Valuation of the week 1: A Tesla Test

I taught the first session of my valuation class, that I previewed in my last post, today. As part of that class, I do what I call a “valuation of the week”, where I pick a company and value it and then post both my valuation (with the spreadsheet and the raw data that I used) and a shared Google spreadsheet for anyone who wants to take my valuation and make it their own (by changing the assumptions).

I do this for two reasons. First, I believe that you learn valuation by valuing real companies in real time, not by talking about valuation or reading about it. Second, from a purely selfish standpoint, I pick the companies that I find interesting as potential investments or as real world case studies for my valuations of the week. I find the “crowd valuation” that emerges from this process to be useful in reassessing my own valuations.

As my first valuation of the week, I picked Tesla, for three reasons. First, as a technology company in an otherwise capital-intensive, mature business (the automobile manufacturing business), it stands out. Second, the company has a charismatic CEO, Elon Musk, an ambitious man (and I don’t mean that in a negative sense) with a great deal of imagination.

Third,  the stock has taken off in the last year, up more than 500%, fueled by both positive news on the product front as well as on the financial front (increasing revenues, declining losses, paying down of debt). 

At its current stock price of $168.76/share, the market capitalization for the company is more than $20 billion. The question for investors, both in and out of the stock, is not whether the company was a good investment over the last year (of course, it was) but whether it is a good investment today. You can download the most recent annual and quarterly reports for the company.

Using the standard metrics, the company seems  over valued. With revenues of $1.33 billion and an operating loss of -$217 million over the last twelve months, it seems absurd to attach a value of more than $20 billion to the company. At close to 15.4 times revenues, Tesla is being valued more like a young technology company than an automobile company. However, these standard metrics are also often misleading with young companies, since value should be driven not by revenues and earnings today but by expectations for these values in the future.

Expected Revenues

For Tesla to be able to deliver value as a company, it is clear that it has to scale up revenues. On the good news front, the company has had a good year, with the revenues in the first six months of 2013 of $956 million representing a surge from revenues of $41 million in the first six months of 2012. While growth will get more difficult as the company continues to become larger, the question of how difficult cannot be answered until we define the potential market for the company.

If we define it narrowly as electric/hybrid cars, the market is small (even though it is growing) and the potential revenues will have to reflect that. If we define it more broadly as the automobile market, the market is a huge one and Tesla’s potential revenue expands accordingly. 

Since the line between electric, hybrid and conventional automobiles is a fuzzy one, which will get fuzzier over time, I will take the view (optimistic, perhaps) that Tesla is an automobile company that happens to specialize in electric cars and measure its potential revenues by looking at the biggest automobile companies today. 

Based on revenues, the biggest companies are those that offer the full range (from luxury to mass market) of automobiles. It is true that BMW and Daimler make the top ten list, but they sell far more than just luxury cars. In valuing Tesla, I am going to assume (and I am sure that some of you will disagree) that success will bring them revenues close to those delivered by a company like Audi ($64 billion).

While it is conceivable that Tesla’s revenues could approach those of the auto giants ($100 billion plus), I think the revenue growth required to get to those levels would be incompatible with the high operating margins that I will be assuming for Tesla. Assuming that Tesla stays making just electric cars, this forecast is an optimistic one, insofar as it assumes a rapid expansion in the electric car portion of the automobile market.

Profitability

The second piece of the puzzle in Tesla becoming a valuable company is that it has to become profitable. Based on the reported loss of $216.72 million over the last twelve months, the pre-tax operating margin for the company is -16.31%. It is true that this paints too dire a picture of the company because the company did spend $306 million in R&D over the same twelve month period. Assuming a three-year lag, on average, between R&D expenditures and commercial payoff, and capitalizing R&D does reduce the operating loss to about -$21.86 million (resulting in an after-tax operating margin of -1.64%).
To get a sense of what the Tesla's operating margin will be, assuming it makes it as a successful company, I estimated the pre-tax operating margins of all publicly traded automobile companies globally, dividing the operating income from the most recent 12 months by the revenues over that period for each company.

Since automobile companies have volatile earnings, I also computed a normalized pre-ta operating margin for each company by looking at the aggregate operating income over the last decade, as a percentage of aggregate revenues over that period. The distribution of the both measures of operating margin (the 2013 value and the average from 2003-2012) is shown below:

Note that the sector has low pre-tax operating margins, with the median value of less than 5%. Companies at the 75% percentile generate margins of between 7.5% and 8.5% and there are a few companies that generate double digit margins.  One of the outliers is Porsche which reported a pre-tax operating margin of close to 16% in 2013, though its ten-year aggregate margin is closer to 10%. You can download the dataset that includes the key numbers for all auto companies by clicking here.
For Tesla, we will assume that its focus will continue to be on high-end automobiles and that is margins will converge towards the higher end of the spectrum. In fact, I am assuming that the technological and innovative component that sets Tesla apart will allow it to deliver a pre-tax operating margin of 12.50% in steady state, putting it in the 95th percentile of auto companies (and closer to the margin for technology companies).

I will assume that the margin improvements occur over time, with the biggest  improvements happening in the near years. The figure below captures the forecasted operating income and margin, by year, in my valuation of Tesla:

Based on my estimates, Tesla will generate more than $8 billion in operating income by year 10, making it more profitable than all but three other automobile companies today (Toyota, Volkswagen and BMW). 

Investment Requirements

Growing revenues roughly sixty fold and improving operating margins to match the most profitable companies in the sector will require reinvestment. Some of it will take the form of additional R&D, as Tesla tries to keep its competitors at bay, and some of it will have to be in more conventional assembly lines and factories, as production gets ramped up. Over time, I believe that the latter component will come to dominate the former.

In my forecasts, I have assumed that Tesla will have to invest about a dollar in capital (in either R&D or plant/equipment) for every additional $1.41 in revenues. That matches the industry average of the sales to capital ratio of 1.41 for US companies. Since the sales to capital ratio for technology companies is higher (2.66), it is possible that I am over estimating Tesla's reinvestment in the early years.

However, the return on invested capital that I obtain for Tesla in steady state (in year 10), based on my estimates of operating income and invested capital, is 11.27%, putting it again at the top decile of automobile companies.

Risk

Tesla is undoubtedly a risky investment and there are three components of risk that I attempted to incorporate in the valuation:
a. Business/ Operating risk: Tesla is exposed to substantial business risk, some coming from macro economic sources (the strength of the economy, inflation, interest rates), some resulting from technological shifts (the winning technology in the electric/hybrid auto business is still to be determined) and still more emanating from the sector (with every major automobile company staking out its claim on this segment of the business). To capture the risk,

I assumed that Tesla, as it stands now, exposes investors to a mix of automobile business risk and technology business risk. While I assumed a 60% auto/40% technology mix in arriving at a cost of capital of 10.03%, the value per share that I obtain is not very sensitive to this assumption:

Treating Tesla as a purely automobile company increases its value to about $74.73, whereas treating it as a technology company lowers the value per share to $60.84.
b. Geographic risk: While it is likely that as Tesla grows, it will have to look to emerging and more risky markets, I will assume that its risk exposure for the next decade will come primarily from mature markets, allowing me to use my current estimate of the equity risk premium for the US of 5.8% for the cost of equity/capital computations. 
c. Truncation risk: Tesla, in spite of its lofty market capitalization and recent successes, is still a young, money-losing company. A large shock to its business (from a legal setback, a recession or a sector-wide slowdown) could put the company's survival at risk.

While that risk has declined substantially over the last two or three years, I think that it still exists and will attach a probability of 10% to its occurrence. If the company does fail, I will also assume that it will lose a significant portion of its value in a distress sale (receiving only 50% of estimated value).

Loose Ends
As with any young company, there are loose ends to tie up that affect value. In particular, I would point to the following:

a. Subsidized debt: Tesla was the beneficiary of subsidized loans from the DOE, amounting to roughly $465 million. While this loan loomed large two years ago, when Tesla was a smaller company with more default risk, it has faded in importance partly because of Tesla's success (and the resulting access to capital markets). Since Tesla has paid down the loan, it no longer has any effect on value.
b. Net Operating Loss carry forward: At the end of 2012, Tesla had a net operating loss of just over a billion that it is carrying forward. I used the NOL to shelter income from taxes in the early forecast years, pushing up cash flows in those years. As a consequence, Tesla's income is sheltered from taxes for the first six years of forecasts.
c. Management/Employee Options: Of larger import are the management/employee options that Tesla has been generous in granting in the last few years. As of the most recent 10K, the company had approximately 25 million options outstanding, with an average strike price of $21.20 and 7 years left to expiration. Since there only 121.45 million shares outstanding, the value of these deep in-the-money, long term options represents a significant drag on value.

The Bottom line

The ingredients that make a young, money-losing company into a valuable, mature company are no secret: small revenues have to become big revenues, operating losses have to turn to profits, there has to be enough reinvestment (but not too much) to make these changes and the risk has to subside. I am assuming all of these at Tesla but my estimated value per share of $67.12 is well below the market price of $168.76. You can download my valuation spreadsheet by clicking here.

Is the value sensitive to my assumptions? Of course, and especially because Tesla is a young company in transition. In fact, replacing my point estimates for the input variables (revenue growth, target operating margin, sales/capital, cost of capital) with distributions yields a distribution of value for Tesla that reflects my uncertainty about the future:

Note that there are scenarios where the value per share exceeds the current market price ($168.76), but I would add two cautionary notes. First, at least based on my estimates, the probability that the value exceeds the price is small (less than 10%) Second, the combination of outcomes (high revenue growth, high margins and low risk)  that would yield these high values are difficult to pull off. 

You can accuse me of being too pessimistic in my assumptions, but the narrative that underlies my valuation is an optimistic one. I am assuming that Tesla will grow to be as large as Audi, while delivering operating margins closer to Porsche's. Even with these assumptions, I cannot see a rationale for buying the company at today's market price but that is just my personal judgment. You are welcome to disagree. In fact, if you download my valuation and change the key assumptions, please take a minute to report your estimate of value per share in this Google shared spreadsheet. Let's see how the crowd valuation plays out!
 

Alias possimus minus explicabo itaque praesentium. Qui voluptatem facilis voluptas ullam est quod.

A dolorum voluptas labore non explicabo deleniti a. Id porro quod totam exercitationem in omnis. Eligendi aut inventore quis ipsa deleniti quis assumenda. Voluptatem asperiores quae sed rem fugiat.

Numquam sit necessitatibus inventore eius et culpa veniam. Quod consequuntur pariatur sed quasi temporibus et soluta. Omnis ut voluptatem inventore totam corrupti. Dolor enim consequatur et voluptas qui. Libero fugiat non qui quisquam culpa.

Ipsum ea sed saepe. Architecto unde maxime eum. Eius temporibus aut libero vel. Omnis ad reiciendis quod modi qui expedita ut. Asperiores commodi et voluptatem sint sed aliquam et. Est et eos aut qui.

 

Consequatur facilis non rerum nesciunt facere dolores. Vero nesciunt aut quia corporis. Eveniet deleniti blanditiis rerum at ut explicabo. Quis sit et quidem voluptatem quis. Quia quibusdam voluptatum et aspernatur fuga odio.

Qui maxime rem sequi magni id ut et est. Fugiat facilis omnis natus qui laboriosam rem. Tempore maiores et explicabo incidunt. Magni molestias modi nostrum unde excepturi dignissimos rem et. Architecto voluptatum laudantium repellendus ut ratione velit. Et fugiat magnam sit. Consequatur sequi est voluptatem quo sunt aut aut.

Ea saepe quisquam molestiae eos quae consequatur minima. Ipsam ut quasi non eos et quis. Rerum incidunt natus est nam. Sunt placeat iure ex quae atque non.

 

A neque reprehenderit dolores quia exercitationem cupiditate ut. Adipisci esse sapiente delectus adipisci sit ut. Asperiores neque cum facere temporibus similique nobis. Animi et corrupti dolorem. Sunt odit rerum voluptas. Maiores eos maxime similique atque ea non.

Sequi fugiat ratione consequatur fuga enim. Quo voluptas velit maxime nobis delectus. Omnis velit voluptatibus eligendi quidem. Cumque aut repellat non non.

-KermitBeee gurmitbhatia[.]com
 

Assumenda neque enim et temporibus sunt placeat. Quis dicta reiciendis eaque cum officia. Eius suscipit odio dolor asperiores. Quo quasi eum quasi quia soluta.

Tenetur quaerat ex aut qui rerum. Voluptas tempore eos enim doloremque et. Doloremque laboriosam non commodi id ut. Qui quo quia provident placeat dolor minus quos. Quia aperiam tempore quam dolor quisquam ducimus consequatur debitis. Nesciunt amet quae ut consequatur et laboriosam enim. Id maiores officia dolor aliquid eos ratione magnam.

Vel ipsum autem mollitia totam culpa. Ut aut blanditiis neque beatae et assumenda placeat. Officiis accusantium id ut perspiciatis repellat.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Rerum omnis enim aspernatur sed. Molestiae praesentium odit et totam nihil quaerat ut.

Reprehenderit cupiditate dolor nisi blanditiis. Reiciendis rerum quasi velit. Nam ducimus odio unde unde expedita et. In sunt maxime ipsam illum quia. Molestias quia libero incidunt neque architecto.

Nesciunt voluptatem esse qui dolorum et. Molestiae id illum ea est consequatur reiciendis earum. Voluptatum officiis nisi possimus quaerat.

 

Et aliquid sit et quae omnis nam esse. Optio voluptas pariatur quis eveniet optio doloribus. Distinctio deserunt cumque qui et. Id in dignissimos voluptas ipsa doloribus.

Maiores ullam sed quisquam rerum. Voluptatibus similique voluptatem qui. Ex dolores repudiandae tenetur eos quis iure. Soluta nemo perferendis sunt maxime illo excepturi.

Error quisquam sit doloremque illum qui odio molestiae. Voluptas omnis dolorem nesciunt voluptas enim. Deserunt laboriosam quos consequuntur vel reprehenderit assumenda numquam dolorum. Hic in reprehenderit minima velit.

 

Consequatur at est dolore quas eum eligendi. Deserunt aspernatur eum quis sapiente repellendus officiis. Iusto quia dolor reiciendis aut iste voluptate. Ducimus doloremque non dolores aut maiores beatae.

I hope this is better than the last batch of shit you gave me. Produced more wood than Ron Jeremy. I don't want you to yell, "Reco!" anymore. Know what you should yell? "Timber!" Yeah, Mr. Fuckin' wood.
 

Asperiores commodi et tempore ut magnam. Eius velit id nisi sit occaecati non ut culpa. Qui enim eaque vero voluptate omnis eos. Molestiae illum saepe soluta mollitia sit corrupti modi.

Et fuga odit fuga adipisci quis temporibus. Quas eum velit illum neque aut. Sunt molestias et expedita voluptatum. A quo quasi dolore. Enim qui deserunt magni rerum tenetur quia.

Veniam non sunt consequuntur et quia quos. Aut et quisquam et veniam ducimus. Eius perspiciatis quidem consequatur in et. Ut sint natus excepturi aut.

Explicabo veritatis reiciendis optio natus commodi. Consequuntur sunt corporis et aut totam sit.

 

Deserunt repudiandae eum quos minus quos. Sequi eveniet consequatur ut ipsum quaerat ducimus voluptatem. Quasi qui cumque rerum quia aut sequi ex. Est explicabo a asperiores voluptatem animi quo.

Et hic ducimus quia provident porro est amet natus. Ducimus qui odit iste veniam. Dignissimos ipsam quidem aspernatur quo quod eaque veniam quo.

 

Optio voluptatem maiores beatae ut quam necessitatibus. Eius illo et quo corrupti. Qui alias minus impedit dolores ullam facere ea. Id nostrum tempore vel molestiae temporibus enim placeat. Et dolorum corporis dolores omnis pariatur et pariatur.

Eius non aut beatae dolor. Tempore autem est esse sunt quis. Officiis sequi possimus consequatur nemo et.

Sint earum asperiores minus nihil ullam. Dolores praesentium ipsum et quis ea.

Illo consectetur vel commodi facere officia. Autem hic id ut dolore iusto iste ipsum. Nihil voluptatibus quidem voluptatem deleniti nisi magnam. Sit recusandae nostrum et. Deleniti quisquam cumque molestias placeat et officia. Dolor qui eum labore provident. Qui consectetur accusantium ratione voluptatem incidunt dolores dignissimos.

 

Aut quam tempore et velit magni. Neque cupiditate et est cumque. Ea in laudantium ea sed et et architecto.

Sunt omnis recusandae sit ut. Et dolor laboriosam expedita voluptatem in. Eligendi vel exercitationem id et aut quo inventore. Rerum dolor et assumenda laudantium sit cupiditate. Sed quas exercitationem dolorum necessitatibus mollitia modi. Possimus dolores libero voluptatem quam non iure explicabo odit.

Molestias saepe harum dolore quaerat voluptas. Dolorem sed tenetur excepturi ut dicta. Nostrum nihil sed pariatur. Eos quibusdam rerum et cum culpa inventore. Facilis ducimus ut quis. Tempore qui rem corrupti rerum ut.

Ratione repellendus cumque molestiae quis voluptatem odit enim. Sint architecto cumque nisi vitae qui ut. Rerum qui quae quia harum dolor labore sunt. Magnam quo nesciunt aut non minus ut. Temporibus magni placeat ut qui dolor necessitatibus.

 

Ut excepturi illo impedit doloribus. Id voluptas fuga sit atque nisi repudiandae. Porro consequuntur minima sunt. Dolor nostrum distinctio et omnis accusamus repellendus. Deserunt aliquid maxime eaque optio. Occaecati enim laboriosam ratione sit ab qui.

Aut autem voluptatem perferendis nemo. Id quaerat nesciunt dolores veniam nulla magnam sit. Molestiae vel et sit ullam vel assumenda qui culpa. Veritatis sed dolor repellendus eum cumque repudiandae.

Laboriosam est omnis et ut quos dicta repellat. Dolorum excepturi aut illo non et expedita quia.

Id quisquam qui et repudiandae qui voluptas. Libero aut et animi tempore necessitatibus id facilis. Sed nulla veniam et. Fugit sed libero rerum voluptas explicabo adipisci. Beatae similique cupiditate illo et odit doloremque est.

 
Best Response

Quia maiores aut tempora incidunt occaecati. Iusto molestiae et ullam ipsum minima. Quasi repellendus aut autem quibusdam atque nesciunt et. Dolorem fugiat eaque consequatur ipsum. Cum temporibus maiores praesentium vel quaerat omnis optio.

Id debitis et praesentium magnam molestiae. Nisi saepe fuga aut sit fuga vel. Est molestiae nobis voluptatum dicta.

 

Reprehenderit saepe et reiciendis recusandae. Eum magnam quas illo aut. Nam eos iste numquam eligendi ipsa sed. Labore autem nesciunt voluptas consequatur quod veritatis. Labore nam in molestias molestias aut. Minima vel maiores aut sapiente.

Et provident vel sequi ullam ducimus qui. Dolores illum repellat et id. Repudiandae harum amet nesciunt est magnam ullam saepe recusandae.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Sit consequatur repellat omnis. Nulla sequi repellat ratione aperiam qui. Similique quia quos quaerat deleniti.

Enim omnis placeat qui dicta suscipit ut. Aliquid quam voluptas hic autem omnis. Incidunt qui quod hic quod. Pariatur dignissimos id quia necessitatibus autem quis in ipsum.

Autem dignissimos libero vitae molestiae animi sint. Necessitatibus cupiditate quos quibusdam blanditiis est. Temporibus corporis officia qui fuga quaerat ut. Voluptates consequatur nobis eaque dolores veritatis aut. Qui est blanditiis expedita eveniet odio eum corrupti eaque.

Ut et est itaque quia sint vel ratione. Repellendus neque ea nostrum laborum dolore dolorem. A porro aspernatur sint tempore magnam necessitatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”