McDonald's: Harder Than Harvard

Good news prospective monkeys! Your prayers have been answered. You do not need to worry about your future. Talks of America's demise have been greatly exaggerated and overblown. Apparently, it is now easier to get into Harvard, than it is to get a job at McDonald's.

Now for all of you linear drones: yes, I am joking, but with tongue firmly planted in cheek. There is something very disturbing in this story that I cannot answer or identify in a single word, sentence or paragraph. Therefore, I would like to play a little game today. I am going to set up this scenario as a simplified case study and see if anyone can come up with an economically or financially viable answer...

Who knows...maybe this one makes it to HBS someday:

Entity X is a multinational corporation. It has served over 99,000,000,000 customers and operates almost everywhere in the world. It has annual sales of
~ $25,000,000,000. The vast majority of its work force is of low income, low education and low skill level. The company recently announced it would hire 50,000 new employees for primarily these sort of positions. All of the employment is to be done in nation U. There are currently 13.5 million unemployed in nation U. 1,000,000 people applied for said positions. 1,000 of said openings were for managerial positions. In order to join the corporation, people must apply for the right.The corporation wound up hiring 62,000 people=6.2% of applicants.

Entity Y is a global phenomenon and is located in nation U, though it attracts customers from all over the world. It charges for its services. Those charges have proven to be insignificant in comparison to the overall value of services rendered. There are roughly 20,000 persons taking advantage of said services at one time across the institution's different levels of operation. In order to take advantage of the institution's services, people must apply for the right. In the most recent round of applications: 29,112 applied with 2,046 being admitted (for an existing 1,655 spots)= 7%.

Now be honest... what does this information tell you about the perceived relative value between the two institutions? Going off the given data alone what sort of extrapolations would you make about the relative value of what said institutions provide? What would it tell you about country's business climate? What would it tell you about the country overall? How would you address the situation based on the information given?

 

Im absolutely POSITIVE its harder to escape Mcdonald's without getting beaten by an angry hood figga than it is to get into Harvard.

Here's the thing. If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, you are the sucker.
 

Apples and Oranges.

One is a product people compete to buy, another is a job people compete to be paid for.

That said, the fact that Harvard has a comparable acceptance rate to McDonald's for a commitment to spending 50k a year for 4 years is quite impressive (for Harvard).

It's pretty sad, however, that nearly a million people didn't make the cut at McDonald's (not through any fault of their own necessarily, simple supply/demand). This country needs to find a way to get the unemployed working again.

 
Tracer:
This country needs to find a way to get the unemployed working again.

The unemployed need to find a way to bring value to an employer...

A good friend will come and bail you out of jail...but a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"
 

I would extrapolate that comparing the re-distribution of GPA points versus income dollars is a more accurate comparison than the above scenario, a comparison based on such imperfect/skewed information.

"Multinational corporation" (i.e. job); "Global phenomenom" (i.e. Justin Bieber? WTF does that even mean?) "Operates everywhere in the world" (i.e. numerous locations); "Located in Nation U" (i.e. one location or one thousand?) "Low education/skill level" (i.e. low entry-barriers); ??? no mention of entry-barriers

 

KEY difference: Turnover, and re-applications.

You pretty much have 1 or 2 shots to go to Harvard, for undergrad, maybe 3 if you try to transfer after your sophomore year.

You can apply to McDonalds as many times as you want.

Also, consider turnover. Harvard turns over its class once a year. People come and go from McDonalds every day.

Last, all people who apply to Harvard take it seriously. How many BS applications do you think McDonalds wades through, probably a lot.

That said, low skilled people, if not of low intelligence, are often not resourceful at the least, and so they just apply to McDonalds because it's such an obvious thing to do.

 

Et cum magni error rerum ut odit deleniti. In magni magni qui. Consequuntur illum voluptas omnis magni deserunt deserunt. Quaerat exercitationem magni harum tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”