The Most Important Career Decision You Will Make (and how I'm making mine)

A little while ago, I wrote a post with a video from Erik Straser, partner at Mohr Davidow Ventures, who says that the most important thing you can do for your career is to "figure out how to ride a long wave - some immutable trend that is going to permeate most of the tenure of your career." He suggests that you find a "wave" that coincides with your interest, skills, geography, and what you want to do with your life. For those who missed it see the video inside the post.

Essentially, he is saying that your individual career path can be unpredictable (to an extent many people here don’t realize, due to the intense focus on the first 10 years of your career, when there are more well-trod, obvious paths to an intermediate level of success). He argues that the general environment you have chosen to work in (i.e. your industry) may be even more important than your performance. The best typewriter salesman launching his career in 1975 probably did worse than your average computer science major at the same time.

I’ve decided that he makes a great point, and have spent a while looking into my crystal ball and trying to predict the future, in pursuit of the ultimate industry choice.

Stay with me a moment - I'm going to go all the way back to the beginning of human history, and take a brief look at human economic development from the broadest perspective possible. I want to look at the record-breaking waves – the biggest of the big. Not the measly 100-foot waves that bigshot surfers try to take on. I’m talking the 1,700-foot-tall tsunamis.

Tsunami #1

To date, I consider that there have been three such tsunamis. The first is known to historians as the Neolithic Revolution – when mankind figured out how to domesticate plants and animals instead of running everywhere picking berries and chasing game. This leap to farming allowed the human race to settle down and start specialization of labor, leading to modern economies and governments.

After that, there were some decent sized waves – invention of the wheel, writing , etc. – but life continued in pretty much the same way, with humanity making relatively incremental advances, until the much more recent event of the Industrial Revolution.

Tsunami #2

Relatively simultaneous innovations like steam power, machine tools, fossil fuel energy, and effective democracy converged to change the multi-millennium worldwide economic growth flatline, leading to the development of the middle class. The creation of the middle class was revolutionary because for the first time in history, people on a large scale had the time and the freedom to innovate. Previously, millions of Einsteins and Edisons had lived and died working in the rice patties or tending the sheep, but now they were postulating relativity and inventing lightbulbs.

Tsunami #3

The distance between the Industrial Revolution and our final tsunami to date was then a mere 200 years. During the Information Revolution, with the invention of computing came a shift from an economy based on manufacturing to an economy based on information. With the ability to access computing power many times greater than our own brains, we have achieved things that humanity once only dreamed of.

We are still in the midst of the playout of the Information Revolution, as increasing integration of the physical and digital worlds (the Internet of Things, as it is being called) continues to revolutionize the way we use information to live our lives. I would argue, however, that these inventions are simply waves of the wheel and writing variety – they are surely significant, but are simply great extensions and improvements of the life made possible by the exponentially more important creation of the computer technology that served as the basis for their creation.

Tsunami #4 – What’s Next

I will also be so brash as to suggest that I know what the fourth great revolution in history will be, and even to give it a name: the Genomic Revolution.

Like steam power, machine tools, and democracy once converged to create the Industrial Revolution, the modern frontiers of technology – nanotech, 3D printing, robotics, artificial intelligence, gene splicing, and the like – are converging to a point where humanity will again be able to do something that was once at the very edge of science fiction: fast-track our own evolution.

I’m not talking about cyborgs. I’m talking about practical applications of emerging technologies in fighting disease, enhancing strength and recovery, and even extending our life span to previously unthinkable levels. As an example of what I’m talking about (and as evidence that we’re on the verge of these things happening), consider that the first 3-D printed human organ should be coming this year. 3-D printed organs have already been transplanted into mice, and it’s only a matter of time before it happens in humans, too. It will be great to eliminate the organ donor waiting list, as well as the risk of organ rejection (the patient’s own stem cells would be used), but it could also bring a new reality where, for example, we simply get a replacement heart every couple decades, essentially eliminating any heart-related disease or death.

I have been convinced by Dr. Aubrey de Grey’s book Ending Aging that I will be living longer than any human in modern history has lived to date. Think about the practical implications of this technology, and others like it that have the potential to multiply our life spans. Almost every aspect of our personal lives as well as society will be affected.

On a societal level, everything would change. It will make sense for the government to pay for every citizen to have a very high degree of education. $300,000 for a bachelors, masters, and doctorate makes sense when you consider that the individual’s tax contribution would be many times that size over a life span of a couple hundred years. Social Security and similar programs will be alive and well once more, as the scale of a couple hundred years of contributions would more than make up for the retirement period. On a personal level, almost every cost/benefit analysis that we make (i.e. everything in life) will also have totally different parameters.

After the world gets over the irrational fears that spring up when the possibility of living hundreds of years is presented to them, the demand for these types of products and services will be like nothing ever seen before, making phenomena like the explosion of computer sales pale by comparison. And living (much) longer is only one aspect of this revolution – the exponential expansion of our physical and mental abilities will be just as great an industry.

How to Hang Ten

So my advice - if you've decided it's time to move on from the generalist route (IB, PE, HF, consulting, etc.), the exponential growth industries in the near future are going to be 3-D printing, nanotech, robotics, AI, the Internet of Things, and the like. Just don't miss the Genomic bus when it comes around.

The trick, of course, is in the timing – I can’t give you an accurate timeline for when this will replace the computing industry as the highest velocity in history. In terms of career, I’m still playing the generalist, not committing to any one industry. I do have two side ventures – one nanotech, one that is probably most accurately classified as part of the integration of the physical and digital worlds that I mentioned earlier – and both of those areas may become a significant contributor to the Genomic Revolution. As that revolution approaches, these areas will be safer and surer as a career move, so I'm still weighing a move to concentrate primarily on traditional biotech.

One thing I can say for sure is that regardless of whether or not I get the timing well enough to enjoy the economic benefit of the revolution, there isn’t anything right now that is exciting to me as these possibilities. Of course, a lot of people will do awfully well in a great many other industries. But this is my best guess as to the biggest wave there will be in my lifetime. I recommend you seriously consider it.

 

Agreed - I'd give the Information Revolution another century of significant growth in the modern world before its effects hit a plateau. From my perspective, there are two main areas for the Information Revolution to continue to play out. One would be the integration of physical and digital like I talk about above, and the other would be the potential of Big Data to do to mental labor jobs what the Industrial Revolution did to physical labor jobs (automation). These two process will take at least 20-40 years to play out in the modern world, and probably at least another 50-100 to spread to everyone else.

I would also point out that the Industrial Revolution also isn't over - that's where our whole concept of first world/third world comes from. First world countries have had an Industrial Revolution; third world countries have not (or have only recently started).

 

While I highly recommend it, the book is a pretty tough read. It's supposed to be written for non-scientists, but it will probably require your full concentration to fully grasp everything. I would recommend starting with the link below (including the links on the top right of that webpage) as an intro to give you a summary without having to deal with the entire backstory.

http://www.sens.org/research/introduction-to-sens-research

 

@"Rhys da Vinci" I like the big picture thinking. I agree that the more we can find out and effect the human genome is going to lead to a lot of new industries that haven't even though of yet. However, I would argue that it may not be as huge as your other three examples. The other ones vastly changed how people could spend their time, and therefore leveraged human creativity/innovation. While the ability to extend and tailor our bodies, I really see that as just extending our current situations. Let me restate that I think this will be a tremendous change. However, when I think major shift I think of a "post-scarcity" situation, and I would like to hear what you think of that. Or if the two are connected in your mind. I believe once we get to a point where the essentials for life are available for almost no cost to nearly everyone on the planet there will be another major shift of how people spend their time, which could allow for (at least the potential) of another leap forward with what we can accomplish as a species.

 

I guess if I'm trying to call something the biggest, I should be specifying my unit of measure. In this case, my unit of measure is productivity; that is, I am calling something a "tsunami" if it is an event that increases gross human productivity in such a way that previous productivity levels look like a plateau by comparison. By that standard, I have a difficult time seeing how the Genomic Revolution would not be as big as the other three. First, each individual's productivity will be multiplied by the same factor as the increase of his lifespan. Secondly, many massive problems that have plagued the human race will be eliminated - refer to the Social Security and education examples above. In addition to that, other improvements to our physical makeup would include engineered IQ, greatly enhanced memory, elimination of the cost of most current medical requirements (prevention is better than cure), etc. The end result would be many, many multiples of current productivity levels, which is the definition of an exponential impact.

As to the "post-scarcity" debate, I would first caution that predictions of the future get exponentially more inaccurate as they project into the future. With that caveat, I will say that I don't buy into the "post-scarcity" idea. Economics 101: human needs may be limited, but human wants are not. No matter how much we have, people will always measure what they possess based on what those around them possess, and as a species, will always consider their own wants to be more important that even the needs of others.

As you define it, actually, I would contend have already reached "post-scarcity". We have more than enough resources to feed, clothe, and shelter everyone in the world, but we don't - which illustrates my point.

Great thoughts - thanks for posting.

 

Great write up, I agree with most of your points but I have trouble believing that we will be able to extend our lives by whole number multiples in our lifetimes. The reason being the lack of genetic understanding.

Currently, gene therapy is unfeasible for most diseases because we do not understand the interactions of turning certain coding on/off. Furthermore, what was once considered "junk" DNA, which composes 98% of the human genome, has now been verified to be active in various steps before protein production. Given the complexity of our genetics, what catalyst do you predict that will push us to the path of understanding our genes to the levels indicated in your write up?

 
Best Response

This post is very accurate and points out something that we all surely feel coming, but it may be too obvious for anyone to call it out.

I strongly advise listening to this TedTalk by futurist, Google's director of engineering, and noted inventor Ray Kurzweil. He has groundbreaking views on artificial intelligence, merging of computer science and psychology/biology, and some of the technology Rhys refers to.

http://www.ted.com/talks/ray_kurzweil_on_how_technology_will_transform_…

People are scared to try and guess the "new wave" because they don't want to miss if they're wrong. But, as Wayne Gretzky would probably agree, kudos for taking the shot.

We are here to drink beer. We are here to kill war. We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well that Death will tremble to take us. - Charles Bukowski
 

Grayson, "post-scarcity" is going to be an interesting situation. With production and distribution of resources fully automated by a robust robotic infrastructure, how will societies choose to allocate resources fairly amongst its members? I believe that a free market system has worked wonders in the last 100 years developing our economies to yield the highest standard of living humans have ever seen. But if human labor becomes effectively obsolete, how will we allocate resources then?

 

Although if people start to live much longer, you could always just become a financial planner. The people with the largest wealth will be the first with access to the new, life-preserving technology.

Boom, commission & fees for days.

We are here to drink beer. We are here to kill war. We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well that Death will tremble to take us. - Charles Bukowski
 

That's a group with a pretty wide range of perspectives, all the way from the downright crazy to the frustratingly intransigent. To get some perspective, I would refer to the SENS Research Advisory Board, which is a collection of academics and industry leaders who serve as official advisors to Dr. de Grey's organization dedicated to ending aging. The quality of the people listed seem to indicate to me that these things are at least beginning to be broadly accepted as the natural extension of current research activities.

 

To me, it makes sense that cyborgism and transhumanism would overcome the plateau of the (expected) genomic revolution. Leaving behind the constraints of the physical human body seems like it would reach greater grounds than could be accomplished through computer generated and printed 3D organs. Imagine how much more advanced medicine would be if we could create self servicing and producing hearts, brains, intestines, etc. Additionally progressive, imagine robot bodies where our "brains" were part of a collective intelligence network or something else with incredibly far reaching implications that would change the course of the human race.

 

Very thought-provoking article (not often you read stuff like this on WSO). I have to be cynical with @machineman13, though - even if our understanding of the genetic code accelerates by leaps and bounds in the coming decades (thanks to AI, robotics, etc. that support this advancement), there's still such a HUGE volume of things that we absolutely don't understand. The premise seems simple enough - replace dying cells with new ones - but in practice I think we're a while away from multi-century lifespan and glory.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

I'm thinking if you read Dr. de Grey's book, or even just looked at the summary here, you would be surprised at how far we actually are already. Like I mentioned directly above, we don't have to discover multi-century lifespan-giving techniques in the next few years - we just need to perfect things that already partially exist, and on a rolling basis increase life spans enough to get to the next few years.

 

Cupiditate vel voluptatem et voluptatem est rerum. Itaque inventore dicta aut quo. Veritatis ullam dicta et et. Dolor sit aliquam in.

 

Corporis aspernatur non eos consequatur incidunt voluptatibus. Expedita ratione molestiae et eaque voluptatum laudantium veritatis aut. Labore itaque omnis impedit saepe.

Qui odio iusto voluptatibus laboriosam voluptatem hic. Consequatur unde voluptatem autem et. Odit officiis quidem occaecati aliquid ex dignissimos non. Labore dolorum laudantium labore rerum numquam impedit omnis. Praesentium quos eos aut voluptatem id laborum. Nihil sit deleniti alias at officia quo cum voluptatem.

Et repudiandae iusto repellendus in dolorem. Rerum accusamus corrupti perspiciatis dolor nihil aut dicta. Porro laudantium doloribus excepturi non at. Consectetur veritatis velit nihil accusamus. Nam dicta distinctio tempore in qui illum. Eos omnis voluptatum sunt quis et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”