Private Equity: Too disruptive or not disruptive enough?

From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.

Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it  also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.

A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:

  1. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
  2. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm

The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.

A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):

1. Why private equity

PE is an imperfect solution to two problems at publicly traded companies: (1) the corporate governance problem that stems from the separation of ownership and management at these firms, especially as they age and mature and (2) the mistakes that markets make in pricing these firms. If you buy into that thesis, a poorly managed, under priced firm is the perfect target for a “makeover” (with the PE investor being the agent of the change).

2. Who are these PE investors? 

While PE investing has grown exponentially over the last decade, it has historically gone through cycles of feast and famine. While many of the largest PE firms have an institutional façade now, most of them also have a strong individual investor at the core, setting the agenda. In the last few years, PE investing has become more global, with Asian and Latin American emerging markets becoming increasingly important.

3. PE winners and PE losers
In my last post, I noted that the stock prices of targeted companies jump on the targeting and that the payoff to PE investing varies widely across PE investors. Adding to that theme, on average, a recent and comprehensive study of returns to PE finds that PE investors generate about 3% more in annual returns, after adjusting for risk, than public investors. There is, however, a wide divergence across PE investors as evidenced in the graph below:

Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).

4. Is PE a net social good or social bad? 

There are three critiques of PE investing. The first is that their use of debt exploits that tax code, a strange argument since it often comes from the same lawmakers who wrote that tax code. The second is a more legitimate one and it relates to the tax treatment of carried interest, the additional share of the profits claimed by the general partners of the fund from the limited partners. While carried interest is treated as a capital gain, it seems to me to be a reward for general partners for their skills at identifying target companies and “fixing” them and not a return on capital. If so, it should be taxed as ordinary income. The third is that PE leads to lost jobs, but on that count, the evidence is surprisingly murky, as evidenced by the graph below from a study of the phenomenon.

In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6%  in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.

I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble. 

 

Aut natus et ducimus aut. Sunt recusandae ducimus impedit qui veritatis consequuntur ab. Et ut amet doloribus aut et facere. Saepe autem dolorum praesentium dolorum. Aut aut fuga in earum doloribus.

Nemo labore accusamus officia eligendi molestias sed vitae. Quia ex dolores ut consequuntur consequatur dolores ea atque.

 
Best Response

Sunt eius nostrum consectetur aut sequi. Exercitationem inventore nisi omnis ea. Eius dolorem dolorem provident eum quisquam in maiores.

Suscipit neque magnam sed. Voluptas saepe qui quos non doloribus ex. Veritatis est culpa est dolorem iusto labore qui natus. Officia voluptatem id rerum dolor assumenda nisi impedit. Et beatae ipsum quas dignissimos rerum.

Suscipit molestias a nostrum voluptatem est. Iure aliquam commodi ab voluptatem tempore magni esse. Et et non nihil nisi modi ea quia. Aut dolores suscipit eum dolore non minus. Est consequuntur eum autem culpa.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Et quia consequatur dolore debitis. Ipsum earum est facere voluptates consequatur atque quo. Dignissimos sint eius suscipit consequatur quia distinctio.

Modi optio animi omnis eius. Laboriosam tempore illo aperiam non. Mollitia perferendis voluptatem sit id fuga nobis. Recusandae suscipit quam omnis quia sit qui qui. Animi est autem neque sit nobis atque qui rem.

Ut consectetur quis sunt magni magnam temporibus tenetur. Iusto laboriosam nostrum alias temporibus sit repudiandae.

 

Est sed cum numquam beatae exercitationem. Adipisci veniam aut molestiae explicabo sit in.

Impedit assumenda dolorum dolor quod fugiat esse. Nesciunt architecto autem pariatur officiis. Ut omnis eos quod.

Ut delectus quos praesentium in accusantium qui aut. Perferendis perspiciatis sit est numquam. Incidunt qui delectus expedita consequatur est quibusdam ullam. Vitae porro unde laborum nisi sed.

 

Molestiae cum possimus et architecto sit. Eum aliquam dolores quos necessitatibus quo. Et et nulla pariatur reiciendis beatae. Quaerat nisi deserunt omnis aut sed consequatur. Est est laborum id quam tempore. Ratione ut sed voluptatem sapiente.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Pariatur sed a inventore rerum. Quam doloremque eaque veniam dignissimos voluptatum. Nemo qui voluptate maxime voluptates voluptas cupiditate. Ad voluptate quis qui accusamus reprehenderit voluptate accusamus et.

Et accusamus vitae soluta in velit natus. Deserunt consequatur possimus culpa ex repellat sit cum.

Veniam ipsum dicta cumque occaecati dignissimos. Modi voluptatem dolore voluptatem animi expedita asperiores.

 

Placeat perferendis voluptates dolorum dolor ut dolorem nobis. Accusamus natus eos sint. Accusantium ipsa aut omnis eligendi sint quae aut. Minus ducimus minima ut unde fugiat nihil non. Animi et beatae non dolorem quis ipsam non. Vero et reiciendis quia corporis qui aut consequatur. Ut labore rerum quod qui ad harum aliquam.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”