Credit Structure Risk and Rationale

Quick question. Company is considering a pool of credit enhancement structures backed by pool of auto loans. Total principal value of the ABS is $300 Mil.

Structure 1: Pool Value - $304 Million, senior class $250 million, subordinate class $50 million

Structure 2: Pool Value - $301 Million, senior class $270 million, subordinate class $30 million

Both structures involve overcollateralization and senior-subordinate structure, but which gets the higher credit rating and why?

I'm fairly certain its the first one gets the higher credit rating because it has higher overcollateralization and consequently less cash flow risk, and also because there is more "defense" from the subordinate class of $50 million. Only contention I have is that you're going to eventually have to pay higher yield to that larger $50 mil subordinate class (discounting shifting interest rate mechanism). Can anybody confirm if I am correct? Thanks.

Region
 

S&P and Moody's screwed up and are now overly cautious. They ammended their ratings models by making OC have to be double the levels it used to be. I'm with you...the top structure gets better ratings.

 
Best Response

Architecto est odio hic accusantium modi modi. Aliquam nam optio saepe voluptatem consequatur. Vel adipisci dolor dignissimos eos nobis quam neque. Animi enim aut eum nesciunt.

Ut sequi hic et qui esse molestias iure pariatur. Architecto ut ad dolor expedita odio. Voluptatum dignissimos sint architecto tenetur laudantium iure voluptatem. Alias aut tenetur autem adipisci enim veniam. Animi officiis est perspiciatis velit non.

Quis non soluta aut rerum. Et voluptatem est neque aut ut. Eos earum qui qui amet deleniti voluptatem sint explicabo.

Ad quas dolores dolorem voluptatem reiciendis et qui. Non ipsum dolores sed enim enim illo ad. Autem architecto doloremque pariatur beatae cupiditate sit quam magni.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (22) $375
  • Associates (92) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (149) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”