Stupid question about VC terminology

Rather limited exposure to the world of VC, so forgive the elementary question. When a VC investor goes into a, say, Series A round, he gets preferred shares. Let's say he gets a 1x liquidation preference, and no participation rights.

Where does his return come from? 1x basically means he gets his money back. And because there are no participation rights, he doesn't get the 1x and then the opportunity to participate as a common shareholder, right? In actuality, do preferred investors typically get participation rights? Or do preferred investors usually have the right to convert their shares to common once the return to common > their cost/share?

Insight here would be appreciated.

Thanks!
BR

 
Best Response

Here's the answer. VC terminology sounds more complicated that it really is.

Preferred shares are senior to common and usually have an annual dividend (although most times the dividend just accrues and gets paid on exit). In an exit scenario preferred shares receive their initial investment + dividends.

Participation allows preferred shares to also take their pro rata of exit value. So as an example, if I invested $10M in a company and own 10% of it (so, 100M equity value), and it exits for that amount, I first receive back my $10M and then 10% of the remaining exit value ($90M in this case). This of course, assumes I am the only preferred investment.

1x liquidation preference means that as preferred, you are entitled to receive 1x your initial investment in an exit scenario. However, if the exit is at a valuation higher than where you invested (which is always the hope), then you have the option to convert your shares into common, and thereby participate at your pro rata and receive more than 1x your initial investment. So in the above example, if I had just straight preferred with no participation and the company in question exits at $50M, I would not convert, because 10% of $50M is less than my initial investment. However, if the company has a $200MM exit, I would convert, because 10% of $200M is $20M, which is 2x my initial investment of $10M.

Hope it's helpful.

 
CaliBankerSF:
Here's the answer. VC terminology sounds more complicated that it really is.

Preferred shares are senior to common and usually have an annual dividend (although most times the dividend just accrues and gets paid on exit). In an exit scenario preferred shares receive their initial investment + dividends.

Participation allows preferred shares to also take their pro rata of exit value. So as an example, if I invested $10M in a company and own 10% of it (so, 100M equity value), and it exits for that amount, I first receive back my $10M and then 10% of the remaining exit value ($90M in this case). This of course, assumes I am the only preferred investment.

1x liquidation preference means that as preferred, you are entitled to receive 1x your initial investment in an exit scenario. However, if the exit is at a valuation higher than where you invested (which is always the hope), then you have the option to convert your shares into common, and thereby participate at your pro rata and receive more than 1x your initial investment. So in the above example, if I had just straight preferred with no participation and the company in question exits at $50M, I would not convert, because 10% of $50M is less than my initial investment. However, if the company has a $200MM exit, I would convert, because 10% of $200M is $20M, which is 2x my initial investment of $10M.

Hope it's helpful.

SB for thoroughness and accuracy, which probably saved several of us a few minutes.

 
CaliBankerSF:
Here's the answer. VC terminology sounds more complicated that it really is.

Preferred shares are senior to common and usually have an annual dividend (although most times the dividend just accrues and gets paid on exit). In an exit scenario preferred shares receive their initial investment + dividends.

Participation allows preferred shares to also take their pro rata of exit value. So as an example, if I invested $10M in a company and own 10% of it (so, 100M equity value), and it exits for that amount, I first receive back my $10M and then 10% of the remaining exit value ($90M in this case). This of course, assumes I am the only preferred investment.

1x liquidation preference means that as preferred, you are entitled to receive 1x your initial investment in an exit scenario. However, if the exit is at a valuation higher than where you invested (which is always the hope), then you have the option to convert your shares into common, and thereby participate at your pro rata and receive more than 1x your initial investment. So in the above example, if I had just straight preferred with no participation and the company in question exits at $50M, I would not convert, because 10% of $50M is less than my initial investment. However, if the company has a $200MM exit, I would convert, because 10% of $200M is $20M, which is 2x my initial investment of $10M.

Hope it's helpful.

Definitely a SB-worth answer.

‎"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to become the means by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of other men. Blood, whips and guns or dollars."
 

Repudiandae aut iure laudantium vitae asperiores quia ad. Ut sint sunt molestias omnis molestias facilis at consequuntur.

Reiciendis quia voluptatem autem at culpa quia aspernatur sapiente. Excepturi praesentium aperiam qui debitis. Minus nulla expedita recusandae et quas. Fugit itaque recusandae sunt nemo vitae quisquam. Necessitatibus aut sint eveniet minus. Ut alias dolorem non quibusdam nesciunt. Harum dicta qui earum repudiandae et libero.

Officiis non deleniti provident deleniti. Neque dignissimos sint cum architecto quia omnis quisquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”