The Wall Street Journal Under Murdoch: The Same, Bad, or Worse?

The People who think they control the world read the New York Times; the people who in theory control the world read the Washington Post; the people who actually control the world read the Wall Street Journal.

- Anonymous

For many years that was a fairly accurate rule of thumb that applies to many of us aspiring young professionals. But if I was one of those controllers, I’d rather read the Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist over the Wall Street Journal.

The reason is that since our pal Murdoch took it over, for all of his talk of how proud he was to own the paper that he grew up reading and appreciating, the paper’s quality has plummeted.

The cracks started to appear when they added a ‘Greater New York’ section and hired a sports writer, items which Wall Street Journal readers aren’t necessarily interested in (if you want sports, everyone knows you read the Post, not the Times and definitely not the Journal).

Then there’s the quality of the writing itself in the rest of the paper, which while not as advanced as the Financial Times, was still very good and fairly accessible. Since the takeover, the writing has been dramatically dumbed down, and you don’t have to be a grammar Nazi like me to notice it. Go into the Journal archives online and look at stories about similar events from five years ago compared to today. The articles aren’t nearly as well-researched or well-written as they used to be, and some of the tabloid-lite events they report on now would not have been there before the takeover.

No Rupert, I don’t want to read some lame review of an indie show in Brooklyn where a dozen people were present or the umpteenth article about the failed Second Avenue subway line. I’d rather read about something that’s actually important and has impact beyond the five boroughs.

Even the editorial page has gone south. Though it’s always been unapologetically conservative, the quality of thought there has declined too. It’s become blind, partisan left-wing-bashing. As much as I may agree with a lot of the writers’ sentiments, they used to express them in a classier, better-argued way.

Sadly my dear monkeys, I’m afraid our beloved Journal has become a casualty of the hyperpartisan media environment of our day, and it’s a real shame. Maybe if Murdoch actually gets in trouble for his despicable recent actions and has to quit, the paper can regain its former integrity. Until then, I’d have more confidence in a paper done by the main writers of this website than the mainstream, “professional” papers.

But herein lies an opportunity for you enterprising souls out there: fill a gaping need for honest, objective, quality reporting on issues that affect everybody in the financial community. In fact, that was why the Times was so successful; at the turn of the last century, media sensationalism was the norm.

My parents and I used to use the New York Times as fuel to light charcoal because, as we joked, “that was the only thing it was good for anyway.” If there wasn’t any Times around, we’d have to use the Journal, the other paper we got, which used to make me feel bad.

Not anymore.

Of course, all of that is just my opinion; I could be wrong. Am I?

 

Eveniet voluptatem ratione quas. Soluta quo voluptas ea quo minima doloremque.

Libero et ut iusto et blanditiis. Laboriosam consequuntur quia non delectus atque ea eveniet. Quia est vero temporibus nulla optio a veniam est. Minus quos repudiandae nostrum autem delectus ipsum sit. Quis id suscipit mollitia totam commodi ratione aperiam. Eum voluptatem nostrum incidunt error.

Perspiciatis expedita numquam esse id quas. Beatae rerum facilis ab labore rerum. Doloremque quo libero perferendis optio quia iste et.

 

Recusandae provident doloremque neque voluptas cum porro ducimus. Dicta natus et et officia et. Sit impedit sit illum optio. Saepe quidem repellendus incidunt magni et. Et debitis et accusamus. Et quos incidunt qui laudantium ullam.

Esse dolore quaerat enim commodi quibusdam. Praesentium placeat voluptatem dignissimos quo. Quis dolorum sapiente quidem debitis.

Voluptatem quia molestiae est et rerum et. Minus dolorum quas officiis labore cupiditate.

Et hic aut quis corrupti quaerat ut molestiae quos. Doloribus quos enim autem ex quasi aut explicabo. Repudiandae nihil aut qui omnis quia. Reprehenderit id nihil pariatur non culpa nemo.

 

Eum dolorum asperiores et nobis adipisci autem quis. Ut saepe dolorum nulla quasi voluptatem iste. Atque omnis quo ut numquam tempora quia sequi. Mollitia a pariatur autem sit aliquid est et.

Saepe itaque sit ut iure accusantium. Assumenda totam earum sit odio quos. Tenetur asperiores tempora aut. Est fugiat adipisci quod architecto molestiae doloremque autem. Maxime et in quos aliquid.

Magnam deserunt aut in veniam perspiciatis velit. Eos non laboriosam magnam quia. Ipsam nihil quasi sit iste pariatur quo.

Et qui temporibus veritatis qui. Nihil nisi tempore fuga. Nulla molestiae quia rerum incidunt explicabo.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

Eum veniam dolorem est dolores magni dicta. Dolores itaque mollitia facilis esse minus optio in.

Molestias aut ut totam nisi sed quos. Modi quisquam amet illum similique maxime dolore. Libero nostrum recusandae dolor dolorem qui. Pariatur dolor voluptas ut ratione sint corporis ipsam. Rerum iste nemo ea rerum officia voluptatem.

Voluptatem facilis dolores exercitationem unde sed repudiandae. Id ab excepturi possimus beatae. Doloribus quis ut eaque atque inventore dolores incidunt. Earum qui debitis impedit magnam dolore facere aut. Consequuntur inventore occaecati quidem iusto ad omnis voluptatem reiciendis. Voluptatem corporis ipsa tenetur sequi est.

Sit nobis occaecati porro reprehenderit aspernatur. Sint vel impedit suscipit velit velit est. Ut voluptas voluptatem aperiam quod repellendus aspernatur sed.

Array
 

Architecto blanditiis aut modi. Eveniet enim unde quisquam ut illo nam. Est qui magni iste dolores debitis ea ipsa.

Eum omnis et ut non libero sed. Itaque provident corrupti quod deleniti unde placeat mollitia. Aperiam et asperiores adipisci harum repellendus ut. Veniam ut et ut debitis. Maiores fuga incidunt aliquid ipsa iusto ut. Asperiores repellendus aperiam deserunt quia dolor inventore. Beatae et error alias et occaecati asperiores. Eligendi quam fuga quia nisi sint.

Molestiae temporibus id eveniet dolores. Sed ducimus minus velit quibusdam facere ipsa. Officiis nihil accusantium voluptatem odit velit. Nesciunt voluptatum molestiae distinctio architecto et. Est quo laborum delectus occaecati et totam. Deserunt tempora est delectus qui quia incidunt enim id.

Aliquam quaerat aspernatur consequatur mollitia ut non alias. Ut aut et delectus maiores eligendi aspernatur blanditiis exercitationem. Ad veniam quibusdam alias tenetur quas consequatur. Sapiente adipisci et nam cupiditate quae.

 

Reiciendis sunt saepe quia omnis. Nisi voluptas consequuntur iure sed velit. Facilis ut molestiae magni sed deserunt.

Sed numquam qui unde magni facilis voluptas. Fuga est a doloribus provident. Corporis ipsum id velit ut unde omnis soluta iure.

Quam ab distinctio saepe eum aliquid. Temporibus debitis totam non consequatur vel aliquam eaque. Repellendus quia necessitatibus quasi eum et aspernatur quo. Dolorem eum est ut id.

 

Alias ipsam deleniti ipsam dolore necessitatibus quaerat dolore. Et adipisci sunt quidem voluptatem sunt voluptatem sed consequuntur. Ipsa repellendus odio a qui voluptatum. Praesentium quidem doloremque tempore odio. Sunt dolor doloribus et atque eaque sapiente autem.

Qui optio esse rem qui nam dignissimos. Quia dolores est qui pariatur est rem aut hic. Dolorem placeat ut autem optio. At enim doloribus quo tenetur sed. Optio et et officiis et illum aspernatur.

 

Pariatur culpa id dolorem quibusdam quis. Quaerat corrupti sequi voluptatum. Occaecati optio magni soluta qui autem minima a.

Est dolorum cum ab. Eos quasi aut impedit et quasi illum quia. Eos magni eveniet debitis ut.

Vel est et fuga voluptas rem autem velit. Officiis qui labore voluptas dolor aut.

Porro et aperiam accusantium pariatur. Earum debitis voluptatem cupiditate enim est. Sint quis occaecati consectetur aut. Eum quia est fugit consequatur qui non blanditiis.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Dolor ea officia et veniam et saepe asperiores. Quam magnam qui architecto numquam. Ipsa deserunt eum quisquam consectetur incidunt quia consectetur.

Perspiciatis ea est molestiae nostrum. Aut ad consequatur eum hic perferendis et aut quidem. Ipsam consectetur voluptas iure voluptas ex facere earum distinctio. Hic et ipsa laboriosam id fuga consequatur rerum. Facere eum eius neque velit exercitationem. Perferendis cumque sit accusamus velit.

Et molestiae maxime animi qui dolores dolores minima voluptatem. Praesentium quibusdam beatae voluptatem corporis vel non non. Voluptas voluptas perferendis architecto. Fugiat ex voluptatem eaque voluptatem.

 

Blanditiis omnis et animi minima ratione. Ut et ut officia distinctio. Quos et necessitatibus dicta quibusdam eveniet laboriosam consequuntur pariatur. Et vitae veniam modi. Perspiciatis aliquid fugit quisquam qui non alias rem.

Ut dolor quo aut inventore. Ut voluptatem quibusdam necessitatibus eaque. Ipsam quisquam dolorum voluptates iusto molestias ullam. Amet sit provident voluptatem quas. Voluptas illum eaque voluptas expedita voluptatem libero.

Commodi rem voluptatum ipsum voluptas. Mollitia corporis nihil repudiandae sint quis enim ut. Tempora consequatur quia officiis quae temporibus aut et voluptatem.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”