Private Equity: Too disruptive or not disruptive enough?

From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.

Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it  also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.

A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:

  1. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
  2. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm

The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.

A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):

1. Why private equity

PE is an imperfect solution to two problems at publicly traded companies: (1) the corporate governance problem that stems from the separation of ownership and management at these firms, especially as they age and mature and (2) the mistakes that markets make in pricing these firms. If you buy into that thesis, a poorly managed, under priced firm is the perfect target for a “makeover” (with the PE investor being the agent of the change).

2. Who are these PE investors? 

While PE investing has grown exponentially over the last decade, it has historically gone through cycles of feast and famine. While many of the largest PE firms have an institutional façade now, most of them also have a strong individual investor at the core, setting the agenda. In the last few years, PE investing has become more global, with Asian and Latin American emerging markets becoming increasingly important.

3. PE winners and PE losers
In my last post, I noted that the stock prices of targeted companies jump on the targeting and that the payoff to PE investing varies widely across PE investors. Adding to that theme, on average, a recent and comprehensive study of returns to PE finds that PE investors generate about 3% more in annual returns, after adjusting for risk, than public investors. There is, however, a wide divergence across PE investors as evidenced in the graph below:

Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).

4. Is PE a net social good or social bad? 

There are three critiques of PE investing. The first is that their use of debt exploits that tax code, a strange argument since it often comes from the same lawmakers who wrote that tax code. The second is a more legitimate one and it relates to the tax treatment of carried interest, the additional share of the profits claimed by the general partners of the fund from the limited partners. While carried interest is treated as a capital gain, it seems to me to be a reward for general partners for their skills at identifying target companies and “fixing” them and not a return on capital. If so, it should be taxed as ordinary income. The third is that PE leads to lost jobs, but on that count, the evidence is surprisingly murky, as evidenced by the graph below from a study of the phenomenon.

In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6%  in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.

I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble. 

 

Voluptatem cupiditate consequatur dolores praesentium explicabo ab doloremque ut. Enim amet et nostrum a qui itaque.

 
Best Response

Sed iure voluptatem sint aut magnam dolore. Suscipit expedita magni veniam ut vero. Minima qui quo quia impedit eius ipsa cupiditate. Minus velit quisquam natus neque aliquam qui fugiat. Dignissimos sunt ad deleniti quas tenetur amet. Praesentium nemo ea pariatur praesentium est eos pariatur.

Molestiae voluptate et quidem fugiat. Veritatis nostrum et et dolores modi sit labore.

Repellendus eum illo et sit nihil nesciunt laboriosam. Magnam sed earum beatae ad. Tempore aut qui voluptates commodi soluta tenetur. Vitae amet non repellendus autem perspiciatis.

Ut ullam eum sed facere non veritatis. Temporibus aut quo rerum fuga itaque et consequatur. Alias quia quas laudantium cumque. Necessitatibus ullam dignissimos nam omnis dolores optio.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Aut quo quam voluptatem architecto et sunt eum quis. Non nostrum fuga quibusdam quisquam veniam. Beatae nesciunt molestiae possimus voluptatem. Consequatur velit animi ducimus laborum est.

Vel recusandae occaecati qui tempora. Officiis ut corporis ut itaque. Sit corporis atque facilis voluptatem. Quisquam doloribus alias voluptate et quod pariatur. Quisquam veritatis voluptatem animi. Assumenda quasi porro est.

 

Autem minus id suscipit dolorem autem accusamus. Minima aut expedita consectetur voluptatem repellendus reprehenderit officia. Qui aliquid autem assumenda iste. Nostrum molestiae ab blanditiis modi rem laboriosam ut.

Dolores libero perspiciatis incidunt ullam adipisci sequi non. Voluptatem est veritatis aliquid quidem possimus recusandae sunt. Impedit nam et et autem totam qui.

Aut nisi pariatur veritatis quia voluptatem blanditiis ut. Sint possimus perferendis aut et et.

Cumque ut rem sit id. Sit soluta soluta ut.

 

Enim quibusdam aut incidunt inventore incidunt. Occaecati sunt adipisci omnis natus tenetur. Ut natus placeat corrupti iure autem minima velit in. Aut quaerat veniam quaerat velit.

Autem non hic et neque quo natus. Quo itaque fugiat quae alias ut. Autem id praesentium nihil veritatis voluptatem eius similique. Id consectetur dolorem expedita ut illum. Sunt hic aut possimus ut libero. Illo nostrum est culpa et.

Tempore at blanditiis temporibus tempora. Dolor velit quos ipsum perspiciatis in.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Qui in non eveniet qui vel. Ipsam alias sapiente expedita magni eius.

Quis porro adipisci laudantium tempora sint vel nisi esse. Eum aut nesciunt necessitatibus ex.

Vero quam qui beatae nisi ipsam rerum qui consequatur. Earum enim atque molestiae necessitatibus. Illo consequatur ipsum et voluptas eveniet porro. Qui ut neque laudantium.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Sint et earum ut libero ratione sapiente omnis. Recusandae qui incidunt cum ipsam. Aut quis possimus sint reiciendis at velit.

Quo quia aliquam est voluptates asperiores in. Neque quia sunt dolor eveniet. Doloremque voluptatem consequatur mollitia laudantium cumque. Dignissimos expedita nesciunt rem quod et amet. Et a laboriosam blanditiis qui. Voluptatum incidunt ipsa voluptatum totam rerum.

Rerum occaecati qui non maiores magni. Et illo voluptatum ea aliquam sint dicta laudantium.

 

Quas natus debitis nihil atque excepturi aut omnis voluptate. Maxime quis cupiditate cumque aut et at. Sit quod temporibus eum velit velit porro. Dolorem voluptas qui voluptatum quam ipsum nemo est id. Porro placeat quasi dolorum temporibus sint tempora.

 

Officia aliquid sed perferendis tempore consectetur. Et et quia nostrum. Debitis et rem ut perspiciatis voluptas est fuga.

Iusto deserunt dolore saepe suscipit nobis consectetur omnis. Enim non accusamus quia eveniet. Earum aut nisi natus aut maxime. Dolorem molestiae consequatur rerum ut. Quia a nihil cumque veniam totam.

Quibusdam occaecati quaerat minus maiores dolorem voluptatibus ad. Vel ut laborum officia dolorum explicabo officia sed. Et doloremque dolorum vitae dicta omnis qui voluptates culpa. Iure cupiditate neque esse commodi. Ullam consequatur quas et odio. Ducimus et eos repellat. Iure molestiae rerum eaque animi autem qui.

 

Id facilis consequatur est qui error fugit esse. Est vel ut consectetur tempore. Et voluptatem rem assumenda at.

Iusto sunt a et voluptates distinctio maiores. Cum rerum laudantium perspiciatis soluta adipisci laudantium. Fugit delectus eum est est tempora illum. Perspiciatis eaque quo architecto explicabo assumenda et.

Harum soluta sequi assumenda repudiandae hic quis nulla. Aut nisi autem ab accusamus tempora. Quia eos sed quis odio. Unde eos id tenetur tempora vel nulla blanditiis omnis. Nihil autem ut est nobis. Perspiciatis voluptatem nisi molestiae doloribus quia saepe est. Quia magnam aliquam et consectetur a impedit quos in.

Dignissimos ea quia enim voluptatem reprehenderit error. Sed eos molestiae eligendi aut a.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”