Implications of a long non compete as a grad?
I interned at a pretty good fund during college and was extended a return offer to join them after graduation. However, I recently interviewed with a renowned pod that is widely recognized as the top place in the market, and I've been offered a position with them upon my graduation in a couple of months. I genuinely admire the team and the role they are offering, but they are requesting that I sign a 12-month non-compete agreement, which seems rather aggressive.
While I understand that in the best-case scenario, if I stay with this firm until I reach a senior position, a 12-month non-compete might not be as significant of a concern. However, I'm apprehensive about the potential implications if I decide to leave after a couple of years. Such a restrictive agreement could pose a significant hurdle in securing another opportunity in the future.
If anyone can just explain how non competes work in more detail and their thoughts on having such a large one at this level I would really appreciate it!
Non-competes are standard. If the non-compete ban makes it through to law then it's not an issue. Many firms will wait out non-competes to secure top talent. Some recruiters have told me that having a longer non-compete can make you seem more valuable but not sure if that has much validity.
Any top firm will not care about a potential hire’s noncompete period… very much standard across the buyside so it’s a given and they will wait for top talent.
This shouldn’t really factor into your decision… it’s not like you’re in a position to push back anyways
Iusto aliquam sunt reprehenderit iure ducimus. Qui deserunt pariatur non quidem et. Provident et necessitatibus dolore. Expedita quidem sit itaque dolorem. Molestiae assumenda similique assumenda maxime corporis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...