Hood Rich

One of my last posts of 2010, addressed the wealthiest living areas in the country.

Today, we go from macro to micro...so feast your eyes on America's most affluent neighborhoods.

Surprise, surprise... ain't it ya'll!?

Once upon a time selling equities in Dallas was akin to a military post in Antarctica for the average finance professional. Not so anymore. Times keep changing.

The tiny town of Westlake, Texas is the most fiscally exclusive domestic playground in the nation.

Imagine living in a place where the average annual income is $250,000.

Hard to fathom for a blue collar guy like me. The block I grew up on you would have to keep that sort of money buried...next to your own corpse if anybody caught wind of it.

Not surprisingly a Chicago, Boston and New York area suburban hideaway cracked the top 5, but shockingly (to me at least)...the number 3 spot went to Mission Hills, Kansas, home of former Royals legend George Brett.

I am tempted to say that this quick micro economic snapshot is indicative of a change in wealth distribution among the country's fiscal elites. I am also quite surprised by the lack of Newport Beach, California on this list.

What does this list say to you guys, if anything at all?

Are we seeing a slow but steady demographic changing of the guard in the ranks of America's wealthy?

Which will be the richest neighborhoods in the country come two decades from today?

With the impending doom presiding over their respective state budgets, I am tempted to say that California, Illinois and New York will have zero representatives in the top 5, within the next twenty years.

Who's with me? Why or why not?

 
Midas Mulligan Magoo:
last time i checked you're bringing home $200 per week more on every $100K earned in texas vs ny/dc/la

so... ya think??

10K in my pocket every year would be a nice incentive to move

“I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me.” - Malone
 
JMBeta:
Midas Mulligan Magoo:
last time i checked you're bringing home $200 per week more on every $100K earned in texas vs ny/dc/la

so... ya think??

10K in my pocket every year would be a nice incentive to move

Let's also keep in mind what Uncle Eddie referred to as G.R.I.T.S. -- Girls Raised In The South!

 
adapt or die][quote=Edmundo Braverman:
Not only do I have a friend who lives in Westlake, I can confirm that a current member of WSO slept with George Brett's ex-wife. So there's that.

That's shocking George Brett's wife would be inclined to cheat on him, as he's running around shitting himself in the Mirage in Vegas

]

Haha that shitting in the Mirage video is classic. Perhaps more so than the pine tar incident.

Eddie, this current WSO member is either full of shit or has mistaken his current wife for his ex wife. He's only been married to one woman.

There's no way these rankings anywhere near accurate. I'm from Kansas City and grew up by Mission Hills. It's a very nice area but at least half of the homes in this town of a few thousand people are pretty modest. The 250K + jobs in KC are few and far between and Mission Hills has a lot of old money. People with decent jobs who inherited a shit load of money. In addition, there's only 2 billionaires living in MH, so it's not like there's any kind of skewness going on here. There's no way Mission Hills trumps some tony suburb out in Silicon Valley or Connecticut or even Houston.

 
kmzz:
you really have to define the parameters (ex: population size, w/e) rankings will drastically change and you can really make any good place #1 if you limit your scope

westlake has 702 residents and income is 250k this is not that impressive as places like atherton have 7500 people (2500 households) with avg (household) income of 380k

Agreed. Towns that have so few residents can definitely be skewed by a few incredibly wealthy residents, which may not give an accurate picture of the whole neighborhood. Most of these places are "villages" anyway - try looking at places with 2500+, 5000+, 7500+, etc. population (like Atherton).

Hi, Eric Stratton, rush chairman, damn glad to meet you.
 
Cartwright:
I would live in shanty in Highland Park before a manse in Westlake.

That snark is probably only relatable for a tiny fraction of the WSO audience,

That's the funny thing. Highland Park and Preston Hollow are considered the nicest neghborhoods in Dallas. Preston Hollow is insane. I'm surprised it's not on there.

 
ibintx:
Cartwright:
I would live in shanty in Highland Park before a manse in Westlake.

That snark is probably only relatable for a tiny fraction of the WSO audience,

That's the funny thing. Highland Park and Preston Hollow are considered the nicest neghborhoods in Dallas. Preston Hollow is insane. I'm surprised it's not on there.

to be a parky you have to carry a skateboard and a lacrosse stick around everywhere though, and that is just too cumbersome

 
Cartwright:
I would live in shanty in Highland Park before a manse in Westlake.

That snark is probably only relatable for a tiny fraction of the WSO audience,

Agreed wholeheartedly. Highland Park is first class, but I'd still rather live in Preston Hollow.

 
porkbellies:
Cartwright:
I would live in shanty in Highland Park before a manse in Westlake.

That snark is probably only relatable for a tiny fraction of the WSO audience,

Agreed wholeheartedly. Highland Park is first class, but I'd still rather live in Preston Hollow.

North of NW Highway? I assumed it was all farmland.

If you do PH it has to be real Preston Hollow (West of the tollway).

 

Averages can be misleading, though... all it takes is for one billionaire to move into a small town, and the average income of the town can shoot up like crazy even if everybody is making $60k a year. If the MEDIAN income was $250,000 I'd be way more impressed...

Wall Street leaders now understand that they made a mistake, one born of their innocent and trusting nature. They trusted ordinary Americans to behave more responsibly than they themselves ever would, and these ordinary Americans betrayed their trust.
 
Beef:
Averages can be misleading, though... all it takes is for one billionaire to move into a small town, and the average income of the town can shoot up like crazy even if everybody is making $60k a year. If the MEDIAN income was $250,000 I'd be way more impressed...

The numbers listed ARE the medians

 
Beef:
Averages can be misleading, though... all it takes is for one billionaire to move into a small town, and the average income of the town can shoot up like crazy even if everybody is making $60k a year. If the MEDIAN income was $250,000 I'd be way more impressed...
$250,000 is the MEDIAN income, read the article - 3rd paragraph down
 

Texas has come a long way over the last few decades, and I expect to see more communities on that list from Texas in the future. However, I believe the the presence of many other inland communities on that list, along with the fall from grace of New York and California are cyclical occurrences. New York and California always tend to do very well when times are good, and very poorly when times are bad. There's a reason why real estate in New York and California continue to be incredibly expensive, even in times like now. It's because a very large number of America's elite view moving inland as giving up on their dreams. If you don't believe me, talk to some ivy leaguers and see how many of them plan on moving to the Midwest at some point in their lives.

Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions. -Niccolo Machiavelli
 

I will vouch for this area as absurdly wealthy being as that I work here. It's worth noting, that Southlake (next door) is basically the same area as Westlake. My coworkers and I pass by Mark Teixeira old home while on our way to a BBQ restaurant across the street from Sandra Bullock's home. There is a lot of money here and everyone who lives here knows it, plus a alot of good looking wives!

 
Midas Mulligan Magoo:
Imagine living in a place where the average annual income is $250,000.

Well, it all depends on what constitutes an "area". I could circle three adjacent houses in Bumfuck, Montana to create an "area" with an income larger than 250K. But if I stretch it out to include the nearby Indian reservation, the average income drops to $500.00.

So the question is, how are the boundaries of these "areas" determined?

 

kind of a stupid article. I live in an exclusive community behind gates with less than 50 houses and the average income is much higher. Take out the one really rich guy who's on the Forbes list and the average is still probably over 500k. I know the salaries of a few friends in there and I can't think of anyone below 500k.

And I don't consider it to be super rich. Just well above average.

I'm actually surprised that given the tenor of the article the average isn't 10 times as high or more.

I rich, smarts, and totally in debt.
 
MrDouche:
kind of a stupid article. I live in an exclusive community behind gates with less than 50 houses and the average income is much higher. Take out the one really rich guy who's on the Forbes list and the average is still probably over 500k. I know the salaries of a few friends in there and I can't think of anyone below 500k.

And I don't consider it to be super rich. Just well above average.

I'm actually surprised that given the tenor of the article the average isn't 10 times as high or more.

Totally agree, most of these studies are horseshit. Forget the millionaires with average incomes in the six figures, how about billionaires per capita? I imagine Manhattan would win by a long stretch. If some russian or middle eastern oligarch wants to buy a place in the US where he is most likely to bump into billionaires in his neighborhood, dallas would not be the first place to look.

 

Interesting article, the more I read about Texas the more interested I get...

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

Ha! This is quite amazing. I'm literally weeks away from moving to Mission Hills, KS (or right adjacent to it). The most arrogant Manhattanite would be envious of some of the beautiful, huge houses in Mission Hills. I kind of assumed wealth there was "relative" but given the figure of $243,000 for median household income and I'd say that place is downright rich. By the way, there are 3,100 residents of Mission Hills, KS so it's not like there are 10 rich people.

Array
 
Cartwright:
your roommate went to high school in Austin...also a very nice area, but different westlake.

Yep, easily confusable. Wesltake in Austin is home to many loaded folks, including Michael Dell. Their football team is dominant bc of the money spent on training those kids since lower school--trust me it's ridiculous. I thought that was the Westlake on here at first too. Too bad Westlake (Austin) kids are dbags.

 
ibintx:
Their football team is dominant bc of the money spent on training those kids since lower school--trust me it's ridiculous.

Any private school worth it's salt also spends that money on athletic scholarships for broke kids.

 

Despite the debate over how and why the lines are drawn where they are, you can't argue Texas' emergence as a place where more and more UHNW individuals are living/moving.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Et sit velit porro iure. Ab repudiandae laborum esse ut ipsa consectetur omnis sint. Dolorem tempora aut aliquid fugiat a. Enim debitis quidem placeat. Sed nulla iure nulla perspiciatis et voluptate natus. Harum totam et veniam est non ad accusantium id.

Tempore voluptatem assumenda et sed vero temporibus. Voluptatibus consequatur rerum quia ducimus voluptatem illo placeat est. Totam et voluptas rem repellendus repellendus quaerat.

Enim corrupti vitae temporibus dolor aliquid. Nihil numquam dicta eius consequatur. Unde quas in vel sint est. Libero consequatur quibusdam rerum dolor nihil rerum laborum.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”