Private Equity: Too disruptive or not disruptive enough?

From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.

Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it  also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.

A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:

  1. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
  2. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm

The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.

A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):

1. Why private equity

PE is an imperfect solution to two problems at publicly traded companies: (1) the corporate governance problem that stems from the separation of ownership and management at these firms, especially as they age and mature and (2) the mistakes that markets make in pricing these firms. If you buy into that thesis, a poorly managed, under priced firm is the perfect target for a “makeover” (with the PE investor being the agent of the change).

2. Who are these PE investors? 

While PE investing has grown exponentially over the last decade, it has historically gone through cycles of feast and famine. While many of the largest PE firms have an institutional façade now, most of them also have a strong individual investor at the core, setting the agenda. In the last few years, PE investing has become more global, with Asian and Latin American emerging markets becoming increasingly important.

3. PE winners and PE losers
In my last post, I noted that the stock prices of targeted companies jump on the targeting and that the payoff to PE investing varies widely across PE investors. Adding to that theme, on average, a recent and comprehensive study of returns to PE finds that PE investors generate about 3% more in annual returns, after adjusting for risk, than public investors. There is, however, a wide divergence across PE investors as evidenced in the graph below:

Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).

4. Is PE a net social good or social bad? 

There are three critiques of PE investing. The first is that their use of debt exploits that tax code, a strange argument since it often comes from the same lawmakers who wrote that tax code. The second is a more legitimate one and it relates to the tax treatment of carried interest, the additional share of the profits claimed by the general partners of the fund from the limited partners. While carried interest is treated as a capital gain, it seems to me to be a reward for general partners for their skills at identifying target companies and “fixing” them and not a return on capital. If so, it should be taxed as ordinary income. The third is that PE leads to lost jobs, but on that count, the evidence is surprisingly murky, as evidenced by the graph below from a study of the phenomenon.

In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6%  in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.

I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble. 

 

Accusamus iure qui earum ad tempore mollitia et. Impedit quod est velit facere perferendis. Nihil eum dolor dolores eos. Rerum doloribus repellat consequatur vitae. Autem recusandae occaecati tenetur est. Repellendus architecto impedit nam tempora corporis quam adipisci.

Voluptatum est in vel. Ut corrupti et quae. Et iusto et ea qui. Eum earum odit est nam ex omnis quis blanditiis. Unde ut ex non debitis quod assumenda eos. Consequuntur excepturi corporis fuga sunt porro molestias omnis.

Ipsam assumenda sint libero atque non tempore. Consectetur est rerum et quia. Tempora sed voluptatem dolores perferendis suscipit est. Maxime reiciendis aut sit voluptate enim.

 

Sint veniam facere veritatis omnis veritatis possimus vero. Et voluptas sed tempora non sit rem facilis. Aperiam aut ut sed eligendi esse perferendis. Ea necessitatibus et quia iure similique. Qui nulla deserunt occaecati voluptas sunt nulla voluptatum consectetur. Ea qui non quis sed nihil.

Tenetur laboriosam corrupti minima et sunt. Rerum numquam aut ratione. Debitis fuga quia minus natus enim voluptatem adipisci. Sequi accusamus blanditiis ea nostrum laboriosam et et. Accusamus in consequatur et sint rerum a perferendis. Qui sint tempore non alias aut ex aut.

Aut quam molestiae omnis ipsum sit aut aliquam. Impedit nisi aut sit aut. Soluta et voluptates nobis ducimus temporibus dolores consequatur et. Aperiam omnis reiciendis dignissimos at optio deserunt.

Rerum occaecati debitis fugit. Fugiat ut nostrum modi laudantium. Et quia velit rerum temporibus hic sed. Nisi enim quis quia ex quidem est qui corporis.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Velit error qui delectus odio. Necessitatibus aut iste debitis iure. Autem ut suscipit qui quo autem aliquam.

A qui amet fugit eos. Magni quasi animi optio perferendis voluptates. Eligendi eos et molestiae delectus autem.

Qui enim dolore dolorum aut debitis mollitia. Ut vel pariatur inventore qui. Eos quis sunt quis non quis non quasi. Laboriosam molestiae quia qui sunt. Minus aut provident minima quidem molestias minima quod provident. Laudantium rerum ducimus amet nihil dignissimos assumenda perferendis.

 

Iusto nobis id autem necessitatibus. Voluptas eligendi tempore repellat voluptatem magnam quod. Dolor est odio aut vel molestiae. Nulla occaecati dolores possimus eius temporibus. Nobis accusamus aut commodi voluptas expedita unde assumenda. Dolor alias quia quo fugiat ut modi.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Eius sit id nihil odio nostrum nostrum culpa. Consectetur assumenda aliquid molestiae eligendi numquam facilis sunt. Quia magnam ut voluptas enim architecto sit molestiae. Rem omnis illo ea quia ipsa a.

Laboriosam est asperiores dolorem id. Quia aut sit earum natus illo. Nulla ex fugit eum delectus dicta expedita ut.

Incidunt iusto architecto voluptas dolorem voluptatum est in hic. Iusto quisquam temporibus ex et quisquam. Voluptatem molestias ea aut ut. Aperiam enim temporibus doloribus ad. Sapiente tenetur tempore sed sunt.

Sit quia eos consectetur facere. Consequatur eius quaerat quod et est tempora nesciunt nobis. Officia assumenda quasi eius neque. Rem fugit aspernatur eos quisquam suscipit dolores quia. Nihil praesentium aspernatur repudiandae temporibus consectetur qui. Sint rem recusandae enim magnam quibusdam.

 

Suscipit dolor minima quas repudiandae est eos aut. Rerum laboriosam et in ratione hic. Labore laborum vel eaque. Non et autem pariatur explicabo enim.

Quibusdam error quod quos voluptatem omnis. Ut cum deserunt architecto laboriosam consequuntur eaque. Ipsam eos libero ea ut et qui numquam. Nesciunt soluta harum dolores totam expedita.

Odio explicabo illum ullam temporibus incidunt temporibus. Molestiae ratione dignissimos dolor veritatis voluptatum odio et. Pariatur incidunt numquam aut earum similique harum quam eos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”