They are what you eat (and drink)

Uni-lever, Mars, Pepsi, Coca Cola, Kraft, Nestle, P&G, General Mills, Kellogs and Johnson and Johnson. These are the ten companies that rule over many of the brands you buy knowingly or unknowingly.

Ever wonder why you can't get a Coke at Taco Bell? It's because Yum! Brands was created as a spin-off of Pepsi--and has a lifetime contract with the soda-maker.
Unilever produces everything from Dove soap to Klondike bars. Nestle has a big stake in L'Oreal, which features everything from cosmetics to Diesel designer jeans.

No one is saying these companies are like Keiretsu's in Japan, although i will admit that was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this diagram (see below). Considering most of this is retail I'm sure you can do this with other industries. What are your thoughts? Is it slightly disturbing that so few companies have controlling stakes in most of the food/bev products you consume?

Source http://www.businessinsider.com/these-10-corporations-control-almost-eve…

 
UFOinsider:
You just figured out that the U.S. is a plutocracy? George Washinton's family fortune was one of the originals. Welcome to real life.

Didn't Citi release an investor statement saying something about this?

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

There are massive economies of scale and scope in retail due to sales and distribution chains. This doesn't bother me at all. In fact, consolidation probably means I get my products cheaper than I otherwise would. As long as there is at least one or two big competitors per industry to compete on price and quality (not to mention private label brands) there is sufficient price pressure to keep things from getting out of hand.

 

Boothorbust

There are massive economies of scale and scope in retail due to sales and distribution chains. This doesn't bother me at all. In fact, consolidation probably means I get my products cheaper than I otherwise would. As long as there is at least one or two big competitors like per industry to compete on price and quality (not to mention private label brands) there is sufficient price pressure to keep things from getting out of hand.

Indeed, everything here depends on yuor choice and reliability of the brand. If the company has enough stuff and budget to develop further with your needs, it'll be the best one. Why not choose such?

 

[quote=Texsun]Has anyone tried out 'Trader Joes'? I believe they produce all their own products and they are super cheap.

They are also a better place to work then Goldman Sachs according to Econwatch on CBS.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8300-503983_162-503983.html?categoryId=10430[/qu…]

Trader Joe's: where mid-20s males and mid-30s females go to "network" with each other

And let's be honest, anywhere is a better place to work than Goldman Sachs.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 

[quote=Texsun]Has anyone tried out 'Trader Joes'? I believe they produce all their own products and they are super cheap.

They are also a better place to work then Goldman Sachs according to Econwatch on CBS.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8300-503983_162-503983.html?categoryId=10430[/qu…]

They had a trader joe's around where I went to school but sadly they also had a whole foods, which was definitely the nicer of the two stores (at least in my area). Also love Wegman's

 

I have no problem with a corporation controlling so many brands. There is a certain level of security for a consumer to choose Crest or Tide versus some generic knock off, and more power to the companies that make them for having such strong brands.

 

Yeah, most of your food is industrialised garbage...

Have you not see Food Inc? Great film...

http://www.youtube.com/embed/5eKYyD14d_0?rel=0

Please don't repeat nonsense about choice, low costs, etc... under the current system. Oligopolies and monopolies don't result in good outcomes for consumers or society... (concentration of power, regulatory capture, negative externalities and for you econo-fundamentalist it also results in deadweight losses / allocation inefficiencies and let's not forget government subsidies).

With the non-food products I love how loyal some people are to brands when the product is essentially the same as the next one... I bet in most cases they come off the same assembly line. If you have any marketing / advertising / product branding friends ask them a little about their jobs. You'd be surprised at how easily they manipulate the masses (i.e. you / us). Crest Vs. Colgate? Might as well go generic, it's the same crap.

 

I don't see why people think this is necessarily a bad thing. These companies handle the infrastructure for daily life, and the amount of tedious work involved in doing so is largely kept out of sight. Do YOU want to run supply chains?

In a way, this is history repeating itself along the lines of trusts being built up early last century. This time around, however, the technology exists to support them and they actually produce something. The thing that I think firghtens most people is how unaccountable these organizations are to the publice: we really have no say beyond voting with our dollars, which is a poor substitute for actual democracy, so keeping an eye on these companies is wise.

Get busy living
 
UFOinsider:
I don't see why people think this is necessarily a bad thing. These companies handle the infrastructure for daily life, and the amount of tedious work involved in doing so is largely kept out of sight. Do YOU want to run supply chains?

In a way, this is history repeating itself along the lines of trusts being built up early last century. This time around, however, the technology exists to support them and they actually produce something. The thing that I think firghtens most people is how unaccountable these organizations are to the publice: we really have no say beyond voting with our dollars, which is a poor substitute for actual democracy, so keeping an eye on these companies is wise.

I largely agree with your last statement. Even though you may think you have a choice, it is all really one brand or another. They may be good brands which create an efficient consumer experience, but the lack of competition is a little astonishing.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

Quasi veniam aut consectetur deleniti vel minima eius. Aut sunt sint optio eveniet. Perferendis soluta voluptatibus reprehenderit qui voluptatibus fugit. Aut autem quos distinctio itaque magni placeat. Sed repudiandae excepturi officia est veritatis omnis et. Sequi quia qui non quam eius laborum. Iusto ut enim sit sint sunt.

Enim fuga qui ut enim sapiente debitis eius. Distinctio ad est voluptas ducimus quia. Et qui amet voluptatem sed. Ducimus quo sed laboriosam saepe illum et iusto dolor.

Eum ab sint dolores voluptatem officia. Animi sequi maiores molestias. Et harum non fuga est consequatur delectus porro. Voluptatem et omnis placeat.

Iusto ipsum perspiciatis quaerat ut sed in quisquam. Exercitationem laboriosam repudiandae esse labore minus et molestiae. Vitae est in itaque repellat.

 

Beatae aliquid molestias sed enim. Aliquam amet qui id dolor. Aut mollitia sunt adipisci amet reiciendis cumque voluptatem. Similique explicabo vitae consequatur omnis qui officiis aliquam quis.

Quia quis cum exercitationem est molestiae. Molestiae qui et esse et est vel. Quam aspernatur vero sunt dolore. Magnam cupiditate asperiores hic est minus. Ea repudiandae repudiandae eum pariatur nam perferendis architecto.

Consequatur et pariatur necessitatibus facere sint aut voluptates. Eaque voluptates ratione voluptatum repudiandae nulla placeat beatae facere. Omnis et praesentium earum provident. Corrupti sed dolorem deserunt rerum aut enim.

Placeat eum possimus pariatur id sed consequatur. Cum laborum sit fuga doloribus dolores. Molestiae quibusdam voluptatibus facere est necessitatibus repellendus porro. Dignissimos commodi voluptatem nam ab.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”