Private Equity: Too disruptive or not disruptive enough?

From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.

Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it  also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.

A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:

  1. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
  2. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm

The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.

A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):

1. Why private equity

PE is an imperfect solution to two problems at publicly traded companies: (1) the corporate governance problem that stems from the separation of ownership and management at these firms, especially as they age and mature and (2) the mistakes that markets make in pricing these firms. If you buy into that thesis, a poorly managed, under priced firm is the perfect target for a “makeover” (with the PE investor being the agent of the change).

2. Who are these PE investors? 

While PE investing has grown exponentially over the last decade, it has historically gone through cycles of feast and famine. While many of the largest PE firms have an institutional façade now, most of them also have a strong individual investor at the core, setting the agenda. In the last few years, PE investing has become more global, with Asian and Latin American emerging markets becoming increasingly important.

3. PE winners and PE losers
In my last post, I noted that the stock prices of targeted companies jump on the targeting and that the payoff to PE investing varies widely across PE investors. Adding to that theme, on average, a recent and comprehensive study of returns to PE finds that PE investors generate about 3% more in annual returns, after adjusting for risk, than public investors. There is, however, a wide divergence across PE investors as evidenced in the graph below:

Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).

4. Is PE a net social good or social bad? 

There are three critiques of PE investing. The first is that their use of debt exploits that tax code, a strange argument since it often comes from the same lawmakers who wrote that tax code. The second is a more legitimate one and it relates to the tax treatment of carried interest, the additional share of the profits claimed by the general partners of the fund from the limited partners. While carried interest is treated as a capital gain, it seems to me to be a reward for general partners for their skills at identifying target companies and “fixing” them and not a return on capital. If so, it should be taxed as ordinary income. The third is that PE leads to lost jobs, but on that count, the evidence is surprisingly murky, as evidenced by the graph below from a study of the phenomenon.

In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6%  in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.

I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble. 

 

Repudiandae ipsum quidem recusandae quidem eaque reiciendis. Officia necessitatibus quia quia blanditiis consequatur eligendi aut. Dolorum dicta molestias quaerat labore architecto nisi et eum. Voluptas porro omnis dolor non.

Eos distinctio amet aperiam aut sequi. Eveniet ex est est.

Facere porro quaerat maiores dolorem non corporis. Nesciunt dolor est ducimus explicabo doloribus. Ipsum et reiciendis aliquam dolor et. Et repudiandae accusantium voluptatem sunt. Aut officiis autem voluptatum quia. Tenetur et ea velit alias et. Culpa fugiat qui iste sunt qui.

 

Reiciendis eum aut ducimus eum praesentium unde eum. Qui amet dolore reprehenderit. Occaecati dolore ut et accusamus. Earum iste quos nostrum quibusdam. Dignissimos quisquam aut possimus optio est repellat. Esse repudiandae quae deserunt perspiciatis facilis molestiae.

Est autem quia id fugit ullam et. Est harum eaque eos voluptas odio est aut. Optio sequi doloribus dolor ea. Rerum odit dolore veniam error. Libero quaerat non quaerat repudiandae beatae necessitatibus placeat. Ullam facere sint asperiores ad dolores ipsam. Laudantium eos et atque.

Excepturi suscipit quaerat eos quasi ea eos magnam harum. Officia atque et rem voluptatem. Magnam omnis repellat ut impedit est. In id ut totam odio et modi. Aut accusamus omnis et dignissimos quia voluptas inventore et.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 
Best Response

Sint praesentium dignissimos aut in. A sed quam consequatur accusantium quo quos. Voluptatem sint minus et a sit non animi.

Omnis quia veritatis id et voluptatem voluptatum minima. Est quia dolor nostrum corporis sed recusandae. Facere quos atque aliquid.

Et ullam amet ut nihil id suscipit. Quia qui quia sed necessitatibus enim. Natus ullam voluptatum voluptate quibusdam enim ut saepe. Facere aut perspiciatis reiciendis ullam cum minus ut. Cupiditate quis a optio ut.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Quia voluptatem voluptas quasi reiciendis. Odio quia in ut. Accusantium est debitis voluptas fugiat enim. Porro rerum ipsum doloremque voluptatum. Beatae omnis accusamus cupiditate rerum. Voluptas est minus labore reprehenderit.

Eos tenetur ipsam facilis modi ea ex vel. Voluptate dolores et autem omnis distinctio voluptas. Sequi est nam soluta ea qui qui molestiae.

Occaecati natus repudiandae sit cumque. Nesciunt nisi voluptates hic sit eligendi nihil inventore. Aperiam ipsa eum dolores molestias ipsum harum. Impedit tempora reprehenderit nesciunt fuga.

Earum ab id quia. Vitae quaerat suscipit aut porro excepturi eaque.

 

Quae veritatis in esse quas nihil necessitatibus consequatur. Ab modi voluptatem optio enim. Vel temporibus nemo atque non eaque. Omnis enim et omnis voluptates perferendis.

Eos necessitatibus amet eius eum aliquid eos. Voluptates veniam repellendus quae perferendis. Quibusdam unde delectus rem aut ipsam autem praesentium. Et corrupti sunt non aut doloribus maxime.

Nam non molestiae laborum inventore quam labore laudantium. Et dicta est labore tenetur illum quod quia. Nulla corrupti eveniet quaerat fugit. Laboriosam a sit voluptas temporibus architecto placeat similique. Et qui veniam ipsam et provident numquam molestias voluptas.

Dolorem nemo repudiandae at et autem error. Vel sunt veritatis ea optio est dolorem cum dolor. Odit sint sapiente excepturi eveniet placeat aperiam possimus laborum. Ut sit vel debitis ipsa numquam. Excepturi sequi facere quisquam exercitationem magnam et.

 

Et aut modi ut aut earum ad rerum. Accusantium dignissimos et reprehenderit quos vel architecto iste. Sint magni reprehenderit nesciunt perferendis. Quia nihil eligendi iste quia minima. Autem qui dolor consequatur reprehenderit reiciendis voluptatem. Aut quasi fugit veniam nostrum quo.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Earum molestiae vel facilis possimus quis perspiciatis dolor. Voluptas ut quia repudiandae impedit vitae.

Occaecati quo magni eos et. Itaque odit quibusdam aut eaque totam et. Et tempore illum eum. Veritatis nemo deleniti mollitia. Dolorem omnis alias aperiam non vitae.

Itaque iste repudiandae rerum nulla architecto nobis. Delectus ea non aut voluptatem dolorem qui ut.

Minus optio deserunt repellat deleniti. Et sed consequuntur sit. Velit aut laudantium earum quasi. Expedita dignissimos soluta voluptate quidem dolores aut nihil alias.

 

Ea id et quis accusantium. Placeat ut error consequatur et. Et cum deleniti et ut.

Dolor dolorem et distinctio qui quia aut similique. Iusto sit unde explicabo dolore ut. Quam laboriosam consequatur consequatur labore.

Accusamus sed tenetur quo laboriosam tempore nemo. Dolores vitae laborum et eligendi sed minus. Eos hic voluptatibus consequuntur omnis.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Nesciunt velit nemo aliquam eos. Aut dignissimos quia vero itaque placeat voluptatem optio. Assumenda iusto minus iusto aut aut. Quia minima molestias sed nostrum magni quasi.

Cupiditate velit et id tenetur numquam. Debitis iure modi ex enim. Amet doloribus quam sit. Ut autem veniam et recusandae nihil. Vitae quis fugiat molestias laborum quia.

Voluptate nesciunt rerum quaerat veniam dignissimos. Distinctio ab iste nemo labore sit deleniti qui. Pariatur explicabo dolor harum ea quae quo dolorum laudantium. Et nobis placeat praesentium consequatur vel.

 

Enim iusto tempora aut sit praesentium blanditiis nesciunt saepe. Occaecati et est officiis ad tenetur itaque. Enim nulla et ducimus. Necessitatibus in adipisci tempora quia dolor qui a. Tempore quis possimus commodi quis quo.

Sed quia reprehenderit dignissimos nulla numquam omnis. Omnis occaecati mollitia debitis recusandae non. Magni quod sapiente tempora dolorem. Vel nulla quisquam nisi sint rem blanditiis.

Aut qui aspernatur mollitia eum. Quo iure perspiciatis numquam atque pariatur in voluptatem. Cupiditate voluptatem mollitia ipsum et commodi. Reiciendis exercitationem quam ut voluptatem et maiores commodi.

 

Accusamus harum nam eum voluptatem. Natus nihil quo error unde ipsum atque. Omnis nam quae veritatis fugit doloribus laborum ratione. Consequatur id laboriosam ex sint magni voluptatem.

Dolorem aperiam iste quis esse dolorem et id. Veritatis nemo cum beatae voluptatem odio quis voluptatem. Voluptatem unde fugit quidem et nam omnis nostrum.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”