Reading the Fine Print: How ArcelorMittal burned their Hybrid Investors
It’s been a while since I posted, so I figure I would post a story about ArcerlorMittal and their Hybrid security.
For those monkeys who don’t know a Hybrid security is, its a security that works and looks like a bond (usually a perpetual bond), but for accounting purposes it counts (partially or in full) as equity.
ArcelorMittal had an outstanding High Yield Hybrid bond that was perpetual and had a coupon of 8.75%. This particular security was very attractive for investors due to its floating reset after its first call, which was in 2018.
Before January 20, this bond was trading in the 108-110 range. However, this bond had a very important caveat: A Rating Agency Event.
Hidden in Page 51 of the prospectus of this security, There is a short explanation of what a Rating Agency Event is. Basically, if one of the rating agencies (Moody’s, Fitch, S&P) changes the way they apply equity treatment to the hybrid, Arcelor has the right to call the security at 101.
After 2010, many newly issued Hybrid bonds have this language in their prospectus, so it’s not exactly a secret. However until last week, no one ever thought that it would come to play. Let me explain:
Last July, Moody’s revised the way their where going to treat the equity capital component of Hybrids. Basically, Hybrids of High Yield issuers would get 0 equity capital treatment. Back when this was announced, a couple of bonds dipped in price, but all issuers, like ArcelorMittal, did not announce early redemption. People suddenly forgot, or were confident that issuers would not apply this caveat, and HY hybrids traded higher and higher towards the end of the year.
On January 20, Arcelor decided out of the blue to call this bond at 101. The bond’s bid that day was 108.50. Every bond holder of the $650m issue instantly lost ~7.50%.
Since then, the Hybrid market has been rattled. Hybrids traded down (The risk-off sentiment of the past week helped push the prices down) and other issuers have taken the advantage to use the caveat to call their own hybrids (albeit the bonds were trading closer to the 101 call). What’s funny is that NO ONE was expecting this to happen.
I managed to get a hold of research from 3 big investment banks that have top ranked European Credit analysts. All have recent reports saying that the chances of the Ratings Agency Event being applied was close to 0. One of the reports was even from January 15!
So what did I learn from this:
1. It is important to read the prospectus, especially if you are investing in complicated structures like a Hybrid High Yield Bond (and trust me, 99% of investors don’t get past the cover page [IMO])
2. Sometimes, companies will make the decision to burn their investors, even if it only makes the slight economic/accounting sense
3. Even the smartest minds on Wall Street will not get it right, even if the message is right in front of their faces. I am sure there were many analysts in Europe that got their ear ripped off by their investors
4. Change in regulation/Change in methodologies by Rating Agencies can seriously affect entire asset classes
5. ArcelorMittal will have a hard time issuing a Hybrid at a cheap price (Or, the market will forget again and Arcelor will win again!)
For those of you who want to learn more, start here:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/83a8c6a6-82b8-11e3-9d7e-00144feab7de.html
Luckily it was only 7.50% loss, but those investors have learned their lesson now. I don't know if your aware of the whole Equity Inns preferred situation with Goldman Sachs. Similar situation with filings, but investors lost way more.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324049504578541603072663338
thanks for the write
Nice wrap up of the affair. +1 SB.
So, both the issuer and issue ratings remained unchanged since summer ?
They may not have even changed the ratings at all, even in summer. Simply a change in the methodology used by the ratings agencies to determine their ratings could trigger the call option, even if the rating stays the same.
Something similar to this happened to a lot of hybrids with Dodd-Frank, where a regulatory change suddenly makes them callable or triggers some random provision buried in the prospectus that most people never even consider.
The bonds dropped 7 points on August 1st, I think the market did react a bit to this when it first happened...
Quaerat dolor eius autem dolorum laboriosam tenetur. Non quod aut quam placeat sed veritatis. Impedit aut qui molestias quia assumenda. Et dolor exercitationem quam autem. Ipsa nihil dicta autem sapiente. Asperiores illum facere expedita occaecati velit ratione perferendis.
Quaerat aspernatur necessitatibus id sit commodi necessitatibus eius. Enim perspiciatis quia qui dolores. Libero sit voluptatem et. Voluptatem laboriosam explicabo rerum non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...