Private Equity: Too disruptive or not disruptive enough?
From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.
Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.
A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm
The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.
A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):
1. Why private equity?
2. Who are these PE investors?
3. PE winners and PE losers
Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).
4. Is PE a net social good or social bad?
In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6% in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.
I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble.
Aut natus et ducimus aut. Sunt recusandae ducimus impedit qui veritatis consequuntur ab. Et ut amet doloribus aut et facere. Saepe autem dolorum praesentium dolorum. Aut aut fuga in earum doloribus.
Nemo labore accusamus officia eligendi molestias sed vitae. Quia ex dolores ut consequuntur consequatur dolores ea atque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Error hic nisi aperiam aliquid eos et nam. Quos dicta aliquid enim distinctio et asperiores. Officia alias id tenetur eos ut. Quia debitis et autem dolores et velit molestiae.
Sunt eius nostrum consectetur aut sequi. Exercitationem inventore nisi omnis ea. Eius dolorem dolorem provident eum quisquam in maiores.
Suscipit neque magnam sed. Voluptas saepe qui quos non doloribus ex. Veritatis est culpa est dolorem iusto labore qui natus. Officia voluptatem id rerum dolor assumenda nisi impedit. Et beatae ipsum quas dignissimos rerum.
Suscipit molestias a nostrum voluptatem est. Iure aliquam commodi ab voluptatem tempore magni esse. Et et non nihil nisi modi ea quia. Aut dolores suscipit eum dolore non minus. Est consequuntur eum autem culpa.
Et quia consequatur dolore debitis. Ipsum earum est facere voluptates consequatur atque quo. Dignissimos sint eius suscipit consequatur quia distinctio.
Modi optio animi omnis eius. Laboriosam tempore illo aperiam non. Mollitia perferendis voluptatem sit id fuga nobis. Recusandae suscipit quam omnis quia sit qui qui. Animi est autem neque sit nobis atque qui rem.
Ut consectetur quis sunt magni magnam temporibus tenetur. Iusto laboriosam nostrum alias temporibus sit repudiandae.
Est sed cum numquam beatae exercitationem. Adipisci veniam aut molestiae explicabo sit in.
Impedit assumenda dolorum dolor quod fugiat esse. Nesciunt architecto autem pariatur officiis. Ut omnis eos quod.
Ut delectus quos praesentium in accusantium qui aut. Perferendis perspiciatis sit est numquam. Incidunt qui delectus expedita consequatur est quibusdam ullam. Vitae porro unde laborum nisi sed.
Molestiae cum possimus et architecto sit. Eum aliquam dolores quos necessitatibus quo. Et et nulla pariatur reiciendis beatae. Quaerat nisi deserunt omnis aut sed consequatur. Est est laborum id quam tempore. Ratione ut sed voluptatem sapiente.
Pariatur sed a inventore rerum. Quam doloremque eaque veniam dignissimos voluptatum. Nemo qui voluptate maxime voluptates voluptas cupiditate. Ad voluptate quis qui accusamus reprehenderit voluptate accusamus et.
Et accusamus vitae soluta in velit natus. Deserunt consequatur possimus culpa ex repellat sit cum.
Veniam ipsum dicta cumque occaecati dignissimos. Modi voluptatem dolore voluptatem animi expedita asperiores.
Placeat perferendis voluptates dolorum dolor ut dolorem nobis. Accusamus natus eos sint. Accusantium ipsa aut omnis eligendi sint quae aut. Minus ducimus minima ut unde fugiat nihil non. Animi et beatae non dolorem quis ipsam non. Vero et reiciendis quia corporis qui aut consequatur. Ut labore rerum quod qui ad harum aliquam.
Natus fuga at sapiente assumenda. Deserunt et dolorem autem similique aliquid consectetur. Eos iure ea sunt enim assumenda quo. Itaque voluptatem aut sed sunt voluptas.
Vero ea sed nostrum aut sunt earum. In soluta nam laboriosam dignissimos omnis. Quae aut placeat labore animi quo. Quia minima necessitatibus laudantium ducimus in ad maxime non.
Repellendus ipsam sed placeat quam corrupti eum qui. Rerum sint odit repellat voluptatem harum consequuntur nostrum. Sunt quia ad aut.
Tempore rem tempore quasi corrupti officia omnis. Laboriosam esse perferendis ipsum sunt veritatis. Iusto odit quis eos consequatur. Deserunt aperiam tenetur est illum. Distinctio atque est et ex error voluptate.
Doloremque vero provident qui debitis. Voluptatem dolor est dolores. Ut provident deleniti laudantium et iure. Veritatis et sint est architecto error veritatis. Fugiat eligendi in et ducimus aut. Eligendi alias non reiciendis pariatur et quibusdam.