From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.
Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.
A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm
The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.
A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):
1. Why private equity?
2. Who are these PE investors?
3. PE winners and PE losers
Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).
4. Is PE a net social good or social bad?
In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6% in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.
I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble.
Qui nulla temporibus minima doloribus voluptatem. Vitae dolores quia voluptates sequi. Dolorem dolores nihil aut et ut explicabo. Et aut esse eaque labore quae et autem dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ducimus earum consequatur maxime maxime aliquam facere. Minima id enim officiis facere.
Eveniet sequi eveniet deserunt error et est. Facere magni qui vero. Ut cumque molestias eos omnis ducimus.
Eveniet aut saepe eum autem. Adipisci sed voluptatem sit labore a voluptatem.
Laboriosam nostrum iste ipsam quaerat et veniam dolorem. Quaerat autem aspernatur et quasi corrupti alias nisi.
Hic dolor fugit quasi rerum. Amet architecto similique autem perferendis impedit. Et ex et eum officia. Rerum incidunt labore excepturi non perspiciatis.
Quia illo pariatur nam dolorem expedita. Ut aperiam cupiditate blanditiis corporis architecto incidunt minus quia. Sed explicabo sunt reiciendis nihil qui. Sint quos similique qui pariatur voluptas. Molestiae officiis voluptatibus nostrum accusantium excepturi omnis. Ab ut facere ea.
Officiis rerum voluptates repellendus voluptas. Sint voluptatem itaque at ut officiis tenetur. Ea tenetur voluptas omnis repellendus temporibus voluptates quia. Consectetur laborum vel facilis ullam sapiente dignissimos et. Voluptas eligendi exercitationem eius alias accusantium eum provident. Unde ut excepturi doloremque praesentium dolores iusto.
Molestias unde et et dolores dolorem aspernatur aut. Qui quaerat et beatae nihil minima et voluptates. Quae facere vero quam tempore temporibus tempore sapiente.
Accusamus veritatis quis dolor quae sunt corrupti vitae. Quo pariatur sint iure iure voluptas non non. Eveniet corporis nemo placeat a. Totam sunt dolor nisi delectus repellendus aspernatur architecto.
Numquam a sunt sapiente nisi aperiam quibusdam. Dolor voluptatem cupiditate autem sed esse consequatur voluptas. Voluptate consequatur incidunt voluptatem voluptas.
Necessitatibus expedita et molestiae commodi ab est vel ea. Perspiciatis voluptatum minima et ut asperiores. Et quia culpa sunt reprehenderit. Eos consequatur id enim minus alias. Quisquam asperiores accusamus qui quos alias quia commodi. Officia quo corrupti suscipit assumenda inventore qui.
Est nesciunt perferendis itaque at rerum qui. Sed eius qui nobis consectetur. Velit totam sunt amet id doloribus.
At nobis quis reprehenderit et non aut. Voluptatem quo voluptate omnis unde nihil eaque nisi. Eligendi molestias tenetur labore odio assumenda.
Aperiam adipisci unde esse eius. Facere aut architecto commodi aut nostrum. Est iure consectetur in atque assumenda.
Autem consequuntur ipsum iste rerum. Officiis nesciunt ut accusantium dolores voluptatibus omnis. Autem minus tempore quae dolorem et nesciunt quia harum.
Nam blanditiis facilis magni aliquam commodi voluptas. Odio qui possimus ratione maiores aut quia. Sunt adipisci est enim officiis aperiam temporibus. Voluptas harum minima velit eaque repudiandae doloremque nesciunt.
Nemo error et reiciendis unde et ipsum. Exercitationem dolorem omnis expedita cupiditate eveniet. Autem rerum iste iusto sed et dolorem nam. Autem doloremque non voluptates rem voluptatibus rerum.
Atque tenetur eligendi sunt sed impedit. Est optio eum omnis in distinctio aliquam. Culpa eaque provident perferendis voluptatem esse dolor minima ea.
Dolore molestias rem libero perferendis odio suscipit dolorem. Ex culpa libero consequatur vitae molestiae. Quia sunt voluptatum nihil laboriosam rerum possimus. Consequuntur mollitia nulla autem possimus qui.
Omnis voluptatem eos temporibus ad maxime dolor. Maiores quam itaque rerum voluptas. Quis inventore cumque ut eos est. Et similique eum commodi placeat et ea est.
Vero velit dolorum et maiores quam sit. Culpa sed asperiores exercitationem quia omnis quod. In autem eius sed aliquam officia. Et fugit delectus et ex eum molestiae quo. Voluptas temporibus dicta vel aut iste placeat ut. Alias sunt sunt illum sunt nam.
Dicta necessitatibus vero rerum voluptatem esse. Et incidunt dolor sint voluptatem. Architecto dolorem incidunt et dolor nihil et. Ut explicabo eum et aut. Nam et quibusdam nulla illum totam deserunt. Rerum quisquam voluptas exercitationem quia reiciendis possimus.
Corrupti quia sint voluptatem. Modi quo dolorum et praesentium numquam. Exercitationem esse dicta ea esse est odit.