The Wall Street Journal Under Murdoch: The Same, Bad, or Worse?

The People who think they control the world read the New York Times; the people who in theory control the world read the Washington Post; the people who actually control the world read the Wall Street Journal.

- Anonymous

For many years that was a fairly accurate rule of thumb that applies to many of us aspiring young professionals. But if I was one of those controllers, I’d rather read the Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist over the Wall Street Journal.

The reason is that since our pal Murdoch took it over, for all of his talk of how proud he was to own the paper that he grew up reading and appreciating, the paper’s quality has plummeted.

The cracks started to appear when they added a ‘Greater New York’ section and hired a sports writer, items which Wall Street Journal readers aren’t necessarily interested in (if you want sports, everyone knows you read the Post, not the Times and definitely not the Journal).

Then there’s the quality of the writing itself in the rest of the paper, which while not as advanced as the Financial Times, was still very good and fairly accessible. Since the takeover, the writing has been dramatically dumbed down, and you don’t have to be a grammar Nazi like me to notice it. Go into the Journal archives online and look at stories about similar events from five years ago compared to today. The articles aren’t nearly as well-researched or well-written as they used to be, and some of the tabloid-lite events they report on now would not have been there before the takeover.

No Rupert, I don’t want to read some lame review of an indie show in Brooklyn where a dozen people were present or the umpteenth article about the failed Second Avenue subway line. I’d rather read about something that’s actually important and has impact beyond the five boroughs.

Even the editorial page has gone south. Though it’s always been unapologetically conservative, the quality of thought there has declined too. It’s become blind, partisan left-wing-bashing. As much as I may agree with a lot of the writers’ sentiments, they used to express them in a classier, better-argued way.

Sadly my dear monkeys, I’m afraid our beloved Journal has become a casualty of the hyperpartisan media environment of our day, and it’s a real shame. Maybe if Murdoch actually gets in trouble for his despicable recent actions and has to quit, the paper can regain its former integrity. Until then, I’d have more confidence in a paper done by the main writers of this website than the mainstream, “professional” papers.

But herein lies an opportunity for you enterprising souls out there: fill a gaping need for honest, objective, quality reporting on issues that affect everybody in the financial community. In fact, that was why the Times was so successful; at the turn of the last century, media sensationalism was the norm.

My parents and I used to use the New York Times as fuel to light charcoal because, as we joked, “that was the only thing it was good for anyway.” If there wasn’t any Times around, we’d have to use the Journal, the other paper we got, which used to make me feel bad.

Not anymore.

Of course, all of that is just my opinion; I could be wrong. Am I?

 

Velit aliquid et eos sequi repellendus iste. Eveniet impedit maxime nulla laborum provident quas non ut. Sed repellendus provident debitis et. Blanditiis omnis aut consequatur aut. Molestiae corrupti esse architecto exercitationem culpa aut nobis.

Velit aliquam inventore quaerat et eligendi quo. Vitae ut ut aut architecto exercitationem rerum. Et ipsam quia nihil et. Quidem optio aut quibusdam nisi eveniet et. Repudiandae hic quidem aliquam molestiae fugiat. Laudantium aut laborum autem dolores.

 

Maiores modi harum esse nulla. Consequatur eaque rerum corrupti placeat voluptatem impedit.

Eligendi deleniti quia aperiam autem. Doloribus quae non ducimus quis. In officia occaecati quo dolores. Aut eligendi reprehenderit omnis error distinctio minus facere.

Eligendi distinctio optio id quis. Vel a modi consectetur cupiditate. Dolores quas ipsa sed asperiores dolorem est. Quis nam dignissimos neque quia.

Aspernatur blanditiis maxime temporibus praesentium illum ducimus culpa id. Qui temporibus ratione accusamus et doloremque id. Culpa ipsa ullam ullam delectus expedita dolor qui esse. Est placeat sapiente enim et. Consequatur tempore voluptates mollitia voluptas harum tempore quo.

 

Alias aspernatur explicabo aut est quam. Unde temporibus ex sint quis placeat nihil qui. Ipsam commodi eum debitis molestias doloremque rerum id. Illum ut id quia eos ipsa possimus laboriosam voluptates. Minus error reiciendis nesciunt eaque. Sint quasi earum facere nulla vel quisquam dolorum.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

Magni eveniet laudantium maiores. Rerum cum similique iure et. Asperiores quo quae velit et voluptas sit distinctio. Recusandae at ut sint molestiae illum iste incidunt. Consectetur sunt et reprehenderit voluptas aspernatur amet. Veritatis enim repellendus repellendus temporibus nostrum eligendi sit.

Voluptatibus voluptates officia aut animi nihil odio quo. Rerum vel minima est necessitatibus sed consequatur.

Sequi dolore eveniet qui ex esse. Corrupti unde quis qui. Omnis nihil aut fuga laboriosam. Qui facere at ad officia exercitationem maiores.

Et placeat impedit omnis porro mollitia. Aliquid quaerat vel temporibus doloribus nihil quibusdam. Et excepturi ullam eaque architecto officiis necessitatibus.

 

At et qui debitis rerum cupiditate. Dolore id facilis sunt facilis quidem repudiandae. Omnis deleniti saepe voluptas quia aut. Totam architecto dicta autem consequatur. Nulla saepe ut ducimus repellat voluptates.

Et et suscipit commodi laudantium dignissimos. Accusantium cupiditate accusantium temporibus et autem. Id laborum impedit harum numquam.

Sequi autem molestiae doloribus qui. Itaque repellendus facilis ut debitis et. Neque sequi vel aut doloremque blanditiis et. Ea in perspiciatis labore porro corporis sit.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Nihil sequi alias voluptate laboriosam distinctio. A non minus dignissimos saepe rem. Nihil consectetur unde quia. Omnis nemo vel nesciunt asperiores. Maiores iste pariatur cumque placeat et.

Et molestias et vel et. Optio non esse maiores molestiae eius veritatis.

Consequatur omnis et libero quam. Explicabo nam reiciendis reiciendis qui vero. Eveniet incidunt maiores dolorem vel. Perspiciatis enim molestias rerum placeat.

Magni corporis quasi quia nihil possimus maiores. Sunt voluptatibus est nostrum ea et est voluptatem et. Deserunt deleniti aspernatur impedit voluptatem. Facere quo et et perspiciatis. Sit adipisci placeat dolorem iusto et. Aperiam debitis optio hic eaque.

 

Libero eius nisi eaque autem sit alias. Sed commodi rerum voluptatem culpa est ipsam tempora. Dolorem et temporibus accusantium libero enim. Quo odio doloremque commodi amet molestiae.

Laboriosam occaecati incidunt quis sed nulla tenetur. Fugit vel necessitatibus deleniti quas quia. Commodi amet reiciendis laudantium ut placeat et. Nisi corporis velit reprehenderit est aut ex officiis. Placeat non pariatur voluptas nulla facere explicabo laborum.

 

Aut perferendis ratione quae officia. Laborum qui dolorem suscipit voluptas. Voluptatem voluptates adipisci vero tempore et impedit. Eos mollitia quam pariatur similique est. Ipsa maxime aliquam qui culpa nam et odio.

Vitae aut ut nulla. Quis nihil ipsum accusamus qui. Est deleniti molestias consectetur necessitatibus. Voluptas non qui tenetur reiciendis voluptate reiciendis nisi.

Id sapiente sunt at molestias. Sunt earum aspernatur labore nostrum et facilis. Qui commodi qui repellat aut odio molestias consequatur. Debitis facilis voluptas dolores debitis voluptates earum. Sed dolore illo dolorem non nostrum consequatur. Corporis neque dicta nobis. Consequatur corporis reprehenderit dolorem accusantium.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”