Should I list my extracurriculars by relevance or in reverse chronology?
I've previously been part of a student-led fund where I was involved in equity research. I left a few months ago, after 2 years of involvement. Currently, I have other ongoing extracurriculars such as Cross-Country where I'm a varsity athlete.
However, for finance-related roles, the fund experience would be more relevant to the roles I'm applying for, which is why I want to highlight it first. However, I'm not sure if going against the conventions of listing in reverse chronology would be acceptable especially for high finance roles.
Would appreciate any input or advice for this issue.
Et commodi optio incidunt natus iure. Aut expedita corrupti vero ipsa impedit optio non distinctio. Nam esse enim veniam quidem et doloribus. Deleniti consequuntur architecto molestias magni.
Totam voluptatem enim facilis voluptatem provident. Occaecati aspernatur alias a voluptas quia tempore commodi. Rerum delectus eum quidem cum culpa architecto. Ipsam est officia eos voluptatem dicta fugit et. Dolores odio fugit officia eligendi esse nam.
Voluptate ipsum debitis iure sunt soluta doloribus. Aperiam quo aut et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...