Conflict of Interest - Unfair but Necessary?

Misaligned incentives seem to be a common trait in selling financial products. After issuer-paid credit ratings and stock exchanges which cater to high frequency traders, even data releases are not immune to such practices. Thomson Reuters is now under investigation for releasing a well-known customer confidence survey two seconds earlier to select clients for a $6K/month fee. In terms of information fairness, they issue is clear - high frequency traders have a huge advantage other short term traders without such information. However, what is the alternative?


Like free email, the market does not support the conflict-free model for these industries. Few customers are willing to pay for basic email or credit ratings. The later is especially difficult to conceal at the high level because of the ease of free-riding (e.g. a AAA for a company only takes three characters to send and the issuer wants it to be as well known as possible). How else can such companies compete when everybody wants it but nobody is willing to pay by themselves? This is not a defense of such practices, but rather an investigation as to the why.

While we may want this:

(Source: http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2012/01/25/thursday-president-obama-fairness/)

It may be very hard to achieve "absolute" fairness without paying for it in some other way.

This brings up a larger question: are the most profitable operations, in finance and beyond, riddled with conflict of interest? Does "fair" mean unprofitable? As Hank Greenberg once said, "All I want in life is an unfair advantage."

(icon source: http://www.davenussbaum.com/forget-about-fairness/)

 
Best Response

we also need to investigate anyone using a bloomberg. Not everyone can afford a 2000 dollar a month fee, so therefore it gives them an unfair advantage. Also bloomberg gives you news way too fast, it takes soooooo long for yahoo finance news to get updated.

Also its not fair that some people get a leg up that have access to nasdaq level 2 quotes. this creates an uneven playing field for people who only have access to level 1 on yahoo finance. We need to investigate anyone who has level 2 quotes.

also while we're at it. lets investigate, anyone using any programming of any kind (including excel) to make trades. Some people dont know how to program or use excel. Why should the people that cant program spend ten years learning to code when the govt. can just make it illegal to use a program to trade. That would create an even playing field.

Also anyone that uses anything beyond algebra in making trading/investing decisions should also be banned from trading. Otherwise people that are good at like calculus, are gonna take all the money away from everyone! This would definitely create a level playing field.

so if we do these things it would make it more fair and level playing field, for ordinary investors so that they are not at a disadvantage. otherwise all those mathematicians are going to steal from everyones pension funds.

sarcasm

in all seriousness, I dont see the issue here with what reuters did. If these firms can afford an advantage then good for them. eventually the price of that data should converge with whatever advantage its actually worth. good for the hft firms and good for reuters for making the market more efficient.

 

Enim voluptatem laboriosam facilis velit placeat sint illum beatae. Nobis occaecati tempora sed qui rerum ipsam voluptas. Ut aut debitis aut unde. Hic enim necessitatibus aperiam dolor aut.

Voluptatem at blanditiis natus voluptatem ab. Recusandae ut adipisci qui nobis. Consequuntur harum fuga exercitationem et.

Nesciunt et reprehenderit sint sit sit. Recusandae dicta iure praesentium enim. Nesciunt excepturi laudantium error beatae. Quibusdam maxime sint voluptatem voluptatem aut. Est qui aut facilis voluptatem.

Ut enim excepturi repellat et esse nobis dolores. Et est provident cupiditate velit odio delectus non dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”