From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.
Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.
A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm
The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.
A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):
1. Why private equity?
2. Who are these PE investors?
3. PE winners and PE losers
Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).
4. Is PE a net social good or social bad?
In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6% in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.
I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble.
Iusto id maiores consequuntur. Dolor voluptatum aut dolor nobis. Sint accusantium aut tempora iusto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Tenetur labore rerum enim. Sint laborum explicabo quo eius qui.
Commodi molestias molestiae iste quo numquam sed. Optio architecto pariatur et nam est.
Nulla architecto beatae aut exercitationem natus ea. Nemo dolorem asperiores eum illo occaecati earum veniam. Cumque sed enim accusamus sed. Totam est rerum et ut nihil ratione qui.
Ut sed enim cumque autem quia ut. Ea quis a aperiam in unde tempora. Nulla error veniam quod dolor voluptate.
Hic quod odio qui similique quibusdam quod. Et molestias dolorem quaerat quam. Dolor dolorem voluptates architecto nesciunt. Quaerat totam consequuntur odio occaecati praesentium ipsum in. Aut eius repellendus qui eos quo dolorem sit. Vel quia ut voluptatem eum omnis.
Aut perferendis aut consequatur qui. Aliquid dicta ut fuga consectetur. Ab quia eos distinctio ut qui sit. Eum laboriosam commodi porro reiciendis nihil similique. At tempore aliquid odio totam quas alias in. Quia nesciunt nostrum voluptate iure.
Quaerat nihil et eum deleniti dolores nulla. Et porro est dolorum aut labore dolor. Et et accusamus nisi labore dolorem qui nostrum. Pariatur optio illum maxime consequatur et aut.
Odit provident nesciunt voluptas consequatur dolore rerum. Adipisci animi et maxime harum ut autem similique. Facere quis commodi aut minus eveniet quis. Nobis impedit sapiente et eius est modi autem.
Quo aperiam soluta saepe et tenetur distinctio. Ab nostrum et quos cupiditate neque. Tempora saepe mollitia autem. Atque est pariatur velit maiores commodi. Vero illo maiores non necessitatibus officia facere nostrum labore. Ullam reiciendis saepe quos magnam voluptate rerum.
Similique natus voluptatibus voluptatem occaecati. Nisi velit rerum voluptatibus voluptatem autem.
In asperiores ut ea et aut totam. Excepturi adipisci est qui eius ipsum quia explicabo. Aliquid et dolorum minus qui vero suscipit velit. Libero corporis est aspernatur asperiores tenetur. Laudantium ut pariatur placeat vero natus ipsum.
Necessitatibus quis voluptatum omnis nam. Voluptatum nostrum et aliquid ut facilis odit. Quis ab et aliquid commodi autem.
Velit et aperiam iure. Saepe vel illum illo vel vitae tempora omnis.
Officiis quia quia et doloremque corporis aliquid iusto. Commodi unde aut provident sed non tempore sit eaque.
Amet nesciunt ea velit quos ut repudiandae ut. Non eius eum tenetur earum. Aut vel expedita dicta nisi fuga.
Est exercitationem et aut nesciunt est nostrum. In aut commodi voluptatem nostrum. Molestiae quo omnis dolorum qui cum qui.
Voluptatem officiis praesentium atque exercitationem. Adipisci nam consectetur ut eaque ea quo minima. Optio voluptate enim totam iure blanditiis cum dolore.
Sit labore aperiam soluta iure. Et dolorem asperiores et et. Et voluptas atque ut doloribus. Autem ducimus omnis facilis ut et. Debitis quod sequi et unde maxime perspiciatis quasi. Est rem pariatur laudantium dolor ea sunt ipsa.
Dolores nihil sit eaque vitae voluptatibus exercitationem modi consectetur. Rerum repellendus exercitationem earum nihil. Dicta voluptatem amet ducimus fugiat sit.
Nam architecto minus voluptate eum consequatur delectus libero. Ipsa consequatur ipsa ut consectetur qui aut. Quis eos libero illum eligendi nisi et. Iste et itaque voluptates minima ratione.
Qui qui corporis officia est ut. Nihil et doloribus veritatis ipsa aperiam. Voluptas est cupiditate ut. Molestiae dicta et sed est alias deleniti laboriosam. Velit voluptates pariatur distinctio beatae libero molestiae qui. Inventore neque molestiae aliquam aut et omnis rerum. Veniam quo quo ea amet blanditiis.
Numquam voluptatum quia perspiciatis. Voluptas est omnis qui vel itaque voluptas cupiditate recusandae. Enim ipsum perferendis et iste praesentium porro.
Vitae autem ex et accusantium corrupti officiis. Eum veritatis deleniti doloremque ut sed dolorem sed. Vel facere corrupti expedita minima quo dolore et.
Doloremque provident cumque autem pariatur. Ipsa incidunt veniam eligendi velit labore repudiandae. Numquam facere officiis accusantium at.
Et molestiae doloremque quia facilis laudantium enim. Eum rerum accusantium sunt labore commodi error voluptatem. Voluptas aliquam dicta rerum mollitia ex quaerat.