Israel, the Middle East and our Defense Industry

Israel claims it’s ready for a 30 day war with Iran. Not really surprising, saber-rattling has been rampant in the area since the relative peace and Israeli dominance in the area after the last Lebanon conflict and the recent Gaza War. With organizations such as Hezbollah having Iranian backing, Israel has an excellent entry into conflict with Iran, regardless of Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Hezbollah hardly has a clean record, and is said to be responsible on the recent attack on Israeli citizens in Bulgaria.

What does it mean? Well, these potential actions have already led to new purchases from the United States defense industry; more C130J Super Hercules aircraft from Lockheed Martin, good for us defense industry goons. Since battlefield casualties are only numbers for strategic planners, let’s talk dollars and history.

Israel's battlefield exports are a global success, from radar jammers in Indian Mig 21 aircraft to Tavor assault rifles for the Brazilians. And this stuff works, take it from me. They have made a name for themselves in the global defense market with advanced technology inspired by and tested in nearly constant conflict. If you monkeys didn’t know already, the 1948 War, Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War were not only tragedies of blatant aggression by neighboring Arab states, but the latter two were also an excellent test bed for Soviet and American backers.

The Cold War had very few instances of eastern and western top-of-the-line hardware going head to head. What better way to see how it goes than shipping your best stuff to the Middle East for free? The Soviets seemed to go even further than the west, sometimes sending their most advanced aircraft, such as the Mig-31, into the area.

Times have changed. The Middle East has become more of a mess than ever. The US backs Arab states that fund terrorist groups through private routes, and Israel has certainly learned to build its own hardware, albeit with some US dough. There a couple of possibilities here:
First, Iran really does want to attack Israel. Iran, against all common sense and urges of self preservation, wants to attack Israel using conventional or nuclear weapons, disregarding the certain global backlash and its own guaranteed destruction by what would most likely be a large coalition. Israel must prepare for retaliation or a first strike, although the late Golda Mayer wouldn’t be down with the second option. Israel would no doubt come out as the victor, although it would still have to be careful with regards of the conflict’s "intensity dial." Let me explain. The first notch on the intensity dial would be something similar to the NATO airstrikes in the Libyan Civil War. No troop presence on our behalf, only air strikes on key targets. The tenth notch would be the Eastern Front of World War Two for the Germans: scorched earth, with civilians given no opportunity to wage a guerilla war (or survive).

Iran’s state run media means extensive propaganda, which could in turn mean very motivated civilians prepared to carry out a lengthy guerilla campaign. Common sense and geography would state reality would lean more towards notch one, given between the two nations is Syria/Jordan and Iraq. Let’s not forget, however, that Israeli attack aircraft lack the range to attack Iran from home. Perhaps the utilization of a US airbase abroad might have to occur, with potential for naval conflict. Naval conflict that would no doubt disturb oil transportation, a throwback to Iran’s last major conflict with Iraq.

Second, Israel wants to attack Iran because of a hunch combined with some intelligence of their nuclear program and terrorist-backing. Sounds aggressive, but we all remember Iraq. Combined with a nation’s natural desire to exercise dominance in an area full of nations that don’t recognize its legitimacy, Israel feels it needs to start wielding that saber. It has been stated time and time again, even in a recent CNN interview with US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta after his recent trip to Israel, that

Iran has not decided whether or not it will use its nuclear technology to build the bomb.
With Iran being the only hostile nation in the area with the solidarity and strength to pose a threat to Israel, a preemptive strike based on no real Iranian nuclear threat still seems like a war worth waging. Pro Palestinian folks sometimes ask "What would you do if you were a Palestinian?" It’s a worthy situation to consider.

Another hypothetical situation worth considering is what the US would do if they had Iran within the strike area of medium range missiles. A recent Guardian article states that an Israeli official predicts "around 500 deaths in such a clash." Seems low, but then again I doubt they consider civilian casualties. Apparently no one does anymore. Regardless, sanctions and talks are failing. It seems as though violence is unavoidable given current administrations. Let’s not forget how Israel made a daring attack on Saddam’s nuclear facility in 1981. We should assume they are fully prepared to destroy anything they see as a potential nuclear threat.

What effect will this have on US industry if we don’t get involved? With Lockheed Martin providing Israel with new C130J transport aircraft and the powerful Israeli Air Force being made up of Boeing’s F-15 and Lockheed Martin’s second most advanced Block 52 F-16, any potential conflict will increase sales to these contractors already making it big in the Middle East. They will need parts, munitions and most likely more technical advisors. These large firms are moving to more sales in the area with looming DoD budget cuts. This isn’t even including the numerous other systems and small arms US firms such as Raytheon and ATK provide.

Interestingly, the only nation with a more advanced version of the F-16 is the United Arab Emirates, which still does not officially recognize Israel’s existence. Strange? It’s no surprise many of these firms’ top brass are made up of former Pentagon officials and fromer diplomats.

What’s better than selling an advanced piece of military hardware that came to be through taxpayer-funded R&D?
Potential death and destruction means more money and more employment here in one of our most profitable sectors. I feel so dirty.

What if we do get involved? Well, that’s another story, and messy wouldn’t even begin to describe it, but the industry will profit. The industry always profits.

 

Thing is, the regime in Iran only have the support of maybe 10% of the population.

If you attack Iran:

a) The majority of the population will rally around the regime.

b) Iran will destabilize Irak and Afghanistan via their network (notice the recent bombings there)

c) Since they don't have the military capability to face Israel, they'll target israelis wherever they can find them (e.g. tourists in Bulgaria, the diplomats in India and Thailand)

It will be an attrition type of warfare.

Obviously, as a result, expect the governement to take more of your freedoms away to make you more secure. In sum, it will be a shit show.

 

Out of curiosity, how many here would support a United Nations alliance effort into intervention in Iran?

Call me cynical in my years, but I'm starting to wonder why we have an army in Afghanistan, (it's been there for longer than we had forces in europe for both the world wars combined). If people want to fight it out between them, thats their prerogative. I don't see why we have to get involved unless there is a return on it. I have no problem sending missiles into territories that have openly declared hostility against my own nation (and sending the invoices for said missiles to the people that want this bunch overthrown).

On a related note, the UK is still giving hundreds of millions to India, which has it's own space program, and we export fuck all to them for our troubles.

 
trazer985:
On a related note, the UK is still giving hundreds of millions to India, which has it's own space program, and we export fuck all to them for our troubles.

What are you talking about , BAE sells Billions of dollars to India? And the RAF trains Indian fighter pilots regularly. Do you think David Cameron goes there because the curry is better?

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/goldman-sachs><abbr title=Goldman Sachs&#10;>GS</abbr></a></span>:
trazer985:
On a related note, the UK is still giving hundreds of millions to India, which has it's own space program, and we export fuck all to them for our troubles.

What are you talking about , BAE sells Billions of dollars to India? And the RAF trains Indian fighter pilots regularly. Do you think David Cameron goes there because the curry is better?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-16809532 this is what I'm talking about.

 
trazer985:
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/goldman-sachs><abbr title=Goldman Sachs&#10;>GS</abbr></a></span>:
trazer985:
On a related note, the UK is still giving hundreds of millions to India, which has it's own space program, and we export fuck all to them for our troubles.

What are you talking about , BAE sells Billions of dollars to India? And the RAF trains Indian fighter pilots regularly. Do you think David Cameron goes there because the curry is better?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-16809532 this is what I'm talking about.

o, so the french were finally able to sell one of their toys. Isn't it like their 1st sell ever?

And it's not even a final sale. India might be using them as a leverage.

 
Best Response
Abdel:
trazer985:
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/goldman-sachs><abbr title=Goldman Sachs&#10;>GS</abbr></a></span>:
trazer985:
On a related note, the UK is still giving hundreds of millions to India, which has it's own space program, and we export fuck all to them for our troubles.

What are you talking about , BAE sells Billions of dollars to India? And the RAF trains Indian fighter pilots regularly. Do you think David Cameron goes there because the curry is better?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-16809532 this is what I'm talking about.

o, so the french were finally able to sell one of their toys. Isn't it like their 1st sell ever?

And it's not even a final sale. India might be using them as a leverage.

Do you not see something odd about giving hundreds of millions in aid to a nation that has its own space program, from a nation that doesn't?

http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/international-trade-investment-and… Page 23-27. We have a trade deficit with them, and an FDI surplus, loosely meaning we send currency to India, which is used to buy stuff in the UK.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
Since when did AIPAC take over the forums?

Israel is a democracy, but Saudi Arabia controls the world's oil supply. They are both our friends, and only one of them (illegally) controls one of the most effective lobbying organizations ever created.

1) How is AIPAC illegal? Proof please. 2) If there is one country that controls the world's oil supply, it is Iran (see: Strait of Hormuz).

If you are looking at US oil import sources the top source is....Canada. Canada + Mexico were ~3x our imports from Saudi in 9M 2011.1

3) How, exactly, is Saudi Arabia our friend? Desert Storm: "thanks for the help guys, now GTFO", thus spawning OBL. Yeah, real friendly.

1 http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_leve…

 
DaCarez:
1) How is AIPAC illegal? Proof please.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Agents_Registration_Act#Selective_…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Franklin_espionage_scandal

2) If there is one country that controls the world's oil supply, it is Iran (see: Strait of Hormuz).
There are alternatives to Hormuz. It's good policy to be friends with producer nations that don't necessarily hate us.
3) How, exactly, is Saudi Arabia our friend? Desert Storm: "thanks for the help guys, now GTFO", thus spawning OBL. Yeah, real friendly.
They sell us oil. 'Nuff said. We need to become better friends with them.
 
melvvvar:
israel did really well against hezbollah in 2006 didn't it? i remember the footage of the weeping israeli soldiers.

Uh...the body count speaks for itself.

700 Hizbullah KIA, ~50 Lebanese communist party KIA, 2000 Lebanese "civillian" KIA (conservatively, at least 500+ combatants included there),

"When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is." - Oscar Wilde "Seriously, psychology is for those with two x chromosomes." - RagnarDanneskjold
 
EdAziz:
keensetofpeepers:
interesting post.

Tavor rifles suck. worked with them extensively.

I have some hands on experience. explain your beef. the small arms market seems to love them.

Was in the Army. Trained dudes extensively in 3rd world countries who used Tavors. they're OK, not great. difficult to transition from strong side to weak side in CQB, slow mag reload, and bolt slamming and ejection port right next to your cheek, difficult to modify with rail system. host nation guys we worked with only had them because the Israelis unloaded them on the cheap.

 

"Perhaps the utilization of a US airbase abroad might have to occur, with potential for naval conflict. Naval conflict that would no doubt disturb oil transportation, a throwback to Iran’s last major conflict with Iraq."

Azerbaijan. Besides all that natural gas, why do you think the US and Israel are cozying up so nicely with them? They're in Russia and Iran's backyard.

"Let’s not forget how Israel made a daring attack on Saddam’s nuclear facility in 1981. We should assume they are fully prepared to destroy anything they see as a potential nuclear threat."

You can't even compare the two. That was one facility. Iran has dozens, several of which are fortified underground. It would take so much more work to destroy Iran's fabled nuclear "weapons" program than it did to take out Osirak.

The whole only 10% of Iranians support the government thing is pretty stale. The American media has done a good job of pounding into our heads that Iran's cultured middle class is all that matters. They sure make the money, but there are many more poor out there that found common ground with Ahmadinejad's "man of the people message."

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/trilantic-north-america>TNA</a></span>:
Israel isn't going to touch Iran.

and iran isn't going to touch israel either so long as they have 300 nuclear weapons.

this "crisis" is not about israel's survival. it's about demented fantasies of eretz yisroel and removing the final obstacle to israeli expansionism across the entire middle east.

 

bullpups are great in theory since they retain long barrel length in a compact package but if you look at all the great competitive and tactical shooters like Kyle Lamb they still go with the AR design. if you watch them carefully they always hold their rifles with their nondominant hand right behind the barrel. why? to create a longer more stable shooting platform. an AR design will always have more accuracy than bullpups because of this. due to their compactness, it is impossible to recreate the long stable platform on the bullpup.

if you have a catastrophic failure in a bullpup (cartridge explodes in the chamber), it happens right next to your face on a bullpup. on an AR it will happen 6-8 in away. also the ejection port vents hot gas right next to your eyes on a bullpup. very annoying and dangerous in a gunfight.

AR design allows you to reload keeping your eyes on your targets. with a bullpup you often have to take your eyes off the target for a second to insert a fresh mag. also it is easier to change mags in the dark on an AR. it is inherently more awkward to fumble around behind your dominant hand.

anyway, end of bullpup rant. it's a nice CQB rifle but most shooters agree the AR is a better design for general purpose shooting. IMI produces some nice toys. too bad we have to subsidize them.

 
keensetofpeepers:
bullpups are great in theory since they retain long barrel length in a compact package but if you look at all the great competitive and tactical shooters like Kyle Lamb they still go with the AR design. if you watch them carefully they always hold their rifles with their nondominant hand right behind the barrel. why? to create a longer more stable shooting platform. an AR design will always have more accuracy than bullpups because of this. due to their compactness, it is impossible to recreate the long stable platform on the bullpup.

if you have a catastrophic failure in a bullpup (cartridge explodes in the chamber), it happens right next to your face on a bullpup. on an AR it will happen 6-8 in away. also the ejection port vents hot gas right next to your eyes on a bullpup. very annoying and dangerous in a gunfight.

AR design allows you to reload keeping your eyes on your targets. with a bullpup you often have to take your eyes off the target for a second to insert a fresh mag. also it is easier to change mags in the dark on an AR. it is inherently more awkward to fumble around behind your dominant hand.

anyway, end of bullpup rant. it's a nice CQB rifle but most shooters agree the AR is a better design for general purpose shooting. IMI produces some nice toys. too bad we have to subsidize them.

Thank you for the rundown but I'm quite familiar with their ins and outs. I agree.

 

Illum hic consequatur sit rerum voluptas est sequi. Et quasi ea facere qui ea voluptas. Iure dolor omnis necessitatibus non sed impedit. Non iusto et soluta voluptas.

 

Eligendi ab qui neque explicabo quis. Qui aperiam animi nobis molestiae ut. Reprehenderit distinctio eaque ratione repellat pariatur sint dolorem. Dolores accusamus quod aut. Illo repudiandae nihil in occaecati.

Mollitia qui odit consequatur cumque id ut cum. Ut sapiente autem et omnis non minus vel.

Et odit facere et. Quas voluptate qui non molestias sed. Cumque esse est ea culpa tempore.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”