Only KKR would have the hubris to “re-invent” stock based compensation
Why is this being taken so seriously?
Trending Content
| +97 | Sr Asso / VP Unemployment Check-in | 59 | 6h | |
| +39 | What did you do after signing? | 13 | 6h | |
| +26 | PE Recruiting From IB- Play It Safe Or Reach For Best Fund Possible? | 11 | 1d | |
| +26 | PE / IB in NYC from Cambridge compared to US colleges | 26 | 19h | |
| +25 | Resume Gap after 2.5 Years in PE | 5 | 3d | |
| +23 | Where is there untapped value in secondaries? | 14 | 9h | |
| +21 | Public company LBO | 8 | 15h | |
| +20 | Vista Lateral Associate | 12 | 5d | |
| +19 | VP HF Lateral to PE | 1 | 4d | |
| +17 | What is GS Private Equity like? | 6 | 8h |
Career Resources
Lol, I remember glancing a similar headline and thinking, isn’t that just stock-based comp?
Either the journalists are morons or just owned.
The whole point is that it goes to rank and file employees, which is definitely not the typical SBC usage
Lmao yeh this is pretty absurd. They made crazy headlines with their Gardner Denver deal when they issued options. Isn’t partnership half of what PE is about
Suscipit cupiditate vel recusandae dignissimos veritatis cupiditate. Velit velit consectetur dolore asperiores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...