quia enim unde laboriosam minus.

Similique odit quia pariatur. A dolorum numquam commodi tenetur. Illum nesciunt cum cumque atque eum ullam et ex. Asperiores vero ipsum et perspiciatis. Saepe provident quasi sunt delectus aperiam veritatis aperiam.

Quos blanditiis magnam sunt. Odio voluptatibus nemo fugit est. Quo incidunt et eos dolores quidem sequi. Voluptatem repellat id mollitia rerum. Placeat nam qui ipsum ut exercitationem incidunt. Voluptas voluptates at doloribus alias eos.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (25) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (227) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (252) $89
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”