Is the king dead? Doth the emperor wear no clothes? I hardly doubt anybody will be holding a wake forany time soon, but it is an indisputable reality that the (perhaps soon to be ex) King of Wall Street is reeling and on the ropes.
The [/embed] it does indicate a great deal about where some insiders think the bulge bracket power is headed. Lansdowne is, after all, Europe's biggest hedge fund and in many ways can be looked to as a point of reference along the lines of a rating agency.sale of its entire $850 million Goldman stake may even be an unofficial industry acknowledgement of Goldman's fall from grace. Though the sales figure represents the tiniest fraction of Goldman's actual worth
Though the rationale given in the article is usual no moresimplification, one has to wonder what else lies beyond the following words:
Part of Lansdowne's decision-making process is understood to have focused on the reduction in the value of Goldman's proprietaryoperations as a result of regulatory changes in the US.
Under the so-called Volcker rules - named after former US Treasury secretary Paul Volcker - enshrined within the recent Dodd-Frank legislation, Goldman has seen its lucrative proprietary investing curtailed. It has also suffered as a result of industry reductions in the use of leverage, or gearing, following the financial crisis, which was one of the ways it used to make money when trading from its own book. In addition, Goldman, like other banks, is also making the transition towards much more onerous global capital requirements under the new Basel III requirements.
As a result of these changes, Goldman's return on equity has reduced from a traditional 24pc to 30pc range to approximately 15pc.
With Goldman now struggling to reach profit forecasts, what will Lloyd and Gary's boys turn to for a revenue boost? Do I dare make some sort of joke about chickens coming home to roost?
A few years back we all sat back and laughed at the government's inability to effectually police and punish Goldman Sachs, in tomorrow's post I will speculate on precisely why we were dead wrong. In the meanwhile, I would like to solicit some opinions on Goldman and where you guys think their gilded ship is headed. Obviously, the industry as a whole is taking some lumps right now and Goldman is still very, very far from being in any sort of tangible danger. Still, when you've been the baddest man on the planet for so long, it just takes one Buster Douglas to send your world spinning upside down.
Goldman's not dead by a long shot, but I can't say that I am not a bit tickled to see them knocked off the perch a few notches. How about yourself?