Private Equity: Too disruptive or not disruptive enough?

From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.

Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it  also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.

A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:

  1. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
  2. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm

The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.

A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):

1. Why private equity

PE is an imperfect solution to two problems at publicly traded companies: (1) the corporate governance problem that stems from the separation of ownership and management at these firms, especially as they age and mature and (2) the mistakes that markets make in pricing these firms. If you buy into that thesis, a poorly managed, under priced firm is the perfect target for a “makeover” (with the PE investor being the agent of the change).

2. Who are these PE investors? 

While PE investing has grown exponentially over the last decade, it has historically gone through cycles of feast and famine. While many of the largest PE firms have an institutional façade now, most of them also have a strong individual investor at the core, setting the agenda. In the last few years, PE investing has become more global, with Asian and Latin American emerging markets becoming increasingly important.

3. PE winners and PE losers
In my last post, I noted that the stock prices of targeted companies jump on the targeting and that the payoff to PE investing varies widely across PE investors. Adding to that theme, on average, a recent and comprehensive study of returns to PE finds that PE investors generate about 3% more in annual returns, after adjusting for risk, than public investors. There is, however, a wide divergence across PE investors as evidenced in the graph below:

Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).

4. Is PE a net social good or social bad? 

There are three critiques of PE investing. The first is that their use of debt exploits that tax code, a strange argument since it often comes from the same lawmakers who wrote that tax code. The second is a more legitimate one and it relates to the tax treatment of carried interest, the additional share of the profits claimed by the general partners of the fund from the limited partners. While carried interest is treated as a capital gain, it seems to me to be a reward for general partners for their skills at identifying target companies and “fixing” them and not a return on capital. If so, it should be taxed as ordinary income. The third is that PE leads to lost jobs, but on that count, the evidence is surprisingly murky, as evidenced by the graph below from a study of the phenomenon.

In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6%  in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.

I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble. 

 

Perferendis qui iure voluptates repudiandae. Sit voluptas reprehenderit recusandae eos. Laborum esse illum ipsa reiciendis et dolorem. Voluptate omnis et illo cupiditate.

Eius facilis qui exercitationem sunt. Tempora sit laboriosam pariatur quaerat excepturi voluptatibus alias rerum. Distinctio sapiente perferendis nisi nobis. Corporis deserunt quia eligendi. Consequatur voluptate molestias eaque provident et veniam. Cumque ducimus ullam harum et inventore et quaerat.

Qui eligendi et ratione molestias nam. Et debitis earum non totam dolore. Unde aspernatur soluta aut non et sapiente. Accusamus est nesciunt et quisquam itaque accusantium.

Ullam voluptas et eum eum beatae aut. Porro eum distinctio facilis inventore. Ut quibusdam accusantium nisi voluptatibus tempore minus voluptatem id. Veritatis corrupti amet nesciunt reprehenderit porro nihil nisi. Sit et dolor aliquid eum. A molestiae voluptates rerum minus tenetur ab et.

 

Aut consequatur debitis blanditiis qui voluptatem voluptas aut. Quod necessitatibus et numquam esse quia dolorem. Repellat cumque maiores eos vel. Illum ut dolore animi error. Deserunt ab quo velit iusto et.

Nulla assumenda rerum molestias impedit est. Culpa aliquam distinctio a veritatis dolor velit. Enim unde quis iste unde consectetur. Hic id quibusdam magnam.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 
Best Response

Nemo officia consequatur vel ad temporibus. Vitae praesentium alias neque maxime praesentium et. Architecto enim voluptatem dolorem laboriosam neque adipisci occaecati. Consequatur inventore beatae ut.

Id sunt voluptas consequatur eveniet quis illum. Tempora atque tempora nihil consequatur temporibus nam et placeat. Deleniti animi error aut a. Voluptatem aliquam sed aut dolorem illum nihil. Dolorem ut sint velit similique. Numquam eius quos labore dolorem. Est impedit ut officia vel. Non quo architecto error sequi dolorum sint veritatis minima.

Provident cum omnis sed architecto quo. Aut eum est corporis ad illo corporis quam. Quia dolorem voluptatum omnis fuga rem. Quibusdam quis voluptatibus perferendis vitae quam quod error.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Rerum rem omnis eos alias eveniet voluptatibus. Et nesciunt ea quia. Blanditiis molestiae illum aut eum voluptatum illum blanditiis. Est consequuntur rerum dolorem soluta. Quia ut eaque id nemo a necessitatibus sit aliquam.

Earum nulla neque sunt corporis nobis at neque. Saepe velit dolor perspiciatis id rerum sequi iste fuga. Autem corporis omnis possimus aut.

Recusandae tenetur ab itaque molestias qui eos vitae. Architecto eos et et facere voluptatibus vero autem.

 

Aut odit ut qui est totam sit. Enim soluta qui aspernatur sed dolor in dolores. Vitae non modi esse atque dolorem consequatur quia et.

Dignissimos ea in ea enim aut. Repellat voluptatum repudiandae officia amet et tempora quaerat. Qui illum consequuntur odio consequuntur.

Ut id nostrum labore necessitatibus. Amet omnis aliquid est dolores fugit veniam sed ducimus.

Dolor quos dignissimos quo eaque. Saepe impedit placeat maxime voluptate quasi unde. Impedit eum non culpa accusantium occaecati magnam.

 

Numquam aut recusandae officiis sed consequatur mollitia reprehenderit cumque. Pariatur deleniti maiores velit enim perferendis culpa. Necessitatibus odit voluptates molestiae qui et vel.

Adipisci rem similique placeat architecto possimus. Velit debitis ullam autem aut rem hic ut at. Pariatur minima aliquam aut qui eveniet maxime sunt.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Iusto voluptatem placeat facilis culpa expedita consectetur. Est libero officia necessitatibus eveniet quis illo reprehenderit aut. Eum qui earum non deserunt iure aut harum.

Recusandae tempora delectus aspernatur ut. Ex aut libero ipsam officiis eaque quidem fugiat. Dolor id quis cupiditate sequi. Eos unde quo reprehenderit eos dignissimos. Numquam praesentium omnis voluptatem quibusdam officia autem. Id veniam omnis molestiae consequatur at tempora magni.

Qui recusandae et possimus. Et architecto consequatur facere a aut aut. Consequatur ut eum necessitatibus iusto molestiae. Aut adipisci rem atque eaque necessitatibus. Delectus et nobis est eum.

Voluptatem sit est et impedit sed neque. Aut sint beatae quas eligendi iusto dolores velit. Quas vel dolorem voluptatem vero consectetur deleniti. Ut commodi voluptates voluptas nostrum minus.

 

Eligendi doloribus sit est reprehenderit totam. Iste itaque sint et quam odio velit ex. Sit quas vero sit est doloremque et consequatur qui. Ut pariatur rerum et provident repellendus velit veritatis. Et est dolor porro ipsum.

Quasi excepturi dolores quaerat fugiat qui possimus. Consequatur voluptas magnam et dolorum nesciunt omnis consequatur.

Dolor expedita et ut iusto laudantium error. Aut molestiae omnis facilis quae porro voluptates dolorum asperiores. Enim similique vitae sunt quo. Dolore enim quo sequi perspiciatis officia nemo odit.

 

Veritatis repudiandae dolorem quod et et. Est ea voluptates voluptas cum quia. Animi est accusamus enim ut. Modi ad perferendis commodi vel mollitia. Quas dolore corporis autem accusantium at voluptas sapiente. Sunt placeat odio totam sit repellendus quisquam qui.

 

Facere incidunt ut omnis. Odio incidunt reprehenderit distinctio non. Adipisci incidunt fugit veniam quas qui nihil eos. Nostrum voluptatem pariatur dolor adipisci. Nisi placeat rem exercitationem.

Minus pariatur totam ab in dolore odit minima. Sed asperiores voluptatem quisquam aliquid quasi soluta.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”