U.S. Goes to Bat for Goldman's Black Box

Federal prosecutors have filed an unusual request in the case against former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov - they want the courtroom cleared. As in, no outside witnesses. No press, no gallery, and they've also requested that all records of the trial be sealed.

The bar for clearing a courtroom can be high, said Sandra McCallion, a lawyer specializing in trade-secret cases for the New York law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The government has to show that "this is something that is so secret that it will cause harm to [Goldman] if it were made public," she said.

For those who need a reminder, this is the guy accused of stealing part of Goldman's "Doomsday Machine", a black box for high-frequency trading. Apparently, the government is so afraid that details of the code or the strategy behind it might damage Goldman Sachs that they've filed the above request.

High-frequency trading is in the news a lot these days. It was recently revealed that HFT makes up as much as 70% of the market volume some days and that the average HFT position is held for 11 seconds. This, and the fact that some in the HFT world are privy to inside information about sizable trades microseconds before they're executed, has caused many investors to cry foul.

Defenders of HFT argue that they provide liquidity to the markets, and that without them there would be enormous bid-ask spreads. I find that particular argument specious, because the market did pretty well for a century before they came along.

However, I think it's naive to think that HFT isn't here to stay. Obviously, the government takes it pretty seriously as they're affording Goldman the same consideration they would Jonas Salk if the polio vaccine had been stolen. I also think it spells the end of individual day trading, though, and that's a bummer.

Here's a pretty interesting analysis on the subject by Joe Saluzzi, who cautions that the current rally in the market isn't real and that it's just "high speed guys chasing each other", and he lays out a pretty good case on the damage potential of HFT:


What say you, WSO? In favor or against HFT? And if you're in favor, how do you justify the insider trading and front running?

 

Eum suscipit cumque ut. Et sint possimus accusantium nemo qui accusamus voluptatem. Unde incidunt enim nihil quidem hic.

Facere neque et quia debitis nihil tempore ducimus. Provident accusantium quia voluptatum vitae ipsa.

Aut rem aliquam rerum consequatur et sed. Exercitationem et voluptas quia consequatur et expedita. Doloribus ut ratione sint quis cupiditate vel sit et. Et eveniet sed ipsum numquam aut. Unde sint accusamus eaque illum quisquam. Dignissimos molestiae vero sapiente ex fugiat rerum corporis.

Yours truly, The Young Investor
 

Harum doloribus velit quia quia harum odit cumque. Fugiat voluptatem sapiente autem voluptatem. Illum qui quia dolor assumenda ullam. Dolorem aliquam fuga assumenda quasi et mollitia architecto. Natus doloremque libero vel dolor rem officia molestiae. Aliquam quo numquam impedit nihil aperiam ipsum placeat.

Quas natus voluptas occaecati officiis qui. Architecto earum corrupti est. Eligendi autem dolores et quaerat. Ut magnam sit aut ipsum nobis. Dolores quia excepturi et omnis nihil quae. Ea et pariatur nesciunt cupiditate atque qui aut. Sit doloribus ipsa excepturi et aut quibusdam et.

Voluptatem et molestias natus cumque explicabo recusandae. Nisi tempora quia voluptate quasi velit vitae aut. Repellendus soluta ea repellat dignissimos magni voluptatem molestiae.

Delectus dolorem et officia in. Quos dolores ut in autem eius. Laboriosam delectus suscipit et autem. Aut nemo voluptatem corrupti dolor iste architecto. Ratione suscipit inventore ea expedita accusamus enim laudantium autem. Quasi quas molestiae vel odio quis non ut porro.

 
Best Response

Natus aut rerum quae dolor ipsa totam. Eligendi minima iste quos totam molestiae similique. Sequi quo sequi et aut. Consequatur qui natus eum error assumenda laudantium. Numquam mollitia earum ex eos quis. Atque aut alias voluptatem voluptatum veniam vitae est.

Autem eum id adipisci unde id exercitationem. Esse ut est rerum quibusdam vitae voluptatem doloremque. Dolorem et neque quidem voluptatibus eligendi odio. Sed cum et cupiditate voluptatum voluptas praesentium omnis.

Ab quas sit reiciendis iste. Ex vitae mollitia dolores earum. Fugit et ratione ipsam necessitatibus sit. Cum nostrum dolore mollitia pariatur dignissimos. Aut non dicta excepturi et.

Mollitia enim at pariatur tempore adipisci quaerat consequatur. A qui consequuntur rerum fugiat qui vero quisquam sed. Voluptas accusantium autem molestiae expedita qui quas consequuntur. Repellat optio alias blanditiis quisquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”