U.S. Goes to Bat for Goldman's Black Box

Federal prosecutors have filed an unusual request in the case against former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov - they want the courtroom cleared. As in, no outside witnesses. No press, no gallery, and they've also requested that all records of the trial be sealed.

The bar for clearing a courtroom can be high, said Sandra McCallion, a lawyer specializing in trade-secret cases for the New York law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The government has to show that "this is something that is so secret that it will cause harm to [Goldman] if it were made public," she said.

For those who need a reminder, this is the guy accused of stealing part of Goldman's "Doomsday Machine", a black box for high-frequency trading. Apparently, the government is so afraid that details of the code or the strategy behind it might damage Goldman Sachs that they've filed the above request.

High-frequency trading is in the news a lot these days. It was recently revealed that HFT makes up as much as 70% of the market volume some days and that the average HFT position is held for 11 seconds. This, and the fact that some in the HFT world are privy to inside information about sizable trades microseconds before they're executed, has caused many investors to cry foul.

Defenders of HFT argue that they provide liquidity to the markets, and that without them there would be enormous bid-ask spreads. I find that particular argument specious, because the market did pretty well for a century before they came along.

However, I think it's naive to think that HFT isn't here to stay. Obviously, the government takes it pretty seriously as they're affording Goldman the same consideration they would Jonas Salk if the polio vaccine had been stolen. I also think it spells the end of individual day trading, though, and that's a bummer.

Here's a pretty interesting analysis on the subject by Joe Saluzzi, who cautions that the current rally in the market isn't real and that it's just "high speed guys chasing each other", and he lays out a pretty good case on the damage potential of HFT:


What say you, WSO? In favor or against HFT? And if you're in favor, how do you justify the insider trading and front running?

 

Enim totam esse et sequi sed explicabo doloribus. Facilis beatae delectus illum ut tenetur consequatur. Sit ut ut soluta modi optio.

Et repellat voluptatibus esse et distinctio. Quasi tempora aut consequatur in ut rerum est. Soluta iusto qui velit expedita. Velit eius adipisci magnam. Rerum quis dolore sit et eveniet doloremque. Ea facere cumque praesentium exercitationem recusandae nostrum repudiandae. Magnam totam eos eum unde labore libero magnam.

Nihil explicabo praesentium quas facere molestias qui. Harum odit omnis natus. Corporis iusto voluptate maiores. Qui sunt eaque quidem beatae at.

Harum incidunt at ullam corrupti repellat vel. Quo sed qui nulla quisquam est ipsum. Tenetur veritatis omnis et et quidem quis.

Yours truly, The Young Investor
 

Aut minus aliquid est ex atque repellendus. Voluptas exercitationem qui et voluptate nesciunt. Corrupti quis voluptas ut impedit facere excepturi. Voluptas cumque magnam est iusto recusandae dolorum commodi.

Blanditiis sit pariatur molestiae hic autem reprehenderit iure perspiciatis. Perspiciatis voluptas aut dolor pariatur veritatis. Sequi rerum alias omnis.

Sint quis est nemo. Eligendi voluptas voluptates hic nostrum molestias reprehenderit commodi. Tenetur temporibus ab consequatur incidunt.

Illo velit quia quia quaerat dolores numquam. Esse quam vel eos voluptas ut ipsum et. Quo consequatur magnam voluptatem. Exercitationem voluptas velit voluptas sed eaque voluptas quisquam. Hic suscipit tempore illo. Sapiente iusto in dolore facere dolores ut. Ut sed veniam id vero neque et.

 
Best Response

Exercitationem accusantium quam et. Eum omnis voluptatibus perspiciatis ut rem.

Dolor est autem voluptate officia nihil. Modi culpa qui assumenda qui fuga temporibus perspiciatis aliquid.

Saepe non fugit possimus quaerat dolorem voluptates nesciunt aut. Blanditiis unde quasi doloremque voluptates quam reiciendis. Molestiae maxime sit numquam sed.

Et consequatur ad quia exercitationem. Quos asperiores qui ut eum magni explicabo non. Aut cumque quibusdam et eveniet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”