Are "Duties of Fidelity" Causing Harm?
As most of you know by now, former UBS trader Kweku Adoboli is on trial right now for a $2.3 billion trading loss which he conducted without authorization. On November 8th, the closing arguments were heard for both the prosecutors adn the defense, and it seemes that the alleged charges of "off-book, unhedged, and concealed" trades have "detailed and technical evidence from wtinesses" to back them up. However, I think there is more to this than meets the eye.
In this article, Adoboli's side is given a fair look as well. Adoboli claims he wasn't a rogue trader, and that his reckless behavior was known to colleagues and at times even encouraged.The troubling part is that even if this were true, there is a lack of evidence-- not because it isn't there, but because the culture, or "machine," of the bank prevents witnesses from coming forth. Thus, corrobations of his story cannot occur.
lawyer for UBS, pored over the terms of employee contracts. He said that during or after their employment UBS staff were free to give evidence in criminal proceedings, even though their contract includes a duty of fidelity not to say anything derogatory about the bank. Mr Adoboli says UBS “gagged” potential defence witnesses.Yesterday, Ms Wass called a final witness to unpick that bit of the defence. Jamie Howard, an employment
I would love to know how one can simultaneously offer evidence in criminal proceedings with this underlying "duty of fidelity." Not only are there no measures to prevent inevitable backlash against those who do the right thing, (not saying there are such witnesses in this specific incidence, but just generally speaking) but what does "derogatory" mean? If an employee steps to the plate and admits that there was awareness and encouragement of Adoboli's behavior, would he be being derogative by calling UBS a bunch of crooks? Food for thought.
On the other hand, Adoboli hasn't helped himself either. He lied to accountant William Steward to "buy himself time." He lied in an email where he confessed to acting alone. He also lied to UBS's own investigators. However, the problem still remains that if he, or any other suspect in a similar case, is indeed innocent, then a culture of secrecy would kill their chances at freedom.
There is no doubt that the trades caused tremendous losses to UBS and its clients, and that Adoboli conducted them. The question is whether the "machine" at the firm is working its power to place the blame solely on him, rather than diluting it throughout the firm and hurting its image. It's much easier to say that there was a rogue trader than to continue to embody the stereotype of greedy financiers. What do you guys think of this case?
"Others/His supervisors working at the bank were aware of and encouraged his methods so long as they generated profits". Mr. Adoboli surely wasn't stopped/caught earlier because he reported huge fictitious profits which were the base of his inflated bonuses. Had he not fabricated profits with fictitious trades, common sense tells he wouldn't have lasted. Is that the Bank's fault ? Which bank wants to see losses ?
"UBS staff were free to give evidence in criminal proceedings, even though their contract includes a duty of fidelity not to say anything derogatory about the bank". There, the UBS lawyer crushed Adoboli's purported defense. A "duty of fidelity" is not a conduit to fraudulent behavior. "Culture of secrecy" is Adoboli's lawyer working the imagination of the jury. He has no defense.
I say he's not guilty, but good luck keeping a black guy from Wall Street out of jail.
Molestiae quis aut facilis recusandae expedita cupiditate. Deleniti ipsa inventore et incidunt maiores porro. Voluptas molestiae explicabo qui iusto delectus. Repudiandae cumque doloremque dicta et aliquid quam quia.
Tempora ut consequatur delectus iure ducimus maiores officia. Corporis quam et temporibus iusto deleniti numquam et. Aut non est adipisci temporibus quaerat. Minima ipsum voluptas corporis natus iusto magnam tempore enim.
Veniam et animi incidunt sed ratione vel. Eos minima id nihil tempore temporibus in corporis a. Nobis placeat nobis sed non. Nobis voluptas eum iste eos voluptate ipsum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...