The Aging of the Tech Sector: The Pricing Divergence of Young and Old Tech Companies
As the NASDAQ approaches historic highs, Apple’s market cap exceeds that of the Bovespa (the Brazilian equity index) and young social media companies like Snapchat have nosebleed valuations, there is talk of a tech bubble again. It is human nature to group or classify individuals or entities and assign common characteristics to the group and we tend to do the same, when investing. Specifically, we categorize stocks into sectors or groups and assume that many or most stocks in each group share commonalities. Thus, we assume that utility stocks have little growth and pay large dividends and commodity and cyclical stocks have volatile earnings largely because of macroeconomic factors. With “tech” stocks, the common characteristics that come to mind for many investors are high growth, high risk and low cash payout. While that would have been true for the typical tech stock in the 1980s, is it still true? More specifically, what does the typical tech company look like, how is it priced and is its pricing put it in a bubble? As I hope to argue in the section below, the answers depend upon which segment of the tech sector you look at.
A Short History of Tech Stocks
Market Capitalization at the end of each year (S&P Capital IQ) |
There are two things to note in this graph.
- The first is that technology as a percentage of the market has remained stable since 2009, which calls into question the notion that technology stocks have powered the bull market of the last five years.
- The second is that technology is now the largest single slice of the equity market in the United States and close to the second largest in the global market. So what? Just as growth becomes more difficult for a company as it gets larger and becomes a larger part of the economy, technology collectively is running into a scaling problem, where its growth rate is converging on the growth rate for the economy. While this convergence is sometimes obscured by the focus on earnings per share growth, the growth rate in revenues at technology companies collectively has been moving towards the growth rate of the economy.
The Diversity of Technology
Age: Number of years from founding of company to 2015 |
Note that 341 technology companies have been in existence for more than 35 years and an additional 427 firms have been in existence between 25 and 35 years, and they collectively comprise about 41% of the firms that we had founding years available in the database. While being in existence more than 25 years may sound unexceptional, given that there are manufacturing and consumer product companies that have been around a century or longer, tech companies age in dog years, as the life cycles tend to be more intense and compressed. Put differently, IBM may not be as old as Coca Cola in calendar time but it is a corporate Methuselah, in tech years.
The Pricing of Technology
Pricing as of February 2015, Trailing 12 month values for earnings and book value |
To adjust for the fact that cash holdings at some companies are substantial, I computed a non-cash PE, by netting cash out of the market capitalization and the income from cash holdings from the net income. While it is true that the youngest tech companies look highly priced, the pricing becomes more reasonable, as you look across the age scale. For instance, while the youngest companies in the tech sector trade at 4.34 times revenues (based upon enterprise value), the oldest companies trade at 2.44 times revenues.
Based on February 2015 Pricing & Trailing 12 month numbers: 2807 US technology and 6076 non-technology companies. |
The assessment depends upon what part of the technology sector you are focused on. While the youngest tech companies trade at much higher multiples of revenues, earnings and book value than the rest of the market, the oldest tech companies actually look under priced (rather than over priced) relative to both the rest of the market and to the oldest non-tech companies. In fact, even focusing just on the youngest companies, it is interesting that while young tech companies trade at higher multiples of earnings (EBITDA, for instance) than young non-tech companies, the difference is negligible if you add back R&D, an expense that accountants mis-categorize as an operating expense.
Does this mean that you should be selling your young tech companies and buying old tech companies? I am not quite ready to make that leap yet, because the differences in these pricing multiples can be partially or fully explained by differences in fundamentals, i.e., young tech companies may be highly priced because they have high growth and old tech companies may trade at lower multiples because they have more risk and tech companies collectively may differ fundamentally from non-tech companies.
There are three key fundamentals that determine value: the cash flows that you generate from your existing assets, the value generated by expected growth in these cash flows and the risk in these cash flows. Again, rather than look at tech stocks collectively, I will break them down by age and compare them to non-tech stocks.
a. Cash Flows and Profitability
b. Growth – Level and Quality
c. Risk – Financial and Market
d. Cash Return – Dividends, Buybacks and FCFE
FCFE = Cash left over after taxes, debt payments and reinvestment; Firm value = Market Cap + Total Debt; Cash Return = Dividends + Buybacks - Stock Issues |
Note that both young tech and young non-tech companies have raised more new equity than they return in the form of dividends and buybacks, giving them a negative cash return yield. Old tech companies return more cash to stockholders both in dividends and collectively, with buybacks, than old non-tech companies. Finally, notwithstanding the attention paid to Apple's cash balance, old tech companies hold less cash than old non-tech companies do.
In summary, here is what the numbers are saying. Young technology companies are less profitable, have higher growth, higher price risk and are priced more richly than the young non-tech companies. Old technology companies are more profitable, have less top line growth and are priced more reasonably than old non-tech companies.
The size of the technology sector and the diversity of companies in the sector makes it difficult to categorize the entire sector. In my view, the data suggests that we should be doing the following:
- Truth in labeling: We are far too casual in our classifications of companies as being in technology. In my book, Tesla is an automobile company, Uber is a car service (or transportation) company and The Lending Club is a financial services company, and none of them should be categorized as technology companies. The fact that these firms use technology innovatively or to their advantage cannot be used as justification for treating them as technology companies, since technology is now part and parcel of even the most mundane businesses. Both companies and investors are complicit in this loose labeling, companies because they like the “technology” label, since it seems to release them from the obligation of explaining how much they need to invest to scale up, and investors, because it allows them to pay multiples of revenues or earnings that would be difficult (if not impossible) to justify in the actual businesses that these firms are in.
- Age classes: We should start classifying technology companies by age, perhaps in four groups: baby tech (start up), young tech (product/service generating revenues but not profits), middle-aged tech (profits generated on significant revenues) and old tech (low top line growth, though sometimes accompanied by high profitability), without any negative connotations to any of these groupings. If we want to point to mispricing, we should be specific about which group the mispricing is occurring. In this market, for instance, if there is a finger to be pointed towards a group, it is not technology collectively that looks like it is richly priced, but baby and young technology companies. By the same token, if you follow rigid value investing advice, where you are told to stay away from technology on the grounds that it is high growth, high risk and highly priced, that may have been solid advice in 1985 but you will be missing your best “value” opportunities, if you follow it now.
- Youth or Sector: When we think of start-ups and young firms, we tend to assume that they are technology-based and that presumption, for the most part, is backed up by the numbers. However, there are start-ups in other businesses as well, and it is worth examining when mispricing occurs, whether it is sector or age-driven. It is true that young social media companies have gone public to rapturous responses over the last few years but Shake Shack, which is definitely not a technology company (unless you can have a virtual burger and an online shake) also saw its stock price double on its offering day and biotechnology companies had their moment in the limelight in 2014, as well.
- Life Cycle dynamics: I have talked about the corporate life cycles in prior posts and as I have noted in this one, there is evidence that the life cycle for a technology company may be both shorter and more intense than the life cycle for a non-technology company. That has implications for how we value and price these companies. In valuation, we may have to revisit the assumptions we make about long lives (perpetual) and positive growth that we routinely attach in discounted cash flow models to arrive at terminal value, when valuing technology companies, and perhaps replace them with finite period, negative growth terminal value models for fading technologies. In pricing, we should expect to see a much quicker drop off in the multiples of earnings that we are willing to pay, as tech companies age, relative to non-tech companies. I will save that for a future post.
Sit ullam quae consectetur ut quia est quaerat. Illo id dolores accusamus perferendis at laborum possimus. Quidem quidem molestias nemo. Molestias dolores et doloribus et tempora.
Et nihil qui cupiditate perspiciatis. Laboriosam adipisci ut molestias sunt ratione est accusantium. Architecto ut nisi delectus velit enim a aut.
Aut molestiae quo itaque harum dolores et. Ratione aliquam sit provident omnis pariatur. Omnis aut non nam occaecati necessitatibus. Similique ut veritatis similique placeat aut quo. Animi quae voluptatem voluptas similique.
Nemo quia quia ad consequatur doloremque itaque. Cumque id dolorem enim enim voluptas nesciunt temporibus eos. Aliquam ut ut eaque voluptatum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Molestias reiciendis perferendis iure eum et earum labore molestiae. Voluptas dolores voluptates voluptatem sit consectetur. Consequatur minus molestiae sunt. Ut et consequatur similique tenetur. Consequatur qui aspernatur expedita doloribus autem quis.
Repudiandae blanditiis ullam dolores ut. Magnam aperiam culpa nemo quasi fugiat mollitia facilis suscipit. Id ab voluptatem omnis. Aliquam rem nulla est dicta adipisci reiciendis.
Non cupiditate natus reprehenderit deserunt rerum. Voluptatem delectus id voluptatibus nulla earum alias. Qui laudantium ab ea ducimus quae aspernatur. Deserunt sint distinctio nostrum quidem dicta. Ut delectus numquam dolore molestiae rerum qui.
Sit voluptatum ut dolorem et temporibus. Accusantium dolores minus vel nostrum sunt sunt occaecati est. Eum laborum accusamus eum amet harum fuga voluptatem. Molestias quod earum natus id dolores qui quos.
Aspernatur vero autem quod dolor aperiam quia. Sed quisquam et ipsum inventore. Sit quidem omnis ipsa rerum quis qui laboriosam aut.
Nam sint tempore et et quisquam illo facilis. Quo aut aut praesentium eos quia animi expedita placeat. Odio quo assumenda reiciendis nobis nobis deserunt rerum enim. Et vel ut sint magnam unde.
Eius velit maxime harum atque accusamus excepturi. Commodi cum a eos laudantium repellat ratione. Autem voluptatem atque et sint. Tenetur aut est laudantium harum veniam. Dolorem soluta vel natus blanditiis fugiat.
Fuga voluptates deserunt dolorem reprehenderit quae enim. In quis voluptatem qui quia nesciunt. Consequatur et minus sint ut. Sapiente autem quasi sunt magni illo. Architecto voluptatem reiciendis dolor iusto deleniti.
Consequuntur quaerat sed eos quasi. Recusandae placeat illum nihil quia. Deserunt iure corrupti velit occaecati expedita ipsam. Veniam nostrum et non et nam aut consequuntur. Sint tempora ad similique.
Molestiae labore ab tenetur repudiandae. Aut quod voluptatibus odio est. In ut beatae reprehenderit incidunt voluptatum non doloremque. Est molestiae ut placeat quia similique necessitatibus eius.
Itaque et vitae dolores delectus. Voluptate et et fugit explicabo.
Maiores consequatur rerum nisi nihil. Ipsum quaerat quaerat minus quasi at ut. Et tempore ab omnis perferendis quasi doloribus repellat dignissimos. Ratione velit provident autem omnis ab.
Tempore pariatur perferendis nemo quia sint incidunt et corrupti. Sunt dolorem alias harum quo et. Dolorum cum omnis nostrum quis totam maxime. Aliquam id veniam necessitatibus dicta. Consequatur et eveniet earum excepturi aliquid inventore eum. Et iure voluptatibus deserunt molestias ipsa quaerat expedita.
Animi sit qui cumque optio cum. Unde officia eum necessitatibus id. Eos cum consequatur molestiae et.
Sed repudiandae eum qui nobis. Cumque sint distinctio repudiandae voluptatem. Voluptatem qui fugit aliquam quis rerum. Illo cumque dolores autem doloremque unde. Laborum eveniet autem incidunt et. Dolores placeat ullam consectetur dolores est.
Doloremque consequatur similique soluta omnis ut. Repellat accusantium repellendus nihil minima aut in. Corporis ea culpa omnis facere qui atque quia error.
Veniam qui praesentium odio nam corporis occaecati blanditiis. Tenetur sit hic reprehenderit placeat ratione enim porro. A molestiae quasi et omnis. Voluptatem asperiores unde vero ex veniam veritatis maiores. Magni dolorem et saepe et nihil cumque. Et rem dolores exercitationem vel nam facere.
Porro consequatur qui consequatur voluptas aliquam nihil. Quod veniam delectus adipisci magnam consequatur eveniet. Labore cupiditate impedit eligendi aut corrupti.
Quaerat non commodi maiores eos inventore. Fugit animi omnis nesciunt explicabo. Sit beatae cupiditate numquam quo et.
Aut minus soluta culpa voluptas. Consectetur rerum sed eius ullam assumenda corrupti sequi. Debitis architecto et placeat et autem repellat commodi. Voluptas dolor voluptatem deleniti reiciendis aut cum.
Sed eum alias occaecati ab. Consequatur est recusandae doloremque voluptas odit cumque unde. Ea quibusdam accusamus occaecati culpa hic. Enim eum architecto illo et.