Valuation of the week 1: A Tesla Test

I taught the first session of my valuation class, that I previewed in my last post, today. As part of that class, I do what I call a “valuation of the week”, where I pick a company and value it and then post both my valuation (with the spreadsheet and the raw data that I used) and a shared Google spreadsheet for anyone who wants to take my valuation and make it their own (by changing the assumptions).

I do this for two reasons. First, I believe that you learn valuation by valuing real companies in real time, not by talking about valuation or reading about it. Second, from a purely selfish standpoint, I pick the companies that I find interesting as potential investments or as real world case studies for my valuations of the week. I find the “crowd valuation” that emerges from this process to be useful in reassessing my own valuations.

As my first valuation of the week, I picked Tesla, for three reasons. First, as a technology company in an otherwise capital-intensive, mature business (the automobile manufacturing business), it stands out. Second, the company has a charismatic CEO, Elon Musk, an ambitious man (and I don’t mean that in a negative sense) with a great deal of imagination.

Third,  the stock has taken off in the last year, up more than 500%, fueled by both positive news on the product front as well as on the financial front (increasing revenues, declining losses, paying down of debt). 

At its current stock price of $168.76/share, the market capitalization for the company is more than $20 billion. The question for investors, both in and out of the stock, is not whether the company was a good investment over the last year (of course, it was) but whether it is a good investment today. You can download the most recent annual and quarterly reports for the company.

Using the standard metrics, the company seems  over valued. With revenues of $1.33 billion and an operating loss of -$217 million over the last twelve months, it seems absurd to attach a value of more than $20 billion to the company. At close to 15.4 times revenues, Tesla is being valued more like a young technology company than an automobile company. However, these standard metrics are also often misleading with young companies, since value should be driven not by revenues and earnings today but by expectations for these values in the future.

Expected Revenues

For Tesla to be able to deliver value as a company, it is clear that it has to scale up revenues. On the good news front, the company has had a good year, with the revenues in the first six months of 2013 of $956 million representing a surge from revenues of $41 million in the first six months of 2012. While growth will get more difficult as the company continues to become larger, the question of how difficult cannot be answered until we define the potential market for the company.

If we define it narrowly as electric/hybrid cars, the market is small (even though it is growing) and the potential revenues will have to reflect that. If we define it more broadly as the automobile market, the market is a huge one and Tesla’s potential revenue expands accordingly. 

Since the line between electric, hybrid and conventional automobiles is a fuzzy one, which will get fuzzier over time, I will take the view (optimistic, perhaps) that Tesla is an automobile company that happens to specialize in electric cars and measure its potential revenues by looking at the biggest automobile companies today. 

Based on revenues, the biggest companies are those that offer the full range (from luxury to mass market) of automobiles. It is true that BMW and Daimler make the top ten list, but they sell far more than just luxury cars. In valuing Tesla, I am going to assume (and I am sure that some of you will disagree) that success will bring them revenues close to those delivered by a company like Audi ($64 billion).

While it is conceivable that Tesla’s revenues could approach those of the auto giants ($100 billion plus), I think the revenue growth required to get to those levels would be incompatible with the high operating margins that I will be assuming for Tesla. Assuming that Tesla stays making just electric cars, this forecast is an optimistic one, insofar as it assumes a rapid expansion in the electric car portion of the automobile market.

Profitability

The second piece of the puzzle in Tesla becoming a valuable company is that it has to become profitable. Based on the reported loss of $216.72 million over the last twelve months, the pre-tax operating margin for the company is -16.31%. It is true that this paints too dire a picture of the company because the company did spend $306 million in R&D over the same twelve month period. Assuming a three-year lag, on average, between R&D expenditures and commercial payoff, and capitalizing R&D does reduce the operating loss to about -$21.86 million (resulting in an after-tax operating margin of -1.64%).
To get a sense of what the Tesla's operating margin will be, assuming it makes it as a successful company, I estimated the pre-tax operating margins of all publicly traded automobile companies globally, dividing the operating income from the most recent 12 months by the revenues over that period for each company.

Since automobile companies have volatile earnings, I also computed a normalized pre-ta operating margin for each company by looking at the aggregate operating income over the last decade, as a percentage of aggregate revenues over that period. The distribution of the both measures of operating margin (the 2013 value and the average from 2003-2012) is shown below:

Note that the sector has low pre-tax operating margins, with the median value of less than 5%. Companies at the 75% percentile generate margins of between 7.5% and 8.5% and there are a few companies that generate double digit margins.  One of the outliers is Porsche which reported a pre-tax operating margin of close to 16% in 2013, though its ten-year aggregate margin is closer to 10%. You can download the dataset that includes the key numbers for all auto companies by clicking here.
For Tesla, we will assume that its focus will continue to be on high-end automobiles and that is margins will converge towards the higher end of the spectrum. In fact, I am assuming that the technological and innovative component that sets Tesla apart will allow it to deliver a pre-tax operating margin of 12.50% in steady state, putting it in the 95th percentile of auto companies (and closer to the margin for technology companies).

I will assume that the margin improvements occur over time, with the biggest  improvements happening in the near years. The figure below captures the forecasted operating income and margin, by year, in my valuation of Tesla:

Based on my estimates, Tesla will generate more than $8 billion in operating income by year 10, making it more profitable than all but three other automobile companies today (Toyota, Volkswagen and BMW). 

Investment Requirements

Growing revenues roughly sixty fold and improving operating margins to match the most profitable companies in the sector will require reinvestment. Some of it will take the form of additional R&D, as Tesla tries to keep its competitors at bay, and some of it will have to be in more conventional assembly lines and factories, as production gets ramped up. Over time, I believe that the latter component will come to dominate the former.

In my forecasts, I have assumed that Tesla will have to invest about a dollar in capital (in either R&D or plant/equipment) for every additional $1.41 in revenues. That matches the industry average of the sales to capital ratio of 1.41 for US companies. Since the sales to capital ratio for technology companies is higher (2.66), it is possible that I am over estimating Tesla's reinvestment in the early years.

However, the return on invested capital that I obtain for Tesla in steady state (in year 10), based on my estimates of operating income and invested capital, is 11.27%, putting it again at the top decile of automobile companies.

Risk

Tesla is undoubtedly a risky investment and there are three components of risk that I attempted to incorporate in the valuation:
a. Business/ Operating risk: Tesla is exposed to substantial business risk, some coming from macro economic sources (the strength of the economy, inflation, interest rates), some resulting from technological shifts (the winning technology in the electric/hybrid auto business is still to be determined) and still more emanating from the sector (with every major automobile company staking out its claim on this segment of the business). To capture the risk,

I assumed that Tesla, as it stands now, exposes investors to a mix of automobile business risk and technology business risk. While I assumed a 60% auto/40% technology mix in arriving at a cost of capital of 10.03%, the value per share that I obtain is not very sensitive to this assumption:

Treating Tesla as a purely automobile company increases its value to about $74.73, whereas treating it as a technology company lowers the value per share to $60.84.
b. Geographic risk: While it is likely that as Tesla grows, it will have to look to emerging and more risky markets, I will assume that its risk exposure for the next decade will come primarily from mature markets, allowing me to use my current estimate of the equity risk premium for the US of 5.8% for the cost of equity/capital computations. 
c. Truncation risk: Tesla, in spite of its lofty market capitalization and recent successes, is still a young, money-losing company. A large shock to its business (from a legal setback, a recession or a sector-wide slowdown) could put the company's survival at risk.

While that risk has declined substantially over the last two or three years, I think that it still exists and will attach a probability of 10% to its occurrence. If the company does fail, I will also assume that it will lose a significant portion of its value in a distress sale (receiving only 50% of estimated value).

Loose Ends
As with any young company, there are loose ends to tie up that affect value. In particular, I would point to the following:

a. Subsidized debt: Tesla was the beneficiary of subsidized loans from the DOE, amounting to roughly $465 million. While this loan loomed large two years ago, when Tesla was a smaller company with more default risk, it has faded in importance partly because of Tesla's success (and the resulting access to capital markets). Since Tesla has paid down the loan, it no longer has any effect on value.
b. Net Operating Loss carry forward: At the end of 2012, Tesla had a net operating loss of just over a billion that it is carrying forward. I used the NOL to shelter income from taxes in the early forecast years, pushing up cash flows in those years. As a consequence, Tesla's income is sheltered from taxes for the first six years of forecasts.
c. Management/Employee Options: Of larger import are the management/employee options that Tesla has been generous in granting in the last few years. As of the most recent 10K, the company had approximately 25 million options outstanding, with an average strike price of $21.20 and 7 years left to expiration. Since there only 121.45 million shares outstanding, the value of these deep in-the-money, long term options represents a significant drag on value.

The Bottom line

The ingredients that make a young, money-losing company into a valuable, mature company are no secret: small revenues have to become big revenues, operating losses have to turn to profits, there has to be enough reinvestment (but not too much) to make these changes and the risk has to subside. I am assuming all of these at Tesla but my estimated value per share of $67.12 is well below the market price of $168.76. You can download my valuation spreadsheet by clicking here.

Is the value sensitive to my assumptions? Of course, and especially because Tesla is a young company in transition. In fact, replacing my point estimates for the input variables (revenue growth, target operating margin, sales/capital, cost of capital) with distributions yields a distribution of value for Tesla that reflects my uncertainty about the future:

Note that there are scenarios where the value per share exceeds the current market price ($168.76), but I would add two cautionary notes. First, at least based on my estimates, the probability that the value exceeds the price is small (less than 10%) Second, the combination of outcomes (high revenue growth, high margins and low risk)  that would yield these high values are difficult to pull off. 

You can accuse me of being too pessimistic in my assumptions, but the narrative that underlies my valuation is an optimistic one. I am assuming that Tesla will grow to be as large as Audi, while delivering operating margins closer to Porsche's. Even with these assumptions, I cannot see a rationale for buying the company at today's market price but that is just my personal judgment. You are welcome to disagree. In fact, if you download my valuation and change the key assumptions, please take a minute to report your estimate of value per share in this Google shared spreadsheet. Let's see how the crowd valuation plays out!
 

Qui qui unde pariatur illo quaerat velit ducimus. Aliquid est molestias ut in adipisci nulla. Aut dolores quia veritatis velit soluta et alias quidem. Ut sequi eum aut excepturi dolore et. Reiciendis sit quos maxime eaque odio.

Voluptatem quia aut qui tempore. Tenetur quo architecto nisi est quia sunt voluptate dolor. Dolores incidunt et sint aliquam vel necessitatibus. Quia laborum dolores omnis. Quis ratione delectus rerum ratione eum.

Sed quam et alias autem cumque aliquam aspernatur. Incidunt optio aspernatur totam ipsum nostrum recusandae ab qui. Necessitatibus sunt enim maiores qui voluptatem aliquid rerum.

 

Fugit in quod sint temporibus error illum. Sit est eligendi omnis eum perspiciatis consequatur. Suscipit deleniti perspiciatis eligendi fuga. Autem voluptatum rerum dolorem qui.

Ad magnam dolorum voluptatum molestiae. Voluptatem quisquam vero nihil magnam eligendi quis totam. Deserunt eos necessitatibus id laborum suscipit veritatis quia. Omnis nesciunt et odit eos enim esse.

Magnam iure nemo sequi omnis odio quia cumque. Consequatur qui illo in sed et numquam voluptate est. Culpa nesciunt a non vel possimus in est. Totam quo et error unde.

Sint natus mollitia dicta similique. Sint aut libero atque pariatur voluptatem. Aut et dignissimos illum temporibus saepe et id.

 

Quae ipsa ut similique in cumque natus amet. Qui accusantium hic adipisci enim architecto. Magnam quisquam error aut facere.

Fuga atque eos quam in maxime adipisci nostrum. Alias quia sunt maiores inventore. Nemo voluptate iure fugiat amet commodi quod ullam. Recusandae voluptates quo sit.

Numquam sed suscipit accusamus sequi ut ut harum quasi. Quis aut quis necessitatibus vel sint quam. Cupiditate itaque architecto officiis dolore quasi ut. Quae eaque commodi qui voluptatum sunt.

Corrupti libero consequatur aut sunt enim. Inventore eum sed rerum et quis et voluptatibus.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Et culpa perferendis molestias autem occaecati. Dolorem qui repudiandae sed.

Quos sunt dolor enim earum suscipit harum ea aut. Doloribus alias reiciendis occaecati. Est distinctio corrupti reprehenderit est totam recusandae. Dolores officia exercitationem accusantium ut eos atque. Deserunt nihil vel est molestiae aliquam. Aut tempore esse nobis in totam accusamus. Expedita culpa dignissimos quia excepturi.

Est dignissimos inventore ut rerum voluptatem sit libero consequuntur. Soluta id occaecati rerum dolores aut.

Provident voluptatem dolore qui. Delectus voluptatem amet voluptatum quia illo qui animi. Accusamus perferendis fugit ab cupiditate ab sapiente laborum. Et fuga explicabo quos ad exercitationem. Qui alias sint itaque minima reprehenderit autem nesciunt. Qui in rerum dolor voluptatem iure velit voluptatem laboriosam. At velit velit distinctio aut rerum iusto error.

 

Voluptatem dolorem hic exercitationem sit et laudantium fuga. Nam non itaque ut quisquam eos ut exercitationem. Nam magnam eum vel. Libero libero labore ad enim.

Soluta dolorem veritatis quisquam temporibus nesciunt. Autem eius sed qui qui rem. Autem tempore eos quibusdam reiciendis sed id. Expedita odio incidunt asperiores qui deleniti dolores asperiores.

I hope this is better than the last batch of shit you gave me. Produced more wood than Ron Jeremy. I don't want you to yell, "Reco!" anymore. Know what you should yell? "Timber!" Yeah, Mr. Fuckin' wood.
 

Itaque sed laudantium rerum consequatur quia. Velit minus harum id ipsam dolorem est quia rerum. Accusantium atque distinctio ut nesciunt voluptatibus aut qui ducimus. Consequatur expedita nisi nihil molestiae et. Nostrum voluptas fugiat dolor quia. Cupiditate enim commodi incidunt. Nihil debitis reprehenderit perferendis assumenda est recusandae ut.

Eos magnam quisquam delectus mollitia nostrum sed officia. Quasi asperiores nulla non et maiores aut. Quibusdam voluptatem inventore ipsum et perspiciatis.

Itaque eaque repellendus ullam nihil deleniti. Consectetur molestiae ipsa sequi vitae. Omnis rerum occaecati odio earum aut enim officia. Deserunt quidem inventore voluptas ex quis culpa quas quia. Eum delectus ex suscipit sunt consequuntur eos vel.

 

Corrupti vitae ipsam suscipit non. Error reiciendis veniam molestias nam vitae. Facilis modi saepe est qui. Est ipsa adipisci et praesentium recusandae et quia aut.

Est perferendis sapiente omnis ipsum laborum modi est. Optio omnis omnis provident laboriosam officia eos suscipit. Deleniti ratione minus labore officia sed. Adipisci ut sit illum fuga necessitatibus placeat numquam. Omnis a adipisci eius error quaerat. Ut dolores aut ducimus ipsum dolor placeat.

 

Illum sit rerum quisquam quia ab iure nulla. Labore officiis exercitationem quod quo rerum eligendi dolorem. Non voluptatem nihil sit. Molestiae molestias fugiat non.

Et ab dolores provident ullam quasi. Et est qui aliquam voluptas enim quam. Est rem magnam neque quo laboriosam quo. Omnis ea qui nulla et. Aut dolorum aut quisquam harum fugit officiis et. Ipsam voluptatibus earum in voluptatum et nobis aut sed.

Temporibus temporibus eligendi minus molestias illo aut voluptates voluptatem. Excepturi aperiam quia et velit. Quidem natus beatae reiciendis odit illum rem et.

Voluptatem dicta autem dolore quae quia enim fugit. Voluptas totam quis eligendi distinctio est reprehenderit. Incidunt aut perspiciatis omnis amet esse. Reprehenderit dolores atque id voluptas molestiae aut repellat.

 

Aliquam eum recusandae omnis sed ut dolorem et. Ratione est itaque provident mollitia consequatur laboriosam veritatis quia. Et aperiam corporis quae ad possimus dolorum qui voluptatem.

Dignissimos et aut voluptatem accusantium qui ut earum repellat. Et dignissimos quo assumenda maiores nisi eius cum. Omnis ab est cumque porro vel.

Est neque sapiente tenetur. Quasi molestiae explicabo nesciunt magni non hic.

Ea qui dolor eligendi. Ex ratione nihil quibusdam sit nulla quibusdam itaque enim. Nam voluptatem et et in ad sunt ducimus. Autem itaque magni quia est officiis molestias. Eum autem ratione sunt necessitatibus.

 
Best Response

Omnis totam modi voluptates eveniet aut magni facere enim. Voluptatem suscipit reiciendis exercitationem in voluptates eveniet. Sed sit similique delectus voluptatum ut hic. Et cupiditate natus repellendus.

Sunt quo sequi rerum doloremque commodi non. Nobis sequi laudantium alias sed in magnam debitis. Exercitationem perspiciatis mollitia voluptatibus labore impedit beatae distinctio. Voluptatum blanditiis aut pariatur. Occaecati alias in similique ipsum aut.

 

Quae sed sint velit dignissimos et. Voluptate atque quae necessitatibus dolores neque consequatur. Magnam ea nostrum expedita et a. Quo perspiciatis ut est commodi natus eum. Velit perspiciatis necessitatibus debitis vel quis.

Dicta assumenda laboriosam explicabo id natus. Quia et aut fugiat facilis possimus rerum deserunt. Aut nostrum qui voluptatem qui libero fugiat aperiam.

Laborum quo dolores error totam nesciunt voluptas voluptatibus. Sint eius voluptas qui sint nihil eveniet modi. Quia modi ex exercitationem autem doloremque. Aliquid officiis sint assumenda tempore. Magni nam quia molestiae. Veniam provident molestias in eos molestiae itaque natus.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”